How Does the Innovation Openness of China's Sci-Tech Innovation Enterprises Support Innovation Quality: The Mediation Role of Structural Embeddedness

被引:0
作者
Song, Haoyang [1 ]
Chen, Ruixu [1 ]
Yang, Xiucai [1 ]
Hou, Jianhua [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Informat Management, Guangzhou 510275, Peoples R China
关键词
sci-tech innovation enterprise; innovation openness; innovation quality; structural embeddedness; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; EXTERNAL KNOWLEDGE SEARCH; MODERATING ROLE; NETWORK EMBEDDEDNESS; FIRM PERFORMANCE; EXPLORATORY INNOVATIONS; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; SERVICE INNOVATION; IMPACT; BREADTH;
D O I
10.3390/math12193034
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Sci-Tech innovation enterprises (STIEs) in China are responsible for improving the quality of national innovation (IQ). Because of their inherent innovation openness (IO), STIEs are facing constantly changing external cooperation channels and gradually optimizing their openness. However, existing research considers external cooperation relationships as established network environments, which may not apply to STIEs' network relationships that are still under construction. Hence, this study investigates the impact of STIEs' IO on IQ by exploring the role of structure embeddedness (SE). Empirical findings from 362 sample enterprises suggest that openness breadth and depth have an inverted U-shaped relationship with IQ, while openness balance impacts IQ positively. Moreover, network centrality plays a partial mediation role between openness depth and IQ, and network reach fully mediates the relationship between openness balance and IQ. The results indicate the influence of three openness factors on IQ and further expand the research on the SE of STIEs in the dynamic development stage. These can support STIEs to improve IQ through the adjustment of network centrality and reach by changing their openness depth and balance.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]   A dual knowledge perspective on the determinants of SME patenting Results of an empirical investigation [J].
Agostini, Lara ;
Nosella, Anna .
MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2017, 55 (06) :1226-1247
[2]   Moving Beyond Schumpeter: Management Research on the Determinants of Technological Innovation [J].
Ahuja, Gautam ;
Lampert, Curba Morris ;
Tandon, Vivek .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2008, 2 :1-98
[3]   Organizational Learning: From Experience to Knowledge [J].
Argote, Linda ;
Miron-Spektor, Ella .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2011, 22 (05) :1123-1137
[4]   The antecedents and innovation effects of domestic and offshore R&D outsourcing: The contingent impact of cognitive distance and absorptive capacity [J].
Bertrand, Olivier ;
Mol, Michael J. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (06) :751-760
[5]   Trade Induced Technical Change? The Impact of Chinese Imports on Innovation, IT and Productivity [J].
Bloom, Nicholas ;
Draca, Mirko ;
Van Reenen, John .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2016, 83 (01) :87-117
[6]  
Burton Paul, 2010, Informing Science, V13, P121
[7]   External knowledge search paths in open innovation processes of small and medium enterprises [J].
Chaochotechuang, Preecha ;
Daneshgar, Farhad ;
Mariano, Stefania .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2020, 23 (03) :524-550
[8]   The influence of scope, depth, and orientation of external technology sources on the innovative performance of Chinese firms [J].
Chen, Jin ;
Chen, Yufen ;
Vanhaverbeke, Wim .
TECHNOVATION, 2011, 31 (08) :362-373
[9]   Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries [J].
Chesbrough, H ;
Crowther, AK .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 2006, 36 (03) :229-236
[10]   Open Innovation Where We've Been and Where We're Going [J].
Chesbrough, Henry .
RESEARCH-TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2012, 55 (04) :20-27