Myths of romantic love and ambivalent sexism in adolescents

被引:0
|
作者
Cabrera, Eduardo MARTiN [1 ]
Betancor, angela T. O. R. B. A. Y. [1 ]
Sanchez, Jose Alexis A. L. O. N. S. O. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ La Laguna, Laguna, Philippines
[2] Univ Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Spain
来源
PEDAGOGIA SOCIAL REVISTA INTERUNIVERSITARIA | 2024年 / 45期
关键词
Adolescence; love; sex education; sexism; INVENTORY; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.7179/PSRI_2024.45.07
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The aim of this work was to analyze the prevalence of sexism and myths of romantic love among adolescents, as well as the relationship between both variables and their stability depending on age. 900 adolescents from public schools, of which 53.4 % were girls, between 13 and 17 years old, with an average of 15.2, completed the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory and the Love Myths Scale. The main results indicated that the scores differ between boys and girls, especially in the case of sexism, a variable in which the boys' scores were much higher than that of the girls. In relation to myths of romantic love, girls scored higher in myths related to the idealization of love, and boys in those that link love and abuse. Gender differences were found in the relationship between both variables and with age, although the prevalence does not vary much over time. It was concluded that factors such as pornography consumption, the proliferation of denialist ideas of gender violence and the absence of adequate affective-sexual education could be behind these results. It seems necessary to implement actions, from all areas, to ensure that adolescents internalize egalitarian values.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 148
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] When Contact Correlates with Prejudice: Adolescents’ Romantic Relationship Experience Predicts Greater Benevolent Sexism in Boys and Hostile Sexism in Girls
    Soledad de Lemus
    Miguel Moya
    Peter Glick
    Sex Roles, 2010, 63 : 214 - 225
  • [42] Acceptance of ambivalent sexism in trainee teachers in Spain and Latin American countries
    Bonilla-Algovia, Enrique
    ANALES DE PSICOLOGIA, 2021, 37 (02): : 253 - 264
  • [43] Construction and validation of the ambivalent sexism scale for children in educational institutions of Huanchaco
    Benites, Adolfo Benito Gastanadui
    REVISTA DE CLIMATOLOGIA, 2023, 23 : 1267 - 1277
  • [44] Construction and validation of the ambivalent sexism scale for children in educational institutions of Huanchaco
    Gastanadui Benites, Adolfo Benito
    REVISTA DE CLIMATOLOGIA, 2023, 23 : 1267 - 1277
  • [45] The dark side of sexism in Argentina: Psychometric properties of the Short Dark Triad Personality measure and its relation with ambivalent sexism
    Bria, Paula
    Etchezahar, Edgardo
    Ungaretti, Joaquin
    Yepes, Talia Gomez
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [46] Sexist attitudes, romantic myths, and offline dating violence as predictors of cyber dating violence perpetration in adolescents
    Cava, Maria-Jesus
    Martinez-Ferrer, Belen
    Buelga, Sofia
    Carrascosa, Laura
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2020, 111
  • [47] Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Adaptation to Basque Population and Sexism as a Risk Factor of Dating Violence
    Ibabe, Izaskun
    Arnoso, Ainara
    Elgorriaga, Edurne
    SPANISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 19
  • [48] DIDACTIC INSTRUMENT FOR GENDER ANALYSIS IN ROMANTIC FILMS: The presence of myths romantic love and abuse in "a tres metros sobre el cielo"
    Gonzalez Moreno, Maria Jose
    Cuenca Piqueras, Cristina
    Checa Olmos, Juan Carlos
    AULA DE ENCUENTRO, 2021, 23 (01): : 67 - 94
  • [49] Ambivalent Sexism Toward Teenage Girls. Validation of a German-Language Scale for Adolescents and Young Adults
    Ollrogge, Karen
    Rau, Melanie
    Hannover, Bettina
    DIAGNOSTICA, 2023, 69 (02): : 99 - 110
  • [50] Ambivalent sexism related to intimate partner violence: a review
    De Oliveira Ferreira, Monique Bernardes
    Morais Nogueira, Vania Maria
    Rosa Lourenco Trindade, Patricia Santa
    Moura Lourenco, Lelio
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEROS DE PSICOLOGIA, 2022, 74