How health literacy is taught and evaluated in dentistry, medicine, nursing, law, pharmacy, public health, and social work: a narrative review

被引:2
作者
Maybury, Catherine [1 ]
Williams, Mary Ann [2 ]
Challenger, Kelsie [3 ]
Fassas, Elisabeth [4 ]
Galvan, Sonia [5 ]
Gelmann, Dominique [4 ]
Jung, Karen S. [6 ]
Lu, Alice Yanhong [7 ]
Wang, Jocelyn [8 ,10 ]
Stines, Elsie [9 ]
Baur, Cynthia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Univ Maryland, Horowitz Ctr Hlth Literacy, Sch Publ Hlth, College Pk, MD USA
[2] Univ Maryland Baltimore, Hlth Sci & Human Serv Lib, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Univ Maryland Baltimore, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Univ Maryland Baltimore, Sch Nursing, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] Univ Maryland Baltimore, Sch Dent, Baltimore, MD USA
[7] Univ Maryland Baltimore, Sch Pharm, Baltimore, MD USA
[8] Univ Maryland, Francis King Kerry Sch Law, Baltimore, MD USA
[9] Univ Maryland, Med Ctr, Baltimore, MD USA
[10] Univ Maryland, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
Academic training; clinical skills; communication; health literacy; interprofessional education; provider communication skills training; health communication training; health literacy narrative review; INTERPROFESSIONAL EDUCATION; STUDENTS; COMMUNICATION; CURRICULUM; MODEL; CARE; TRANSITIONS; ASSIGNMENT; KNOWLEDGE; AWARENESS;
D O I
10.1080/17538068.2023.2258315
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Background:This narrative review examined the published peer-reviewed literature on how health literacy is taught and evaluated in seven health professional and adjacent disciplines: dentistry, medicine, nursing, law, pharmacy, public health, and social work. The study objectives were to assess how students are educated about health literacy and how their health literacy education and skills are evaluated.Methods:Study selection followed guidelines outlined in PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). We searched PubMed, CINAHL, SocINDEX (EBSCOhost), Lexis Advance and Public Health (ProQuest) for English-language publications of health literacy education studies across seven disciplines at U.S.-based institutions. Inclusion criteria included: 1) methods describing a primary health literacy educational intervention, 2) professional education in one or more of the seven disciplines, 3) educational institutions in the United States, and 4) articles published in peer-reviewed journals between 2000 and 2020.Results:The searches yielded 44 articles. Health literacy education is evident in six of the seven studied disciplines, and varies widely in the quality, quantity, timing and mode of education and evaluation. Despite the presence of health literacy accreditation requirements, none of the seven disciplines has developed and implemented a standard, rigorous health literacy education program for students.Conclusions:Graduating institutions and professional accreditation organizations that set the standards for education must lead the way by implementing upstream changes in health literacy professional education. Teaching health literacy to students in health professions is one strategy to help close gaps in patient/client professional communication for graduates and those they serve.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 67
页数:17
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2003, Communicating health: Priorities and strategies for progress
  • [2] Action plans to achieve the health communication objectives in Healthy People 2010
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2021, Accreditation standards for dental education programs
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2016, ACCREDITATION CRITER
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2021, Common program requirements (Residency)
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2021, Health literacy in Healthy People 2030
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2016, INTERPROFESSIONAL ED
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2015, Education Policy and Accreditation Standards
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2004, HLTH LITERACY PRESCR
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2015, Accreditation Standards and Key Elements for the Professional Program in Pharmacy Leading to the Doctor of Pharmacy Degree