Factors that influence the results of indirect decompression employing oblique lumbar interbody fusion

被引:1
作者
Bokov, Andrey E. [1 ]
Kalinina, Svetlana Y. [1 ]
Khaltyrov, Mingiyan, I [2 ]
Saifullin, Alexandr P. [2 ]
Bulkin, Anatoliy A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Privolzhsky Res Med Univ, Inst Traumatol & Orthoped, Dept Neurosurg, Verkhnevolzhskaya Naberezhnaya 18, Nizhnii Novgorod 603005, Russia
[2] Privolzhsky Res Med Univ, Dept Traumatol Orthoped & Neurosurg, Nizhnii Novgorod 603005, Russia
来源
WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS | 2024年 / 15卷 / 08期
关键词
Indirect decompression; Anterior reconstruction; Central lumbar spinal stenosis; Degenerative spondylolisthesis; Lateral recess stenosis; Spinal instability; Oblique lateral interbody fusion; BACK SURGERY SYNDROME; DEGENERATIVE DISEASE; NEURAL DECOMPRESSION; GUIDELINE UPDATE; STENOSIS; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; PERFORMANCE; MR;
D O I
10.5312/wjo.v15.i8.734
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND Indirect decompression is one of the potential benefits of anterior reconstruction in patients with spinal stenosis. On the other hand, the reported rate of revision surgery after indirect decompression highlights the necessity of working out prediction models for the radiographic results of indirect decompression with assessing their clinical relevance. AIM To assess factors that influence radiographic and clinical results of the indirect decompression in patients with stenosis of the lumbar spine. METHODS This study is a single-center cross-sectional evaluation of 80 consecutive patients (17 males and 63 females) with lumbar spinal stenosis combined with the instability of the lumbar spinal segment. Patients underwent single level or bisegmental spinal instrumentation employing oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. Radiographic results of the indirect decompression were assessed using computerized tomography, while MacNab scale was used to assess clinical results. RESULTS After indirect decompression employing anterior reconstruction using OLIF, the statistically significant increase in the disc space height, vertebral canal square, right and left lateral canal depth were detected (& Rcy; < 0.0001). The median (M) relative vertebral canal square increase came to & Mcy; = 24.5% with 25%-75% quartile border (16.3%; 33.3%) if indirect decompression was achieved by restoration of the segment height. In patients with the reduction of the upper vertebrae slip, the median of the relative increase in vertebral canal square accounted for 49.5% with 25%-75% quartile border (2.35; 99.75). Six out of 80 patients (7.5%) presented with unsatisfactory results because of residual nerve root compression. The critical values for lateral recess depth and vertebral canal square that were associated with indirect decompression failure were 3 mm and 80 mm2 respectively. CONCLUSION Indirect decompression employing anterior reconstruction is achieved by the increase in disc height along the posterior boarder and reduction of the slipped vertebrae in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Vertebral canal square below 80 mm2 and lateral recess depth less than 3 mm are associated with indirect decompression failures that require direct microsurgical decompression.
引用
收藏
页码:734 / 743
页数:11
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Reduction of spondylolisthesis and restoration of lumbar lordosis after anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF)
    Aspalter, Stefan
    Stefanits, Harald
    Maier, Christoph Johannes
    Radl, Christian
    Wagner, Helga
    Hermann, Philipp
    Aichholzer, Martin
    Stroh, Nico
    Gruber, Andreas
    Senker, Wolfgang
    [J]. BMC SURGERY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [2] Failed back surgery syndrome: current perspectives
    Baber, Zafeer
    Erdek, Michael A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2016, 9 : 979 - 987
  • [3] Bagley Carlos, 2019, F1000Res, V8, DOI 10.12688/f1000research.16082.1
  • [4] Bokov A, 2011, PAIN PHYSICIAN, V14, P545
  • [5] A biomechanical comparison of polymethylmethacrylate-reinforced and expansive pedicle screws in pedicle-screw revisions
    Bostan, Bora
    Esenkaya, Irfan
    Gunes, Taner
    Erdem, Mehmet
    Asci, Murat
    Kelestemur, M. Halidun
    Sen, Cengiz
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2009, 43 (03) : 272 - 276
  • [6] Biomechanical Analysis and Review of Lateral Lumbar Fusion Constructs
    Cappuccino, Andrew
    Cornwall, G. Bryan
    Turner, Alexander W. L.
    Fogel, Guy R.
    Duong, Huy T.
    Kim, Kee D.
    Brodke, Darrel S.
    [J]. SPINE, 2010, 35 (26) : S361 - S367
  • [7] Indirect Decompression of Lumbar Stenosis With Transpsoas Interbody Cages and Percutaneous Posterior Instrumentation
    Castellvi, Antonio E.
    Nienke, Thomas W.
    Marulanda, German A.
    Murtagh, Ryan D.
    Santoni, Brandon G.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 472 (06) : 1784 - 1791
  • [8] Adequate cage placement for a satisfactory outcome after lumbar lateral interbody fusion with MRI and CT analysis
    Ebata, Shigeto
    Ohba, Tetsuro
    Haro, Hirotaka
    [J]. SPINE SURGERY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2018, 2 (01):
  • [9] Evaluation of Indirect Decompression of the Lumbar Spinal Canal Following Minimally Invasive Lateral Transpsoas Interbody Fusion: Radiographic and Outcome Analysis
    Elowitz, E. H.
    Yanni, D. S.
    Chwajol, M.
    Starke, R. M.
    Perin, N. I.
    [J]. MINIMALLY INVASIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2011, 54 (5-6) : 201 - 206
  • [10] A comparison of the influence of three different lumbar interbody fusion approaches on stress in the pedicle screw fixation system: Finite element static and vibration analyses
    Fan, Wei
    Guo, Li-Xin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 35 (03)