Advancing justice in flood risk management: Leveling political capabilities

被引:0
作者
Brackel, Lieke [1 ]
Pesch, Udo [1 ]
Doorn, Neelke [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management, Dept Values Technol & Innovat, POB 5015, NL-2600 GA Delft, Netherlands
来源
JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT | 2025年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词
capability approach; climate adaptation; flood risk management; justice; lobbying; political inequalities; CLIMATE-CHANGE; WATER GOVERNANCE; ADAPTATION; POWER; FRAMEWORK; POLICY; SEA; INFRASTRUCTURES; RESPONSIBILITY; PARTICIPATION;
D O I
10.1111/jfr3.13019
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Land use change, managed retreat, and relocation programs are examples of exposure reduction measures in flood risk management (FRM). Exposure reduction measures are especially prone to conflict at the local level due to competing interests, values, and attachments. In this paper, we build upon the capability approach to justice and specifically the concept of political capabilities to advance justice in exposure reduction measures in FRM. A capabilities-based approach to justice helps to recognize the multiplicity of valuable ways of life and addresses a wide range of inequalities including concerns related to recognition justice. The innovation of our capabilities-based approach to justice is that we include both actors who have too little political influence as well as those who have too much and can thus excessively steer FRM in their advantage. A political capabilities analysis is different than a focus on principles or rights because it draws attention to realized political influence and includes the informal stages of FRM politics such as lobbying. The political capabilities concept also shifts the focus from vulnerability to human agency, thereby addressing concerns in the FRM literature about the loss of self-determination and misrecognition. The paper concludes with a critical discussion of the opportunities and limitations of using the political capabilities concept in FRM.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 113 条
[1]   Why populations persist: mobility, place attachment and climate change [J].
Adams, Helen .
POPULATION AND ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 37 (04) :429-448
[2]  
Adger W.N., 2006, Fairness in adaptation to climate change, P1, DOI [10.7551/mitpress/2957.001.0001, DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/2957.001.0001]
[3]   Are managed retreat programs successful and just? A global mapping of success typologies, justice dimensions, and trade-offs [J].
Ajibade, Idowu ;
Sullivan, Meghan ;
Lower, Chris ;
Yarina, Lizzie ;
Reilly, Allie .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2022, 76
[4]   The Resilience Fix to Climate Disasters: Recursive and Contested Relations with Equity and Justice-Based Transformations in the Global South [J].
Ajibade, Idowu .
ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GEOGRAPHERS, 2022, 112 (08) :2230-2247
[5]   Why climate migration is not managed retreat: Six justifications [J].
Ajibade, Idowu ;
Sullivan, Meghan ;
Haeffner, Melissa .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2020, 65
[6]  
ALEMANNO Alberto., 2017, Lobbying for Change: Find Your Voice to Create a Better Society
[7]   A framework for evaluating flood risk governance [J].
Alexander, Meghan ;
Priest, Sally ;
Mees, Hannelore .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2016, 64 :38-47
[8]  
Alkire S., 2008, CAPABILITY APPROACH, P26, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511492587.002, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511492587.002]
[9]  
Anderson Joel., 2005, AUTONOMY CHALLENGES, P127
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2003, North, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1095-8649.2009.02189.X