Leveraging public health cancer surveillance capacity to develop and support a rural cancer network

被引:1
|
作者
Semprini, Jason [1 ]
Lizarraga, Ingrid M. [2 ]
Seaman, Aaron T. [3 ]
Johnson, Erin C. [4 ]
Wahlen, Madison M. [1 ]
Gorzelitz, Jessica S. [5 ]
Birken, Sarah A. [6 ]
Schroeder, Mary C. [7 ,8 ]
Paulus, Tarah [2 ]
Charlton, Mary E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Iowa City, IA USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Carver Coll Med, Dept Surg, Iowa City, IA USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Carver Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Iowa City, IA USA
[4] Univ Iowa, Tippie Coll Business, Iowa City, IA USA
[5] Univ Iowa, Coll Liberal Arts & Sci, Dept Hlth & Human Physiol, Iowa City, IA USA
[6] Wake Forest Univ, Dept Implementat Sci, Sch Med, Iowa City, IA USA
[7] Univ Iowa, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharm Practice & Sci, Iowa City, IA USA
[8] Univ Iowa, Coll Publ Hlth, Iowa Canc Registry, Iowa City, IA USA
来源
LEARNING HEALTH SYSTEMS | 2024年 / 8卷 / 04期
关键词
cancer; networks; quality; rural; surveillance; LYMPH-NODE BIOPSY; DISPARITIES;
D O I
10.1002/lrh2.10448
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionAs the rural-urban cancer mortality gap widens, centering care around the needs of rural patients presents an opportunity to advance equity. One barrier to delivering patient-centered care at rural hospitals stems from limited analytic capacity to leverage data and monitor patient outcomes. This case study describes the experience of a public health cancer surveillance system aiming to fill this gap within the context of a rural cancer network.MethodsTo support the implementation of a novel network model intervention in Iowa, the Iowa Cancer Registry began generating hospital-specific and catchment area reports. Then, the Iowa Cancer Registry supported adapting the network model to fit the context of Iowa's cancer care delivery system by performing data monitoring and reporting functions. Informed by a gap analysis, the Iowa Cancer Registry then identified which quality accreditation standards could be achieved with public health surveillance data and analytic support.ResultsThe network intervention in Iowa supported 5 rural cancer centers across the state, each concurrently pursuing quality accreditation standards. The Iowa Cancer Registry's hospital and catchment-specific reports illuminated the cancer burden and needs of rural cancer centers within the network. Our team identified 19 (of the 36 total) quality standards that can be supported by public health surveillance functions typically performed by the registry. These standards encompassed data-driven quality improvement, patient monitoring, and reporting guideline-concordant care standards.ConclusionsAs rural hospitals continue to face resource constraints, multisectoral efforts informed by data from centralized public health surveillance systems can promote quality improvement initiatives across rural communities. While our work remains preliminary, we predict that analytic support provided by the Iowa Cancer Registry will enable the rural network hospitals to focus their capacity toward developing the infrastructure necessary to deliver high-quality care and serve the unique needs of rural cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Rural cancer survivors' health information needs post-treatment
    Palmer, Nynikka R.
    Avis, Nancy E.
    Fino, Nora F.
    Tooze, Janet A.
    Weaver, Kathryn E.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2020, 103 (08) : 1606 - 1614
  • [22] Cancer cervix - need for mass surveillance program specially in rural areas
    Kiran, Pandey
    Ajay, Bhagoliwal
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2005, 55 (05) : 436 - 439
  • [23] A Vision for Leveraging the Concept of Digital Twins to Support the Provision of Personalized Cancer Care
    Wickramasinghe, Nilmini
    Jayaraman, Prem Prakash
    Forkan, Abdur Rahim Mohammad
    Ulapane, Nalika
    Kaul, Rohit
    Vaughan, Stephen
    Zelcer, John
    IEEE INTERNET COMPUTING, 2022, 26 (05) : 17 - 24
  • [24] Public health genomics capacity assessment: readiness for large-scale pathogen genomic surveillance in Canada’s public health laboratories
    C. Nadon
    M. Croxen
    N. Knox
    J. Tanner
    A. Zetner
    C. Yoshida
    G. Van Domselaar
    BMC Public Health, 22
  • [25] Public health genomics capacity assessment: readiness for large-scale pathogen genomic surveillance in Canada's public health laboratories
    Nadon, C.
    Croxen, M.
    Knox, N.
    Tanner, J.
    Zetner, A.
    Yoshida, C.
    Van Domselaar, G.
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [26] Evidence-Based Conceptual Collection of Methods for Spatial Epidemiology and Analysis to Enhance Cancer Surveillance and Public Health
    Sifaki-Pistolla, Dimitra
    Chatzea, Vasiliki Eirini
    Frouzi, Elpiniki
    Mechili, Enkeleint A.
    Pistolla, Georgia
    Nikiforidis, George
    Georgoulias, Vassilis
    Lionis, Christos
    Tzanakis, Nikos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (19)
  • [27] Cancer incidence in The Health Improvement Network
    Haynes, Kevin
    Forde, Kimberly A.
    Schinnar, Rita
    Wong, Patricia
    Strom, Brian L.
    Lewis, James D.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2009, 18 (08) : 730 - 736
  • [28] A systematic review and comparative evaluation to develop and validate a comprehensive framework for cancer surveillance systems
    Mohsen Soleimani
    Marjan GhaziSaeedi
    Seyed Mohammad Ayyoubzadeh
    Ahmad Jalilvand
    Archives of Public Health, 83 (1)
  • [29] Support-seeking by cancer caregivers living in rural Australia
    Johnston, Elizabeth A.
    Goodwin, Belinda C.
    Myers, Larry
    March, Sonja
    Aitken, Joanne F.
    Chambers, Suzanne K.
    Dunn, Jeff
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 46 (06) : 850 - 857
  • [30] Differences in the health, mental health and health-promoting behaviours of rural versus urban cancer survivors in Australia
    Gunn, Kate M.
    Berry, Narelle M.
    Meng, Xingqiong
    Wilson, Carlene J.
    Dollman, James
    Woodman, Richard J.
    Clark, Robyn A.
    Koczwara, Bogda
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2020, 28 (02) : 633 - 643