Aligning incentives for implementing reversible bonding as a circular economy innovation

被引:2
|
作者
Van Opstal, Wim [1 ,2 ]
Smeets, Anse [1 ]
Pals, Emma [1 ]
机构
[1] VITO, Unit Sustainable Mat & Chem, 200 Boeretang, B-2400 Mol, Belgium
[2] Maastricht Univ, Maastricht Sustainabil Inst, Sch Business & Econ, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
circular economy; circular intrapreneurship; circular supply chains; market failures; reversible bonding; split incentive problem; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; SUPPLY CHAIN; COLLABORATION; MANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE; TRANSITION; FAILURES; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1002/bse.3904
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A transition towards a circular economy (CE) often involves the development and adoption of novel technologies and business models. Its implementation, however, requires a close collaboration within and between organizations along supply chains. In this paper, we investigate incentive alignment for the implementation of reversible bonding, a technique that enables separating materials on demand. We use data from semi-structured interviews with supply chain actors in manufacturing and construction and identify its potential for process optimization and improved repair, refurbishment, and recycling opportunities. Quality, safety, and performance are identified as the most important boundary conditions while split incentive problems tend to impede the implementation of reversible bonding. Switch costs, a lacking market demand, and insufficient mandatory regulations cause split incentive problems, which may be aggravated or mitigated by several market imperfections. Recommendations include investing in collaborative capabilities within organizations and an ex-ante identification of split incentive problems when constructing circular supply chain governance mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:8017 / 8036
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Factors implementing sustainable circular economy in agro-produce supply chain: DEMATEL-DANP-based approach
    Avikal, Shwetank
    Pant, Rushali
    Barthwal, Anurag
    Ram, Mangey
    Upadhyay, Rajesh Kumar
    MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2023, 34 (04) : 1158 - 1173
  • [32] Challenges to implementing circular economy: empirical evidence among built environment firms in Ghana
    Agyekum, Kofi
    Amudjie, Judith
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24 (03) : 281 - 297
  • [33] How circular economy transforms business models in a transition towards circular ecosystem: the barriers and incentives
    Asgari, Amir
    Asgari, Reza
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2021, 28 : 566 - 579
  • [34] Implementing circular economy principles: evidence from multiple cases
    Liu, Zheng
    Clifton, Nick
    Faqdani, Homeira
    Li, Songdi
    Walpole, Gary
    PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2024,
  • [35] Battery innovation and the Circular Economy: What are patents revealing?
    Metzger, Philipp
    Mendonca, Sandro
    Silva, Jose A.
    Damasio, Bruno
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2023, 209 : 516 - 532
  • [36] Challenges of Implementing Reverse Logistics in Ensuring Circular Economy Goals
    Vasiliauskas, Aidas Vasilis
    Navickiene, Olga
    TRANSBALTICA XIV: TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 2024, : 486 - 494
  • [37] Circular economy in firms' strategies-What are the determinants of eco-innovation?
    Massapina, Maria
    Meireles, Monica
    Madaleno, Mara
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [38] On the contribution of eco-innovation features to a circular economy: A microlevel quantitative approach
    Kiefer, Christoph P.
    del Rio, Pablo
    Carrillo-Hermosilla, Javier
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 30 (04) : 1531 - 1547
  • [39] Degrowth within - Aligning circular economy and strong sustainability narratives
    Schroder, Patrick
    Bengtsson, Magnus
    Cohen, Maurie
    Dewick, Paul
    Hoffstetter, Joerg
    Sarkis, Joseph
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2019, 146 : 190 - 191
  • [40] Institutional Innovation under Circular Economy
    Ma Chi
    Zhou Lin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ELEVENTH WEST LAKE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMALL & MEDIUM BUSINESS, 2010, : 78 - 81