Sensitivity analysis for publication bias in meta-analysis of sparse data based on exact likelihood

被引:0
作者
Hu, Taojun [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Yi [3 ]
Hattori, Satoshi [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Biomed Stat, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
[2] Peking Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ, Beijing Int Ctr Math Res, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[4] Osaka Univ, Inst Open & Transdisciplinary Res Initiat OTRI, Integrated Frontier Res Med Sci Div, Osaka 5650871, Japan
关键词
generalized linear mixed model; meta-analysis of sparse data; publication bias; research synthesis; selection function; sensitivity analysis; STATISTICAL-METHODS; SAMPLE SELECTION; CLINICAL-TRIALS; MODEL; FILL; TRIM;
D O I
10.1093/biomtc/ujae092
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Meta-analysis is a powerful tool to synthesize findings from multiple studies. The normal-normal random-effects model is widely used to account for between-study heterogeneity. However, meta-analyses of sparse data, which may arise when the event rate is low for binary or count outcomes, pose a challenge to the normal-normal random-effects model in the accuracy and stability in inference since the normal approximation in the within-study model may not be good. To reduce bias arising from data sparsity, the generalized linear mixed model can be used by replacing the approximate normal within-study model with an exact model. Publication bias is one of the most serious threats in meta-analysis. Several quantitative sensitivity analysis methods for evaluating the potential impacts of selective publication are available for the normal-normal random-effects model. We propose a sensitivity analysis method by extending the likelihood-based sensitivity analysis with the $t$-statistic selection function of Copas to several generalized linear mixed-effects models. Through applications of our proposed method to several real-world meta-analyses and simulation studies, the proposed method was proven to outperform the likelihood-based sensitivity analysis based on the normal-normal model. The proposed method would give useful guidance to address publication bias in the meta-analysis of sparse data.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Meta-analysis of binary outcomes via generalized linear mixed models: a simulation study [J].
Bakbergenuly, Ilyas ;
Kulinskaya, Elena .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2018, 18
[2]   PUBLICATION BIAS - A PROBLEM IN INTERPRETING MEDICAL DATA [J].
BEGG, CB ;
BERLIN, JA .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 1988, 151 :419-463
[3]   Meta-analysis of clinical trials with rare events [J].
Boehning, Dankmar ;
Mylona, Kalliopi ;
Kimber, Alan .
BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 57 (04) :633-648
[4]   Meta-analysis for rare events [J].
Cai, Tianxi ;
Parast, Layla ;
Ryan, Louise .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2010, 29 (20) :2078-2089
[5]   What works?: selectivity models and meta-analysis [J].
Copas, J .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 1999, 162 :95-109
[6]  
Copas J, 2000, Biostatistics, V1, P247, DOI 10.1093/biostatistics/1.3.247
[7]   A sensitivity analysis for publication bias in systematic reviews [J].
Copas, JB ;
Shi, JQ .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2001, 10 (04) :251-265
[8]   A likelihood-based sensitivity analysis for publication bias in meta-analysis [J].
Copas, John B. .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 2013, 62 (01) :47-66
[9]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[10]   Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: An update [J].
DerSimonian, Rebecca ;
Kacker, Raghu .
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2007, 28 (02) :105-114