Twitter-based economic uncertainties and time-frequency connectedness among cryptocurrencies

被引:0
作者
Kocoglu, Mustafa [1 ]
Nghiem, Xuan-Hoa [2 ]
Nikbakht, Ehsan [3 ]
机构
[1] Erciyes Univ, Kayseri, Turkiye
[2] Vietnam Natl Univ, Int Sch, Hanoi, Vietnam
[3] Hofstra Univ, Frank G Zarb Sch Business, Hempstead, NY 11549 USA
关键词
Cryptocurrencies; Risk spillover; Safe-haven; Time-frequency connectedness; Wavelet quantile correlation; VOLATILITY SPILLOVERS; BITCOIN; ENERGY; MARKETS; DYNAMICS; RETURNS; HEDGE;
D O I
10.1108/MF-03-2024-0229
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
PurposeIn this study, we aim to investigate the connectedness spillovers among major cryptocurrency markets. Moreover, we also explore to identify factors driving this connectedness, particularly focusing on the sentimentality of total, short-term, and long-term return connectedness spillovers among cryptocurrencies under Twitter-based economic uncertainties and US economic policy uncertainty. Finally, we investigate the extent to which cryptocurrency markets serve as a safe haven, hedge, and diversifier from news-based uncertainties.Design/methodology/approachThis study employs the connectedness approach following the combination of Ando et al. (2022) QVAR and Barun & iacute;k and Krehl & iacute;k's (2018) frequency connectedness methodologies into the framework proposed by Diebold and Yilmaz (2012, 2014). The data covered from November 10, 2017, to April 21, 2023, and the factors driving cryptocurrency connectedness spillovers are identified and examined. The sentimentality of total, short-term, and long-term return connectedness spillovers among cryptocurrencies, concerning Twitter-based economic uncertainties and US economic policy uncertainty, are analyzed. We apply the Wavelet quantile correlation (WQC) method developed by Kumar and Padakandla (2022) to explore the effects of Twitter-based economic uncertainties and US economic policy uncertainty on Cryptocurrency market connectedness risk spillovers. Besides, we check and present the robustness of WQC findings with the multivariate stochastic volatility method.FindingsOur findings indicate that Ethereum and Bitcoin are net shock transmitters at the center of the connectedness return network. Ethereum and Bitcoin hold the highest market capitalization and value in the cryptocurrency market, respectively. This suggests that return shocks originating from these two cryptocurrencies have the most significant impact on other cryptocurrencies. Tether and Monero are the net receivers of return shocks, while Cardano and XRP exhibit weak shock-transmitting characteristics through returns. In terms of return spillovers, Ethereum is the most effective, followed by Bitcoin and Stellar. Further analysis reveals that Twitter economic policy uncertainty and US economic policy uncertainty are effective drivers of short-term and total directional spillovers. These uncertainty indices exhibit positive coefficient signs in short-term and total directional spillovers, which turn predominantly negative in different magnitudes and frequency ranges in the long term. In addition, we also document that as the Total Connectedness Index (TCI) value increases, market risk also rises. Also, our empirical findings provide significant evidence of Twitter-based economic uncertainties and US economic policy uncertainty that affect short-term market risks. Hence, we state that risk-connectedness spillovers in cryptocurrency markets enclose permanent or temporary shock variations. Besides, findings of the low value of long-term spillovers suggest that risk shocks in cryptocurrency markets are not permanent, indicating long-term changes require careful monitoring and control over market dynamics.Practical implicationsIn this study, we find evidence that Twitter's news-based uncertainty and US economic policy uncertainty have a significant effect on short-term market risk spillovers. Furthermore, we observe that high cryptocurrency market risk spillovers coincide with periods of events such as the US-China trade tensions in January 2018, the Brexit process in February 2019, and the COVID-19 outbreak in November 2019. Next, we observe a decline in cryptocurrency market risk spillovers after March 2020. The reason for this mitigation of market risk spillover may be that the Fed's quantitative easing signals have initiated a relaxation process in the markets. Because the Fed's signal to fight inflation in March 2022 also coincides with the period when risk spillover increased in crypto markets. Based on this, we present evidence that the FED's communication mechanism with the markets can potentially affect both short- and long-term expectations. In this context, we can say that our hypothesis that uncertainty about the news causes short-term risks to increase has been confirmed. Our findings may have investment policy implications for portfolio managers and investors generally in terms of reducing financial risks.Originality/valueOur paper contributes to the literature by examining the interconnectedness among major cryptocurrencies and the drivers behind them, particularly focusing on the role of news-based economic uncertainties. More broadly, we calculate the utilization of advanced methodologies and the incorporation of real-time economic uncertainty data to enhance the originality and value of the research, which provides insights into the dynamics of cryptocurrency markets.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 87 条
  • [41] Does Bitcoin exhibit the same asymmetric multifractal cross-correlations with crude oil, gold and DJIA as the Euro, Great British Pound and Yen?
    Gajardo, Gabriel
    Kristjanpoller, Werner D.
    Minutolo, Marcel
    [J]. CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS, 2018, 109 : 195 - 205
  • [42] Discontinuous movements and asymmetries in cryptocurrency markets
    Gkillas, Konstantinos
    Katsiampa, Paraskevi
    Konstantatos, Christoforos
    Tsagkanos, Athanasios
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2024, 30 (16) : 1907 - 1931
  • [43] Cryptodamages: Monetary value estimates of the air pollution and human health impacts of cryptocurrency mining
    Goodkind, Andrew L.
    Jones, Benjamin A.
    Berrens, Robert P.
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2020, 59
  • [44] The relationship between Bitcoin returns and trade policy uncertainty
    Gozgor, Giray
    Tiwari, Aviral Kumar
    Demir, Ender
    Akron, Sagi
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 29 : 75 - 82
  • [45] Cryptocurrencies and global sustainability: do blockchained sectors have distinctive effects?
    Gunay, Samet
    Sraieb, Mohamed M.
    Kaskaloglu, Kerem
    Yildiz, Mehmet Emin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 425
  • [46] Hosszejni D., 2019, arXiv
  • [47] The response of green energy and technology investment to climate policy uncertainty: An application of twin transitions strategy
    Husain, Shaiara
    Sohag, Kazi
    Wu, Yanrui
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2022, 71
  • [48] The role of interpersonal trust in cryptocurrency adoption
    Jalan, Akanksha
    Matkovskyy, Roman
    Urquhart, Andrew
    Yarovaya, Larisa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2023, 83
  • [49] EFFICIENT TESTS FOR NORMALITY, HOMOSCEDASTICITY AND SERIAL INDEPENDENCE OF REGRESSION RESIDUALS
    JARQUE, CM
    BERA, AK
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1980, 6 (03) : 255 - 259
  • [50] Information interdependence among energy, cryptocurrency and major commodity markets
    Ji, Qiang
    Bouri, Elie
    Roubaud, David
    Kristoufek, Ladislav
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 81 : 1042 - 1055