Does artificial intelligence affect the ecological footprint? -Evidence from 30 provinces in China

被引:5
|
作者
Wang, Yong [1 ]
Zhang, Ru [1 ]
Yao, Kainan [1 ]
Ma, Xuejiao [2 ]
机构
[1] Dongbei Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Stat, Dalian 116025, Peoples R China
[2] Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Ecological footprint; Energy efficiency; Single threshold effect; SLACKS-BASED MEASURE; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122458
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Artificial intelligence (AI) technology serves as a powerful tool to optimize energy efficiency and lessen ecological footprints. Using data from 30 provinces in China over the period from 2018 to 2022, this study investigates how regional AI development affects the per capita ecological footprint and explores the underlying mechanisms. The results show that: (1) Regional AI development can significantly decrease the ecological footprint, and this conclusion remains robust after a series of robustness checks. (2) Mediation effect analysis indicates that AI technology mainly decreases the ecological footprint by improving energy utilization efficiency. (3) The panel threshold model results show that AI's influence on the ecological footprint has a single energy efficiency threshold. Only when regional energy efficiency exceeds a certain threshold can AI fully exert its suppressive effect on the ecological footprint. (4) Regional heterogeneity analysis shows that the reduction effect of AI on the ecological footprint is more pronounced in the central and eastern regions of China. This paper helps clarify the specific impact of AI technology development on the ecological footprint and provides scientific evidence for regional technology development, energy efficiency improvement, and ecological environment policy formulation.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Does artificial intelligence affect firms' inner wage gap?
    Yuan, Yiming
    Sun, Yongming
    Chen, Hangyu
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2025, 57 (19) : 2365 - 2371
  • [42] Artificial intelligence and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China
    Chen, Hong
    Zhang, Mengyun
    Zeng, Jun
    Wang, Wenhua
    CHINA JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2024, 17 (03)
  • [43] Artificial Intelligence and Food Processing Firms Productivity: Evidence from China
    Liu, Huanan
    Wang, Yan
    Yan, Zhoufu
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (14)
  • [44] Does ecological footprint matter for the shape of the environmental Kuznets curve? Evidence from European countries
    Saqib, Muhammad
    Benhmad, Francois
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (11) : 13634 - 13648
  • [45] Does Innovation Efficiency Suppress the Ecological Footprint? Empirical Evidence from 280 Chinese Cities
    Ke, Haiqian
    Yang, Wenyi
    Liu, Xiaoyang
    Fan, Fei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (18) : 1 - 23
  • [46] Impact of artificial intelligence on carbon emission efficiency: evidence from China
    Wu, Jie
    Liu, Tao
    Sun, Jiasen
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2024, 31 (01) : 144 - 166
  • [47] Artificial intelligence and outward foreign direct investment: Evidence from China
    Huang, Keqi
    Liu, Qiren
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN ECONOMICS, 2024, 92
  • [48] The role of artificial intelligence in corporate digital strategies: evidence from China
    Yang, Shaohua
    Hussain, Murtaza
    Zahid, R. M. Ammar
    Maqsood, Umer Sahil
    KYBERNETES, 2025, 54 (05) : 3062 - 3082
  • [49] Does pollution haven hypothesis hold in newly industrialized countries? Evidence from ecological footprint
    Mehmet Akif Destek
    Ilyas Okumus
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26 : 23689 - 23695
  • [50] Does ecological footprint matter for the shape of the environmental Kuznets curve? Evidence from European countries
    Muhammad Saqib
    François Benhmad
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 : 13634 - 13648