Interpregnancy weight change and neonatal and infant outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Martinez-Hortelano, Jose Alberto [1 ]
Gonzalez, Patricia Blazquez [1 ]
Rodriguez-Rojo, Inmaculada Concepcion [1 ,3 ]
Garrido-Miguel, Miriam
Arenas-Arroyo, Sergio Nunez de [5 ]
Sequi-Dominguez, Irene [2 ,4 ]
Martinez-Vizcaino, Vicente [2 ,6 ,7 ]
Berlanga-Macias, Carlos [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alcala, Fac Enfermeria & Fisioterapia, Dept Enfermeria & Fisioterapia, Enfermeria Cuidado Comunitarioy Determinantes Soci, Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Hlth Care & Social Res Ctr, Cuenca, Spain
[3] Univ Complutense Madrid, Ctr Cognit & Computat Neurosci, Madrid, Spain
[4] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Fac Enfermeria Albacete, Albacete, Spain
[5] Network Res Chron Primary Care & Hlth Promot RICAP, Cuenca, Spain
[6] Univ Autonoma Chile, Fac Ciencias Salud, Talca, Chile
[7] Red Cross Univ, Dept Nursing, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Pregnancy; Body weight changes; Perinatal care; Stillbirth; Preterm birth; Large for gestational age; Small for gestational age; Macrosomia; BODY-MASS INDEX; PREGNANCY OUTCOMES; PRETERM BIRTH; 2ND PREGNANCY; RISK; OBESITY; ASSOCIATION; OVERWEIGHT; WOMEN; STILLBIRTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.annepidem.2024.07.002
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Purpose: To synthesize evidence regarding the association between interpregnancy weight change (IPWC) in consecutive pregnancies and neonatal or infant outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy. Methods: Search strategy was implemented in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Library from their inception to 13 November 2023. The most adjusted odds ratio (OR) or risk ratio estimates provided by original studies were used to calculate pooled risk ratios and their corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CI) with the DerSimonian and Laird random effects method. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plots and Egger 's method, and risk of bias was assessed with The Newcastle - Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Results: Thirty-seven observational studies were included. Interpregnancy weight loss or gain were associated with large for gestational age (OR: 0.89; 95 % CI: 0.84 -0.94; I 2 = 83.6 % and OR: 1.33; 95 % CI:1.26 -1.40; I 2 = 98.9 %), and stillbirth risk (OR: 1.10; 95 % CI: 1.01 -1.18; I 2 = 0.0 % and OR: 1.21; 95 % CI: 1.09 -1.33; I 2 = 60.2 %,). Conclusions: Findings highlight the importance of managing weight between interpregnancy periods, although these findings should be interpreted cautiously because of the possible influence of social determinants of health and other factors.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The impact of interpregnancy weight change on perinatal outcomes in women and their children: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Timmermans, Yvon E. G.
    van de Kant, Kim D. G.
    Oosterman, Elise O.
    Spaanderman, Marc E. A.
    Villamor-Martinez, Eduardo
    Kleijnen, Jos
    Vreugdenhil, Anita C. E.
    OBESITY REVIEWS, 2020, 21 (03)
  • [2] Effect of interpregnancy weight change on perinatal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Teulings, Noor E. W. D.
    Masconi, Katya L.
    Ozanne, Susan E.
    Aiken, Catherine E.
    Wood, Angela M.
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [3] Interpregnancy weight change and perinatal outcomes A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Alberto Martinez-Hortelano, Jose
    Berlanga-Macias, Carlos
    Patricia Pozuelo-Carrascosa, Diana
    Sanabria-Martinez, Gema
    Poyatos-Leon, Raquel
    Martinez-Vizcaino, Vicente
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (20)
  • [4] Interpregnancy weight change and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Oteng-Ntim, Eugene
    Mononen, Sofia
    Sawicki, Olga
    Seed, Paul T.
    Bick, Debra
    Poston, Lucilla
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (06):
  • [5] Gestational weight gain across continents and ethnicity: systematic review and meta-analysis of maternal and infant outcomes in more than one million women
    Goldstein, Rebecca F.
    Abell, Sally K.
    Ranasinha, Sanjeeva
    Misso, Marie L.
    Boyle, Jacqueline A.
    Harrison, Cheryce L.
    Black, Mary Helen
    Li, Nan
    Hu, Gang
    Corrado, Francesco
    Hegaard, Hanne
    Kim, Young Ju
    Haugen, Margaretha
    Song, Won O.
    Kim, Min Hyoung
    Bogaerts, Annick
    Devlieger, Roland
    Chung, Judith H.
    Teede, Helena J.
    BMC MEDICINE, 2018, 16
  • [6] Interpregnancy interval following miscarriage and adverse pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kangatharan, Chrishny
    Labram, Saffi
    Bhattacharya, Sohinee
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2017, 23 (02) : 221 - 231
  • [7] Interpregnancy weight change and risks of stillbirth and infant mortality: a protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tang, Yu
    Islam, Nabil
    Luo, Rong
    Wen, Shi Wu
    Guo, Yanfang
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (12):
  • [8] Interpregnancy Weight Change and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Martinez-Hortelano, Jose Alberto
    Cavero-Redondo, Ivan
    Alvarez-Bueno, Celia
    Diez-Fernandez, Ana
    Hernandez-Luengo, Montserrat
    Martinez-Vizcaino, Vicente
    OBESITY, 2021, 29 (02) : 454 - 464
  • [9] Effect of interpregnancy weight change on perinatal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Noor E. W. D. Teulings
    Katya L. Masconi
    Susan E. Ozanne
    Catherine E. Aiken
    Angela M. Wood
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 19
  • [10] Gestational weight gain below instead of within the guidelines per class of maternal obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of obstetrical and neonatal outcomes
    Mustafa, Hiba J.
    Seif, Karl
    Javinani, Ali
    Aghajani, Faezeh
    Orlinsky, Rachel
    Alvarez, Maria Vera
    Ryan, Amanda
    Crimmins, Sarah
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2022, 4 (05)