Get organized? Creating an organizational context for civil society activities in urban sustainability transitions

被引:1
作者
Pflitsch, Gesa [1 ,2 ]
Hendriks, Nadja [3 ]
Coenen, Lars [1 ,4 ]
Radinger-Peer, Verena [2 ]
机构
[1] Western Norway Univ Appl Sci, Mohn Ctr Innovat & Reg Dev, Bergen, Norway
[2] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci Vienna, Dept Landscape Spatial & Infrastruct Sci, A-1190 Vienna, Austria
[3] Univ Augsburg, Applicat Ctr Mat & Environm Res, Univ Str 1a, D-86159 Augsburg, Germany
[4] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Ctr Cities, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Urban governance; Sustainability transitions; Civil society actors; Local agenda 21; Institutional work; Organizational context; GRASS-ROOTS INNOVATIONS; SOCIOTECHNICAL TRANSITIONS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; KNOWLEDGE; POLICY; INSTITUTIONS; SUCCESS; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.eist.2024.100889
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The paper addresses tensions in organizing civil society activities in urban sustainability transitions. It argues that these activities need focus to be impactful while also demanding flexibility to remain adaptive. The latter can hardly be achieved by individual organizations alone but requires closer examination of the ecology of organizations in which civil society actors operate. This paper contributes to the literature on the governance of urban sustainability by systematically analyzing this organizational context and its long-term dynamics. Adopting a neo-institutional lens, the paper scrutinizes civil society activities with the 'institutional work' approach and sheds light on how the organizational context enables changes therein. The longitudinal case study of the Local Agenda 21 in Augsburg reveals, via a mixed-method approach, how civil society actors navigate tensions by altering their organizational context. Increasing its diversity and complexity in a bottom-up process allowed them to engage in more transformative work.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [1] Agency and Institutions in Organization Studies
    Abdelnour, Samer
    Hasselbladh, Hans
    Kallinikos, Jannis
    [J]. ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2017, 38 (12) : 1775 - 1792
  • [2] Alexander S, 2018, THEOR PRACT URB SUST, P173, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-4792-3_10
  • [3] Avelino F., 2024, Urban Transformations, V6, P5
  • [4] Shifting Power Relations in Sustainability Transitions: A Multi-actor Perspective
    Avelino, Flor
    Wittmayer, Julia M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING, 2016, 18 (05) : 628 - 649
  • [5] From Rio to Rio+20: twenty years of participatory, long term oriented and monitored local planning?
    Barrutia, Jose M.
    Echebarria, Carmen
    Paredes, Mario R.
    Hartmann, Patrick
    Apaolaza, Vanessa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 106 : 594 - 607
  • [6] Battilana J, 2009, INSTITUTIONAL WORK: ACTORS AND AGENCY IN INSTITUTIONAL STUDIES OF ORGANIZATIONS, P31, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511596605.002
  • [7] Actors working the institutions in sustainability transitions: The case of Melbourne's stormwater management
    Brown, Rebekah R.
    Farrelly, Megan A.
    Loorbach, Derk A.
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2013, 23 (04): : 701 - 718
  • [8] Bulkeley H, 2015, URBAN POLITICS OF CLIMATE CHANGE: EXPERIMENTATION AND THE GOVERNING OF SOCIO-TECHNICAL TRANSITIONS, P1
  • [9] Bulkeley H., 2010, CITIES LOW CARBON TR