Factors that influence the results of indirect decompression employing oblique lumbar interbody fusion

被引:1
作者
Bokov, Andrey E. [1 ]
Kalinina, Svetlana Y. [1 ]
Khaltyrov, Mingiyan, I [2 ]
Saifullin, Alexandr P. [2 ]
Bulkin, Anatoliy A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Privolzhsky Res Med Univ, Inst Traumatol & Orthoped, Dept Neurosurg, Verkhnevolzhskaya Naberezhnaya 18, Nizhnii Novgorod 603005, Russia
[2] Privolzhsky Res Med Univ, Dept Traumatol Orthoped & Neurosurg, Nizhnii Novgorod 603005, Russia
来源
WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS | 2024年 / 15卷 / 08期
关键词
Indirect decompression; Anterior reconstruction; Central lumbar spinal stenosis; Degenerative spondylolisthesis; Lateral recess stenosis; Spinal instability; Oblique lateral interbody fusion; BACK SURGERY SYNDROME; DEGENERATIVE DISEASE; NEURAL DECOMPRESSION; GUIDELINE UPDATE; STENOSIS; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; PERFORMANCE; MR;
D O I
10.5312/wjo.v15.i8.734
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND Indirect decompression is one of the potential benefits of anterior reconstruction in patients with spinal stenosis. On the other hand, the reported rate of revision surgery after indirect decompression highlights the necessity of working out prediction models for the radiographic results of indirect decompression with assessing their clinical relevance. AIM To assess factors that influence radiographic and clinical results of the indirect decompression in patients with stenosis of the lumbar spine. METHODS This study is a single-center cross-sectional evaluation of 80 consecutive patients (17 males and 63 females) with lumbar spinal stenosis combined with the instability of the lumbar spinal segment. Patients underwent single level or bisegmental spinal instrumentation employing oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. Radiographic results of the indirect decompression were assessed using computerized tomography, while MacNab scale was used to assess clinical results. RESULTS After indirect decompression employing anterior reconstruction using OLIF, the statistically significant increase in the disc space height, vertebral canal square, right and left lateral canal depth were detected (& Rcy; < 0.0001). The median (M) relative vertebral canal square increase came to & Mcy; = 24.5% with 25%-75% quartile border (16.3%; 33.3%) if indirect decompression was achieved by restoration of the segment height. In patients with the reduction of the upper vertebrae slip, the median of the relative increase in vertebral canal square accounted for 49.5% with 25%-75% quartile border (2.35; 99.75). Six out of 80 patients (7.5%) presented with unsatisfactory results because of residual nerve root compression. The critical values for lateral recess depth and vertebral canal square that were associated with indirect decompression failure were 3 mm and 80 mm2 respectively. CONCLUSION Indirect decompression employing anterior reconstruction is achieved by the increase in disc height along the posterior boarder and reduction of the slipped vertebrae in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Vertebral canal square below 80 mm2 and lateral recess depth less than 3 mm are associated with indirect decompression failures that require direct microsurgical decompression.
引用
收藏
页码:734 / 743
页数:11
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [21] Kim Shin Jae, 2014, Korean J Spine, V11, P145, DOI 10.14245/kjs.2014.11.3.145
  • [22] Indirect Decompression Failure After Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion-Reported Failures and Predictive Factors: Systematic Review
    Kirnaz, Sertac
    Navarro-Ramirez, Rodrigo
    Gu, Jiaao
    Wipplinger, Christoph
    Hussain, Ibrahim
    Adjei, Joshua
    Kim, Eliana
    Schmidt, Franziska Anna
    Wong, Taylor
    Hernandez, Robert Nick
    Hartl, Roger
    [J]. GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 10 : 8S - 16S
  • [23] Analysis of stress distribution in lumbar interbody fusion
    Kumar, N
    Judith, MR
    Kumar, A
    Mishra, V
    Robert, MC
    [J]. SPINE, 2005, 30 (15) : 1731 - 1735
  • [24] Potential and Limitations of Neural Decompression in Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion - A Systematic Review
    Lang, Gernot
    Perrech, Moritz
    Navarro-Ramirez, Rodrigo
    Hussain, Ibrahim
    Pennicooke, Brenton
    Maryam, Farah
    Avila, Mauricio J.
    Hartl, Roger
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 101 : 99 - 113
  • [25] Lumbar intervertebral instability: A review
    Leone, Antonio
    Guglielmi, Giuseppe
    Cassar-Pullicino, Victor N.
    Bonomo, Lorenzo
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2007, 245 (01) : 62 - 77
  • [26] Radiographic and clinical outcome of lateral lumbar interbody fusion for extreme lumbar spinal stenosis of Schizas grade D: a retrospective study
    Li, Jun
    Li, Hao
    Zhang, Ning
    Wang, Zhi-wei
    Zhao, Teng-fei
    Chen, Lin-wei
    Chen, Gang
    Chen, Qi-xin
    Li, Fang-cai
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [27] Dynamic Posture-Related Preoperative Pain as a Single Clinical Criterion in Patient Selection for Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion Without Direct Decompression
    Lim, Kai-Zheong
    Daly, Christopher
    Brown, Jessica
    Goldschlager, Tony
    [J]. GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 9 (06) : 575 - 582
  • [28] Management of lumbar spinal stenosis
    Lurie, Jon
    Tomkins-Lane, Christy
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 352
  • [29] Decreasing thickness and remodeling of ligamentum flavum after oblique lumbar interbody fusion (vol 56, pg 631, 2020)
    Mahatthanatrakul, Akaworn
    Kim, Hyeun Sung
    Lin, Guang-Xun
    Kim, Jin-Sung
    [J]. NEURORADIOLOGY, 2020, 62 (09) : 1203 - 1203
  • [30] Clinical results and limitations of indirect decompression in spinal stenosis with laterally implanted interbody cages: results from a prospective cohort study
    Malham, Gregory M.
    Parker, Rhiannon M.
    Goss, Ben
    Blecher, Carl M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 24 : S339 - S345