Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) Trifecta Learning Curve for Surgeons with Previous Experience in Laparoscopy

被引:1
|
作者
Carlos, Altez-Fernandez [1 ]
Dario, Vazquez-Martul [1 ]
Popescu, Razvan-Ionut [2 ,3 ]
Mariela, Corrales [4 ]
Venancio, Chantada-Abal [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp La Coruna, Serv Urol, La Coruna 15006, Spain
[2] Carol Davila Univ Med & Pharm, Dept Urol, Bucharest 050474, Romania
[3] Prof Dr Th Burghele Clin Hosp, Dept Urol, Bucharest 061344, Romania
[4] Sorbonne Univ, Hop Tenon, AP HP, Serv Urol, F-75005 Paris, France
来源
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA | 2024年 / 60卷 / 07期
关键词
laparoscopic prostatectomy; learning curve; trifecta; robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.3390/medicina60071032
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is a complex surgery with a steep learning curve (LC). No clear evidence exists for how previous laparoscopic experience affects the RARP LC. We report the LC of three surgeons with vast experience in laparoscopy (more than 400 procedures), analyzing the results of functional and oncological outcomes under the "Trifecta" concept (defined as the achievement of continence, potency, and oncological control free of biochemical recurrence). Materials and Methods: The surgical experience of the three surgeons from September 2021 to December 2022, involving 146 RARP consecutive patients in a single institution center, was evaluated prospectively. Erectile disfunction patients were excluded. ANOVA and chi-square test were used to compare the distribution of variables between the three surgeons. LC analysis was performed using the cumulative sum control chart (CUSUM) technique to achieve trifecta. Results: The median age was 65.42 (+/- 7.34); the clinical stage were T1c (68%) and T2a (32%); the biopsy grades were ISUP 1 (15.9%), ISUP 2 (47.98), and >= ISUP 3 (35%). The median surgical time was 132.8 (+/- 32.8), and the mean intraoperative bleeding was 186 cc (+/- 115). Complications included the following: Clavien-Dindo I 8/146 (5.47%); II 9/146 (6.16%); and III 3/146 (2.05%). Positive margins were reported in 44/146 (30.13%). The PSA of 145/146 patients (99%) at 6 months was below 0.08. Early continence was achieved in 101/146 (69.17%), 6-month continence 126/146 (86%), early potency 51/146 (34.9%), and 6-month potency 65/146 (44%). Surgeons "a", "b", and "c" performed 50, 47, and 49 cases, respectively. After CUSUM analysis, the "Trifecta" LC peak was achieved at case 19 in surgeon "a", 21 in surgeon "b", and 20 in surgeon "c". Conclusions: RARP LC to accomplish "Trifecta" can be significantly reduced in surgeons with previous experience in laparoscopy and be achieved at around 20 cases.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The role of a well-trained team on the early learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures: the example of radical prostatectomy
    Lebeau, Thierry
    Roupret, Morgan
    Ferhi, Karim
    Chartier-Kastler, Emmanuel
    Bitker, Marc-Olivier
    Richard, Francois
    Vaessen, Christophe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2012, 8 (01) : 67 - 72
  • [32] How May Longer Console Times Influence Outcomes after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP)?
    Farzat, Mahmoud
    Elsherif, Mohamed
    Wagenlehner, Florian M. M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (12)
  • [33] Outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Challacombe, Benjamin J.
    Costello, Anthony J.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2009, 11 (01) : 94 - 99
  • [34] Cumulative sum analysis of the learning curve of laparoendoscopic single-site robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Lee, Ming-Ru
    Li, Wei-Ming
    Li, Ching-Chia
    Chou, Yii-Her
    Wu, Wen-Jeng
    Juan, Yung-Shun
    Ke, Hung-Lung
    Wen, Sheng-Chen
    Lee, Hsiang-Ying
    Chien, Tsu-Ming
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 46 (09) : 3614 - 3619
  • [35] Initial experience of teaching robot-assisted radical prostatectomy to surgeons-in-training: can training be evaluated and standardized?
    Davis, John W.
    Kamat, Ashish
    Munsell, Mark
    Pettaway, Curtis
    Pisters, Louis
    Matin, Surena
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 105 (08) : 1148 - 1154
  • [36] A brief overview of the development of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Hakenberg, Oliver W.
    ARAB JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 16 (03) : 293 - 296
  • [37] Comparison of oncological outcomes between retropubic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis stratified by surgical experience
    Park, Jinsung
    Yoo, Dae-Seon
    Song, Cheryn
    Park, Sahyun
    Park, Sejun
    Kim, Seong Cheol
    Cho, Yongmee
    Ahn, Hanjong
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 32 (01) : 193 - 199
  • [38] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Perioperative complications, pathological results and functional results during the learning curve
    Laroche, J.
    Walz, J.
    Marcy, M.
    Salem, N.
    Gravis, G.
    Savoie, P. -H.
    Methorst, C.
    Karsenty, G.
    Bladou, F.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2010, 20 (08): : 590 - 596
  • [39] Impact of body mass index on perioperative outcomes during the learning curve for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Chalasani, Venu
    Martinez, Carlos H.
    Lim, Darwin
    Al Bareeq, Reem
    Wignall, Geoffrey R.
    Stitt, Larry
    Pautler, Stephen E.
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2010, 4 (04): : 250 - 254
  • [40] Transvesical robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: initial experience and surgical outcomes
    Zhou, Xiaochen
    Fu, Bin
    Zhang, Cheng
    Liu, Weipeng
    Guo, Ju
    Chen, Luyao
    Lei, Enjun
    Zhang, Xu
    Wang, Gongxian
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 126 (02) : 300 - 308