Who are marginalized in accessing urban ecosystem services? A systematic literature review

被引:9
作者
Haque, Md. Nazmul [1 ,2 ]
Sharifi, Ayyoob [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Humanities & Social Sci, Urban Environm Sci Lab URBES, Higashihiroshima, Japan
[2] Khulna Univ Engn & Technol, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, Khulna, Bangladesh
[3] Hiroshima Univ, IDEC Inst, 1-5-1 Kagamiyam, Higashihiroshima 7398529, Japan
[4] Hiroshima Univ, Network Educ & Res Peace & Sustainabil NERPS, 1-5-1 Kagamiyam, Higashihiroshima 7398529, Japan
[5] Lebanese Amer Univ, Sch Architecture & Design, Beirut, Lebanon
关键词
Access; Marginalization; Vulnerability; Justice; Ecosystem services; Urban resilience; ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; GREEN SPACE; METROPOLITAN-AREA; MANAGEMENT; HEALTH; PARKS; CITY; PERCEPTION; DISPARITY; ACCESSIBILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107266
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Urban ecosystems provide many crucial services to cities and their residents, particularly in adapting to the effects of climate change. Extensive research has been conducted in this field, covering various aspects of ecosystem services. However, little is known about issues related to the limited access to these ecosystem services, particularly among marginalized populations. This review systematically screened 3961 papers and synthesized findings from 98 papers to identify groups that are marginalized in terms of access to urban ecosystem services and provide policy measures to address the issue. We conducted an inductive content analysis and thematic analysis to review the literature comprehensively. Our findings revealed that marginalization is more prevalent in cultural ecosystem services (51 %) than in other ecosystem service types. The results also show that vulnerable populations, including minorities, low-income populations, physically challenged people, children/ young people/students, older people, and migrants, are particularly marginalized. Among these groups, minorities (24 %) emerged as the most extensively studied category. Additionally, we identified a marginalized group labeled as 'generic,' consisting of individuals whose identities did not neatly fit within the previously defined groups or were mentioned across multiple groups simultaneously.The marginalization across all these groups stems from income disparities, cultural norms, racial and ethnic considerations, willingness to visit, agerelated disparities, physical disabilities, and geographical location. Importantly, our study underscores the adverse effects of marginalization on these groups, leading to health disparities, lower quality of life, and reduced resilience to climate change. In light of these findings, we also spotlight policies from the literature such as inclusive urban planning, community engagement initiatives, and financial support aimed at ensuring more equitable access to urban ecosystem services.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Integrating sciences to sustain urban ecosystem services
    Lundy, L.
    Wade, R.
    PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY-EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 35 (05): : 653 - 669
  • [42] Conceptual diversity and application of ecosystem services and disservices: A systematic review
    Napoles-Vertiz, Sonia
    Caro-Borrero, Angela
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2024, 67
  • [43] Is urban resilience a phenomenon on the rise? A systematic literature review for the years 2019 and 2020 using textometry
    Bueno, Salvador
    Banuls, Victor A.
    Gallego, M. Dolores
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2021, 66
  • [44] Governance of ecosystem services: a review of empirical literature
    Winkler, Klara Johanna
    Garcia Rodrigues, Joao
    Albrecht, Eerika
    Crockett, Erin T. H.
    ECOSYSTEMS AND PEOPLE, 2021, 17 (01) : 306 - 319
  • [45] Cultural Heritage and Ecosystem Services: A Literature Review
    Holleland, Herdis
    Skrede, Joar
    Holmgaard, Sanne Bech
    CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES, 2017, 19 (03) : 210 - 237
  • [46] A systematic review on subjective well-being benefits associated with cultural ecosystem services
    Nowak-Olejnik, Agnieszka
    Schirpke, Uta
    Tappeiner, Ulrike
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2022, 57
  • [47] A review of methods for quantifying urban ecosystem services
    Ma, Yue
    Yang, Jun
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2025, 253
  • [48] Barriers and enablers to accessing dental services for people experiencing homelessness: A systematic review
    Paisi, Martha
    Kay, Elizabeth
    Plessas, Anastasios
    Burns, Lorna
    Quinn, Cath
    Brennan, Nicola
    White, Sandra
    COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 47 (02) : 103 - 111
  • [49] Climate change governance for urban resilience for Indonesia: A systematic literature review
    Abdillah, Abdillah
    Buchari, Rd Ahmad
    Widianingsih, Ida
    Nurasa, Heru
    COGENT SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2023, 9 (01):
  • [50] Ecosystem Services in the Milpa System: A Systematic Review
    Romero-Natale, Aline
    Acevedo-Sandoval, Otilio Arturo
    Sanchez-Porras, Arturo
    ONE ECOSYSTEM, 2024, 9