External validation and comparative analysis of the HOSPITAL score and LACE index for predicting readmissions among patients hospitalised with community-acquired pneumonia in Australia

被引:0
|
作者
Sharma, Yogesh [1 ,2 ]
Mangoni, Arduino A. [2 ]
Horwood, Chris [1 ]
Thompson, Campbell [3 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Med Ctr, Dept Acute & Gen Med, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Flinders Univ S Australia, Coll Med & Publ Hlth, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Univ Adelaide, Discipline Med, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
Australian health care; community-acquired pneumonia; HOSPITAL score; LACE index; readmission; MEDICAL PATIENTS; RISK; PERFORMANCE; VALIDITY; MODELS;
D O I
10.1071/AH24204
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a leading cause of emergency hospitalisations globally and is associated with high readmission rates. Specific score systems developed for all medical conditions such as the HOSPITAL score and the LACE index can also usefully predict CAP readmissions. However, there is limited evidence regarding their performance in the Australian healthcare settings. Methods This multicentre retrospective study analysed adult CAP discharges from two metropolitan hospitals in South Australia between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2023. Data for determining the HOSPITAL score and the LACE index were derived from electronic medical records. Demographic characteristics of patients readmitted within 30 days were compared with those who were not readmitted. The scores were evaluated for overall performance, discriminatory power and calibration, with discriminatory power assessed using the concordance statistic (C-statistic). Results Over 6 years, 7245 CAP discharges were recorded, with 1329 (18.3%) readmissions within 30 days. The mean (s.d.) age of the cohort was 74.4 (17.8) years. Readmitted patients were more likely to have multiple morbidities and frailty than those not readmitted (P < 0.05). They also had a higher mean number of emergency department presentations and hospital admissions in the previous year and a longer initial hospital stay (P < 0.05). Overall, the mean (s.d.) HOSPITAL score and LACE index were 3.4 (2.1) and 9.3 (3.6), respectively. Among readmissions, 28.4% occurred in patients with a HOSPITAL score >4 (intermediate and high-risk group), while 25.8% occurred in patients in the high-risk LACE category (LACE index > 10). The C-statistic for the HOSPITAL score and LACE index was 0.62 (95% CI 0.61-0.64) and 0.63 (95% CI 0.61-0.65), respectively, with no significant difference in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (P > 0.05). Conclusions The predictive abilities of the HOSPITAL score and the LACE index for CAP readmissions are modest and comparable in an Australian setting.
引用
收藏
页码:656 / 663
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ability of the LACE index to predict 30-day hospital readmissions in patients with community-acquired pneumonia
    Dobler, Claudia C.
    Hakim, Maryam
    Singh, Sidhartha
    Jennings, Matthew
    Waterer, Grant
    Garden, Frances L.
    ERJ OPEN RESEARCH, 2020, 6 (02) : 1 - 8
  • [2] Prospective evaluation of pneumonia severity index in hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia
    van der Eerden, MM
    de Graaff, CS
    Bronsveld, W
    Jansen, HM
    Boersma, WG
    RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2004, 98 (09) : 872 - 878
  • [3] External validation of the CURSI criteria (confusion, urea, respiratory rate and shock index) in adults hospitalised for community-acquired pneumonia
    Harald Nüllmann
    Marc Andre Pflug
    Thomas Wesemann
    Hans-Jürgen Heppner
    Ludger Pientka
    Ulrich Thiem
    BMC Infectious Diseases, 14
  • [4] External validation of the CURSI criteria (confusion, urea, respiratory rate and shock index) in adults hospitalised for community-acquired pneumonia
    Nuellmann, Harald
    Pflug, Marc Andre
    Wesemann, Thomas
    Heppner, Hans-Juergen
    Pientka, Ludger
    Thiem, Ulrich
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2014, 14
  • [5] Validation of the Pneumonia Severity Index for admission decision in patients with community-acquired pneumonia
    Querol-Ribelles, JM
    Tenías, JM
    Borrás, JMQ
    González-Granda, D
    Hernández, M
    Ferreruela, R
    Martíneza, I
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 2004, 122 (13): : 481 - 486
  • [6] Validation of JRS atypical pneumonia score in patients with community-acquired Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia
    Miyashita, Naoyuki
    Nakamori, Yasushi
    Ogata, Makoto
    Fukuda, Naoki
    Yamura, Akihisa
    Ishiura, Yoshihisa
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2023, 29 (09) : 863 - 868
  • [7] Association between body mass index and mortality in hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia
    Kim, Richard Y.
    Glick, Connor
    Furmanek, Stephen
    Ramirez, Julio A.
    Cavallazzi, Rodrigo
    ERJ OPEN RESEARCH, 2021, 7 (01)
  • [8] Validation of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score in older adults hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia
    Rosario, Barbara H.
    Quah, Jessica Lishan
    Chang, Ting Yu
    Barrera, Vivian Cantiller
    Lim, Aileen
    Sim, Lydia Euphemia
    Conroy, Simon
    Dhaliwal, Trishpal Kaur
    GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 24 : 135 - 141
  • [9] A validation and potential modification of the pneumonia severity index in elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia
    Naito, Tateaki
    Suda, Takafumi
    Yasuda, Kazumasa
    Yamada, Takashi
    Todate, Akihito
    Tsuchiya, Tomoyoshi
    Sato, Jun
    Chida, Kingo
    Nakamura, Hirotoshi
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2006, 54 (08) : 1212 - 1219
  • [10] Pulmonary tuberculosis among patients hospitalised with community-acquired pneumonia in a tuberculosis-prevalent area
    Chon, S-B
    Kim, T. S.
    Oh, W. S.
    Lee, S-J
    Han, S. S.
    Kim, W. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TUBERCULOSIS AND LUNG DISEASE, 2013, 17 (12) : 1626 - 1631