Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Hope in Medicine Scale

被引:0
作者
Balthasar, Lea [1 ]
Braescher, Anne-Kathrin [2 ]
Kaptchuk, Ted J. [3 ]
Ballou, Sarah K. [3 ,4 ]
Kube, Tobias [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] RPTU Kaiserslautern Landau, Pain & Psychotherapy Res Lab, Ostbahnstr 10, D-76829 Landau, Germany
[2] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Dept Clin Psychol Psychotherapy & Expt Psychopatho, Mainz, Germany
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Program Placebo Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Div Gastroenterol, Boston, MA USA
关键词
hope; placebo; questionnaire; self-report; allergic rhinitis; PLACEBOS; RHINOCONJUNCTIVITIS; OPTIMISM; HEALTH; MODES;
D O I
10.32872/cpe.12001
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Background: Hope is an integral, multi-dimensional part of seeking medical treatment. The aim of this study was to develop a self-report scale, the Hope in Medicine (HIM) scale, to measure different modes of hoping in relation to the course of symptoms, the effects of treatment, and supporting medical research. Method: We examined the psychometric properties of the scale in a sample of 74 allergic rhinitis patients participating in a 2-week randomized-controlled trial comparing open-label placebos (OLP) with treatment as usual (TAU). Results: The HIM scale had a Cronbach's alpha of .78. An exploratory factor analysis revealed four factors: realistic hope (i.e., hoping for specific positive outcomes such as improvement in symptoms), transcendent hope (i.e., non-directed hoping that things will turn out positively), utopian hope (i.e., hoping to contribute to greater knowledge), and technoscience hope (i.e., hoping for scientific breakthroughs). Speaking to the convergent validity of the scale, realistic hope was moderately related to treatment expectancies (r = .54); transcendent hope was related to optimism (r = .50), treatment expectancies (r = .37), self-efficacy (r = .36), and inversely correlated with pessimism (r =-.43). Hope subscales predicted neither course of symptoms nor impairment. Conclusion: The HIM scale is a questionnaire with adequate internal consistency allowing to assess four modes of hoping. Preliminary results for its convergent validity are promising. Yet, further validation is needed.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MERRIAM WEBSTERCOM D
[2]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[3]   Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health,Social, and Behavioral Research:A Primer [J].
Boateng, Godfred O. ;
Neilands, Torsten B. ;
Frongillo, Edward A. ;
Melgar-Quinonez, Hugo R. ;
Young, Sera L. .
FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 6
[4]   Distinguishing hope from optimism and related affective states [J].
Bruininks, Patricia ;
Malle, Bertram F. .
MOTIVATION AND EMOTION, 2005, 29 (04) :327-355
[5]  
Dahl G., 1971, Diagnostica, V17, P139
[6]   Reactions to treatment debriefing among the participants of a placebo controlled trial [J].
Di Blasi, Z ;
Crawford, F ;
Bradley, C ;
Kleijnen, J .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2005, 5 (1)
[7]   Ways of Hoping: Navigating the Paradox of Hope and Despair in Chronic Pain [J].
Eaves, Emery R. ;
Nichter, Mark ;
Ritenbaugh, Cheryl .
CULTURE MEDICINE AND PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 40 (01) :35-58
[8]   A qualitative study of changes in expectations over time among patients with chronic low back pain seeking four CAM therapies [J].
Eaves, Emery R. ;
Sherman, Karen J. ;
Ritenbaugh, Cheryl ;
Hsu, Clarissa ;
Nichter, Mark ;
Turner, Judith A. ;
Cherkin, Daniel C. .
BMC COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2015, 15
[9]   MODES OF HOPING: UNDERSTANDING HOPE AND EXPECTATION IN THE CONTEXT OF A CLINICAL TRIAL OF COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE FOR CHRONIC PAIN [J].
Eaves, Emery R. ;
Ritenbaugh, Cheryl ;
Nichter, Mark ;
Hopkins, Allison L. ;
Sherman, Karen J. .
EXPLORE-THE JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND HEALING, 2014, 10 (04) :225-232
[10]   OPINION The placebo response in medicine: minimize, maximize or personalize? [J].
Enck, Paul ;
Bingel, Ulrike ;
Schedlowski, Manfred ;
Rief, Winfried .
NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2013, 12 (03) :191-204