Experience of Pelvic Examination and Uptake of Gynecological Care Following Domestic or Sexual Violence: a Systematic Review

被引:0
作者
Iraola, Elisabeth [1 ,2 ]
Menard, Jean-Pierre [2 ]
Chariot, Patrick [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Rech Interdisciplinaire Enjeux Sociaux IRIS, Aubervilliers, France
[2] Direct protect maternelle & infantile & promot St, Creteil, France
关键词
domestic violence; sexual assault; child abuse; POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER; INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE; VAGINAL EXAMINATION; LIFETIME DIAGNOSIS; ABUSE; WOMEN; HEALTH; HISTORY; TRAUMA; LUBRICATION;
D O I
10.1177/15248380241270038
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Pelvic examination, a routine practice for gynecological care, can cause anxiety and be considered traumatic. This study aimed to define the association between domestic or sexual violence and the experience of pelvic examination, as well as the uptake of gynecological care following domestic or sexual violence. Pubmed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar were searched, up to April 30, 2023. Cohort, cross-sectional, case-control studies and controlled trials assessing perception of pelvic examination or the use of gynecological care for women with a history of violence were selected and analyzed. Each study underwent a descriptive analysis and was assessed for bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the RoB2 tool. Twenty-three articles met the inclusion criteria. Eleven studies, including 7,329 women, investigated the experience of pelvic examination following lifetime or childhood sexual violence. Most reported an association between violence and adverse experiences of pelvic examination, such as discomfort, anxiety, distress, and pain perceptions. Ten studies, including 9,248 women, investigated the uptake of gynecological care following domestic or sexual violence and reported mixed results, such as a decreased or an increased uptake, particularly for acute symptoms. Two studies, including 1,304 women, examined both outcomes. The present study highlights the association between violence and adverse experiences of pelvic examination, as well as mixed results on the uptake of gynecological care. It argues for the necessity to screen for violence in consultations, particularly when considering a pelvic examination, to guarantee the utility of pelvic examinations, and to consider the traumatic impact of sexual violence in care.
引用
收藏
页码:4030 / 4044
页数:15
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [1] A History of Interpersonal Trauma and the Gynecological Exam
    Ackerson, Kelly
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2012, 22 (05) : 679 - 688
  • [2] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), 2021, UPDATED CERVICAL CAN
  • [3] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), 2021, COMMITTEE OPINION NO
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2018, Committee opinion No. 649: Racial and ethnic disparities in obstetrics and gynecology
  • [5] Well-Woman Visit
    Witkop, Catherine
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 132 (04) : E181 - E186
  • [6] Cervical Cancer Screening and Prevention among Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence
    Bagwell-Gray, Meredith E.
    Ramaswamy, Megha
    [J]. HEALTH & SOCIAL WORK, 2022, 47 (02) : 102 - 112
  • [7] Speculum Lubrication and Patient Comfort: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Bakker, Ronan
    Peng, Katherine
    Chelmow, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE, 2017, 21 (01) : 67 - 72
  • [8] Forensic Medical Examination After Sexual Violence: Implications Based on Victims' Perceptions
    Berger, Laura
    Tuschy, Benjamin
    Stefanovic, Stefan
    Yen, Kathrin
    Weiss, Christel
    Suetterlin, Marc
    Spaich, Saskia
    Berlit, Sebastian
    [J]. IN VIVO, 2023, 37 (02): : 848 - 857
  • [9] Barriers to cervical screening in women who have experienced sexual abuse: an exploratory study
    Cadman, Louise
    Waller, Jo
    Ashdown-Barr, Lesley
    Szarewski, Anne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAMILY PLANNING AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2012, 38 (04) : 214 - 220
  • [10] Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline
    Campbell, Mhairi
    McKenzie, Joanne E.
    Sowden, Amanda
    Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
    Brennan, Sue E.
    Ellis, Simon
    Hartmann-Boyce, Jamie
    Ryan, Rebecca
    Shepperd, Sasha
    Thomas, James
    Welch, Vivian
    Thomson, Hilary
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 368