What do firms gain from patenting? The case of the global ICT industry

被引:1
作者
Exadaktylos, Dimitrios [1 ]
Ghodsi, Mahdi [2 ,3 ]
Rungi, Armando [1 ]
机构
[1] AXES Lab Anal Complex Econ Syst, Piazza San Francesco 19, I-55100 Lucca, Italy
[2] Vienna Univ Econ & Business WU, Rahlgasse 3, A-1060 Vienna, Austria
[3] Vienna Inst Int Econ Studies wiiw, Rahlgasse 3, A-1060 Vienna, Austria
关键词
Intellectual property rights; ICT; Market competition; SME; PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION; INNOVATION; MARKET; STANDARDS; OPPORTUNITIES; TECHNOLOGIES; THICKETS; PARADOX; IMPACT; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123741
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study investigates the causal relationship between patent grants and firms' dynamics in the global Information and Communication Technology (ICT) industry, as the latter is a peculiar sector of modern economies, often under the lens of antitrust authorities. We exploit matched financial accounts and patent grants in 2009-2017 by 179,660 companies in 39 countries. Preliminarily, we find that less than 2% of larger firms are responsible for 89% of the grants. We propose a quasi-experimental strategy that first controls for reverse causality and then separates the impact of IPR protection from the innovative content of inventions making use of exogenous variation at the patent offices. We find that patents have a considerable impact on market shares and the size of smaller companies (31.7% and 30.7%, respectively) in the first year after the grants, which is mainly due to IPR protection. Most of the bigger firms' gains fade away after controlling for reverse causality and endogeneity. Notably, we never observe a direct impact on profitability for any firm size category. Eventually, we argue that IPR reform proposals should consider firms' heterogeneity and improve IPR access for smaller companies to enhance competition.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 80 条
[31]  
Davies R.B., 2020, CESifo Working Paper No. 8375
[32]   Organizing the global value chain: A firm-level test [J].
Del Prete, Davide ;
Rungi, Armando .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 109 :16-30
[33]   How much should society fuel the greed of innovators? On the relations between appropriability, opportunities and rates of innovation [J].
Dosi, G. ;
Marengo, L. ;
Pasquali, C. .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2006, 35 (08) :1110-1121
[34]   Reverse international knowledge transfer in the MNE: (Where) does affiliate performance boost parent performance? [J].
Driffield, Nigel ;
Love, James H. ;
Yang, Yong .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (02) :491-506
[35]   What can explain the Chinese patent explosion? [J].
Eberhardt, Markus ;
Helmers, Christian ;
Yu, Zhihong .
OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES, 2017, 69 (01) :239-262
[36]  
EUIPO, 2022, Technical Report
[37]  
Exadaktylos D., 2024, Int. Econ., V177
[38]   Cohesion Policy Meets Heterogeneous Firms [J].
Fattorini, Loredana ;
Ghodsi, Mahdi ;
Rungi, Armando .
JCMS-JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 2020, 58 (04) :803-817
[39]   Patent thickets, courts, and the market for innovation [J].
Galasso, Alberto ;
Schankerman, Mark .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2010, 41 (03) :472-503
[40]   The market for patents in Europe [J].
Gambardella, Alfonso ;
Giuri, Paola ;
Luzzi, Alessandra .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2007, 36 (08) :1163-1183