Who are marginalized in accessing urban ecosystem services? A systematic literature review

被引:9
作者
Haque, Md. Nazmul [1 ,2 ]
Sharifi, Ayyoob [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Humanities & Social Sci, Urban Environm Sci Lab URBES, Higashihiroshima, Japan
[2] Khulna Univ Engn & Technol, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, Khulna, Bangladesh
[3] Hiroshima Univ, IDEC Inst, 1-5-1 Kagamiyam, Higashihiroshima 7398529, Japan
[4] Hiroshima Univ, Network Educ & Res Peace & Sustainabil NERPS, 1-5-1 Kagamiyam, Higashihiroshima 7398529, Japan
[5] Lebanese Amer Univ, Sch Architecture & Design, Beirut, Lebanon
关键词
Access; Marginalization; Vulnerability; Justice; Ecosystem services; Urban resilience; ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; GREEN SPACE; METROPOLITAN-AREA; MANAGEMENT; HEALTH; PARKS; CITY; PERCEPTION; DISPARITY; ACCESSIBILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107266
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Urban ecosystems provide many crucial services to cities and their residents, particularly in adapting to the effects of climate change. Extensive research has been conducted in this field, covering various aspects of ecosystem services. However, little is known about issues related to the limited access to these ecosystem services, particularly among marginalized populations. This review systematically screened 3961 papers and synthesized findings from 98 papers to identify groups that are marginalized in terms of access to urban ecosystem services and provide policy measures to address the issue. We conducted an inductive content analysis and thematic analysis to review the literature comprehensively. Our findings revealed that marginalization is more prevalent in cultural ecosystem services (51 %) than in other ecosystem service types. The results also show that vulnerable populations, including minorities, low-income populations, physically challenged people, children/ young people/students, older people, and migrants, are particularly marginalized. Among these groups, minorities (24 %) emerged as the most extensively studied category. Additionally, we identified a marginalized group labeled as 'generic,' consisting of individuals whose identities did not neatly fit within the previously defined groups or were mentioned across multiple groups simultaneously.The marginalization across all these groups stems from income disparities, cultural norms, racial and ethnic considerations, willingness to visit, agerelated disparities, physical disabilities, and geographical location. Importantly, our study underscores the adverse effects of marginalization on these groups, leading to health disparities, lower quality of life, and reduced resilience to climate change. In light of these findings, we also spotlight policies from the literature such as inclusive urban planning, community engagement initiatives, and financial support aimed at ensuring more equitable access to urban ecosystem services.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Weaving notions of justice into urban ecosystem services research and practice
    Langemeyer, Johannes
    Connolly, James J. T.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2020, 109 : 1 - 14
  • [32] What is the economic value of coastal and marine ecosystem services? A systematic literature review
    Lopez-Rivas, Jose D.
    Cardenas, Juan-Camilo
    MARINE POLICY, 2024, 161
  • [33] Spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem services and their valuation across himalayas: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis
    Sharma, Prakhar
    Prashanth, Swathi S.
    Sharma, Ashutosh
    Sen, Sumit
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2025, 20 (01):
  • [34] The role of park size on ecosystem services in urban environment: a review
    Sari, Elif Nur
    Bayraktar, Selim
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2023, 195 (09)
  • [35] Integrating the third dimension into the concept of urban ecosystem services: A review
    Alavipanah, Sadroddin
    Haase, Dagmar
    Lakes, Tobia
    Qureshi, Salman
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2017, 72 : 374 - 398
  • [36] Ecosystem services and ecological compensation of world heritage: A literature review
    Fu, Yuanyuan
    Xiong, Kangning
    Zhang, Zhenzhen
    JOURNAL FOR NATURE CONSERVATION, 2021, 60
  • [37] The Function and Perception of Urban Ecosystem Services in the Society
    Edlund, Fredrik
    PROBLEMY EKOROZWOJU, 2020, 15 (01): : 15 - 23
  • [38] Integrating green infrastructure, ecosystem services and nature-based solutions for urban sustainability: A comprehensive literature review
    Fang, Xuening
    Li, Jingwei
    Ma, Qun
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2023, 98
  • [39] Ecosystem services and renewable power generation: A preliminary literature review
    Especie, Mariana de Assis
    de Carvalho, Pedro Nino
    Bacile Pinheiro, Maria Fernanda
    Rosenthal, Vinicius Mesquita
    Ferreira da Silva, Leyla A.
    de Carvalhaes Pinheiro, Mariana Rodrigues
    Espig, Silvana Andreoli
    Mariani, Carolina Fiorillo
    de Almeida, Elisangela Medeiros
    Abreu dos Santos Sodre, Federica Natasha Gananca
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2019, 140 : 39 - 51
  • [40] Systematic Review on Urban Ecosystem Services in South-East Asia: Asean Countries
    Rosehan, Nur Shazwanie
    Abas, Azlan
    Aiyub, Kadaruddin
    PROBLEMY EKOROZWOJU, 2022, 17 (01): : 256 - 266