Palm oil expansion, insecure land rights, and land-use conflict: A case of palm oil centre of Riau, Indonesia

被引:0
作者
Afrizal [1 ]
Putra, Eka Vidya [2 ]
Elida, Linda [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Andalas, Fac Social & Polit Sci, Dept Sociol, Padang, Indonesia
[2] Univ Negeri Padang, Dept Pendidikan Sosiol, Padang, Indonesia
[3] Univ Sumatera Utara, Fac Social & Polit Sci, Dept Sociol, Medan, Indonesia
关键词
Insecure land rights; Land conflicts; Land-use change; Palm Oil; Indonesia; PROPERTY-RIGHTS; DEFORESTATION; PLANTATIONS; MEDIATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107325
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Insecure rights tend to lead to land-use conflicts. The literature mainly focuses on the impact of insecure land rights on investment. Regarding the causes, studies mainly focus on the effect of state regulations. Little attention is given to the impact of the extractive economy on land rights security. This article scrutinizes how palm oil expansion manipulates insecure land rights, leading to land-use conflict. We pay attention to a particular land right in Indonesia that is based on the<acute accent>land status letter<acute accent>(Surat Keterangan Tanah, SKT), an initial proof of land ownership that is widely held by villagers in Indonesia. Studies have neglected this land right, as most attention has been on customary rights (Adat). Our main questions are: How do palm oil companies treat the SKT in their efforts to obtain more land for their plantations, and how do farmers try to fight for their SKT rights? Using a qualitative case study in Indonesia<acute accent>s Riau Province, we show that because of a shared perception that SKTs offer security, villagers did not attempt to get a full legal land certificate from the Land Agency, and palm oil companies often manipulated SKT land rights to acquire land for new plantations. Limited access to conflict resolution mechanisms hampers landholders' efforts to enforce their land rights, and our study suggests that the security of SKT land rights depends upon landholders' ability to fight for their rights. NGOs did not help empower them in this matter in most cases.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [61] A theory of access
    Ribot, JC
    Peluso, NL
    [J]. RURAL SOCIOLOGY, 2003, 68 (02) : 153 - 181
  • [62] Robinson B.E., 2022, Land tenure security and sustainable development, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-81881-47, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-81881-47]
  • [63] RSPO, 2015, As an organisation certification
  • [64] Reconciling community land and state forest claims in Indonesia: A case study of the Land Tenure Settlement Reconciliation Program in South Sumatra
    Salim, M. Nazir
    Wulan, Diah Retno
    Pinuji, Sukmo
    [J]. FOREST AND SOCIETY, 2021, 5 (01) : 1 - 22
  • [65] Measuring Access to Justice: Transformation and Technicality in SDG 16.3
    Satterthwaite, Margaret L.
    Dhital, Sukti
    [J]. GLOBAL POLICY, 2019, 10 : 96 - 109
  • [66] Public and Private Governance in Interaction: Changing Interpretations of Sovereignty in the Field of Sustainable Palm Oil
    Schouten, Greetje
    Hospes, Otto
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (12)
  • [67] Sjaastad E., 2000, DEV POLICY REV, V18, P365, DOI [DOI 10.1111/1467-7679.00117, 10.1111/1467-7679.00117]
  • [68] Suharto Rosediana., 2015, Joint Study on the Similarities and Differences of the ISPO and the RSPO Certification Systems
  • [69] Sunderlin W.D., 2022, Land tenure security and sustainable development, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-81881-42, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-81881-42]
  • [70] Triantoni Y., Problematika penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan: Studi kasus di Muara Teweh nomor:21/Pdt. G/2016/PN Mtw