GLIM Achieves Best Diagnostic Performance in Non-Cancer Patients with Low BMI: A Hierarchical Bayesian Latent-Class Meta-Analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Wu, Tiantian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhou, Mingming [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xu, Kedi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zou, Yuanlin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Shaobo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cheng, Haoqing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guo, Pengxia [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Song, Chunhua [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Stat, Kexue Rd 100, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Zhengzhou Univ, Henan Key Lab Tumor Epidemiol, Zhengzhou 450052, Henan, Peoples R China
[3] Zhengzhou Univ, State Key Lab Esophageal Canc Prevent & Treatment, Zhengzhou 450052, Henan, Peoples R China
关键词
malnutrition; GLIM; PG-SGA; sensitivity; specificity; PG-SGA; CANCER-PATIENTS; MALNUTRITION CRITERIA; LATIN-AMERICA; TEST ACCURACY; VALIDATION; VALIDITY; TOOL; ASSOCIATION; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1093/nutrit/nuae096
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Context: Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) and Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) are commonly used nutrition assessment tools, whose performance does not reach a consensus due to different and imperfect reference standards. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of GLIM and PG-SGA, using a hierarchical Bayesian latent class model, in the absence of a gold standard. Data Sources: A systematic search was undertaken in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from inception to October 2022. Diagnostic test studies comparing (1) the GLIM and/or (2) PG-SGA with "semi-gold" standard assessment tools for malnutrition were included. Data Extraction: Two authors independently extracted data on sensitivity, specificity, and other key characteristics. The methodological quality of each included study was appraised according to the criteria in the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. Data Analysis: A total of 45 studies, comprising 20 876 individuals evaluated for GLIM and 11 575 for PG-SGA, were included. The pooled sensitivity was 0.833 (95% CI 0.744 to 0.896) for GLIM and 0.874 (0.797 to 0.925) for PG-SGA, while the pooled specificity was 0.837 (0.780 to 0.882) for GLIM and 0.778 (0.707 to 0.836) for PG-SGA. GLIM showed slightly better performance than PG-SGA, with a higher diagnostic odds ratio (25.791 vs 24.396). The diagnostic performance of GLIM was most effective in non-cancer patients with an average body mass index (BMI) of <24 kg/m(2), followed by non-cancer patients with an average age of >= 60 years. PG-SGA was most powerful in cancer patients with an average age of <60 years, followed by cancer patients with an average BMI of <24 kg/m(2). Conclusion: Both GLIM and PG-SGA had moderately high diagnostic capabilities. GLIM was most effective in non-cancer patients with a low BMI, while PG-SGA was more applicable in cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:e877 / e891
页数:15
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Nutritional screening tools for adult cancer patients: A hierarchical Bayesian latent-class meta-analysis
    Ruan, Xiaoli
    Nakyeyune, Rena
    Shao, Yi
    Shen, Yi
    Niu, Chen
    Zang, Zhaoping
    Miles, Toni
    Liu, Fen
    CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2021, 40 (04) : 1733 - 1743
  • [2] Accuracy of objective tests for diagnosing adult asthma in symptomatic patients: A systematic literature review and hierarchical Bayesian latent-class meta-analysis
    Sano, Hiroyuki
    Tomita, Katsuyuki
    Sano, Akiko
    Saeki, Shou
    Nishikawa, Yusaku
    Nishiyama, Osamu
    Iwanaga, Takashi
    Tohda, Yuji
    ALLERGOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 68 (02) : 191 - 198
  • [3] Diagnostic accuracy of clinical illness for bovine respiratory disease (BRD) diagnosis in beef cattle placed in feedlots: A systematic literature review and hierarchical Bayesian latent-class meta-analysis
    Timsit, E.
    Dendukuri, N.
    Schiller, I.
    Buczinski, S.
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2016, 135 : 67 - 73
  • [4] Diagnostic performance of GLIM and PG-SGA for malnutrition assessment in adult cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jielin Zhou
    Shoumei Yang
    Ting Liu
    Yubei Sun
    Suyi Li
    BMC Cancer, 25 (1)
  • [5] Evaluation of the Accuracy of Cognitive Screening Tests in Detecting Dementia Associated with Alzheimer's Disease: A Hierarchical Bayesian Latent Class Meta-Analysis
    Wang, Xiaonan
    Li, Fengjie
    Gao, Qi
    Jiang, Zhen
    Abudusaimaiti, Xiayidanmu
    Yao, Jiangyue
    Zhu, Huiping
    JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2022, 87 (01) : 285 - 304
  • [6] Evaluating the accuracy of a nutritional screening tool for patients with digestive system tumors: A hierarchical Bayesian latent class meta-analysis
    Yang, Menghao
    Xiao, Na
    Tang, Le
    Zhang, Yang
    Wen, Yuexiu
    Yang, Xiuqin
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (12):
  • [7] Diagnostic Performance of SGA, PG-SGA and MUST for Malnutrition Assessment in Adult Cancer Patients: A Systematic Literature Review and Hierarchical Bayesian Meta-Analysis
    Nakyeyune, Rena
    Ruan, Xiaoli
    Shen, Yi
    Shao, Yi
    Niu, Chen
    Zang, Zhaoping
    Liu, Fen
    NUTRITION AND CANCER-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2022, 74 (03): : 903 - 915
  • [8] Prevalence of sleep disturbances in patients with chronic non-cancer pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sun, Yishi
    Laksono, Isabelle
    Selvanathan, Janannii
    Saripella, Aparna
    Nagappa, Mahesh
    Chi Pham
    Englesakis, Marina
    Peng, Philip
    Morin, Charles M.
    Chung, Frances
    SLEEP MEDICINE REVIEWS, 2021, 57
  • [9] Prevalence of problematic pharmaceutical opioid use in patients with chronic non-cancer pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Thomas, Kyla H.
    Dalili, Michael N.
    Cheng, Hung-Yuan
    Dawson, Sarah
    Donnelly, Nick
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Hickman, Matthew
    ADDICTION, 2024, 119 (11) : 1904 - 1922
  • [10] Diagnostic performance of MR imaging in evaluating prognostic factors in patients with cervical cancer: a meta-analysis
    Xiao, Meiling
    Yan, Bicong
    Li, Ying
    Lu, Jingjing
    Qiang, Jinwei
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (03) : 1405 - 1418