What can laboratory studies tell us about potential effects of pesticides on nontarget arthropods populations and communities in the field?

被引:0
作者
Thompson, Helen [1 ]
Elston, Charlotte [1 ]
机构
[1] Syngenta, Jealotts Hill Int Res Stn, Bracknell Berks, England
关键词
Honeybee; Nontarget arthropods; Pesticides; Population/community; PLANT-PROTECTION PRODUCTS; TYPHLODROMUS-PYRI; RISK; TERRESTRIAL;
D O I
10.1002/ieam.4987
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Over the past decades, concern has been increasing over reported declines in aboveground biodiversity on farmland. In many regions, data on the toxicity of pesticides to honeybees (Apis mellifera), but not wider nontarget arthropod (NTA) data, are required for pesticide registration. In Europe, the effects of pesticides on NTAs and honeybees have been the subject of regulatory risk assessment for more than 30 years, resulting in a large database. Although insecticides may be expected to affect NTA populations, solely identifying insecticidal modes of action for further NTA testing would result in redundancy among low-risk testing products and may also exclude other modes of action with potential effects in the field. This study assessed whether the honeybee acute risk assessment could provide any indication of the potential impact and recovery time of NTAs in cropped areas at the field scale and, if so, how it might be used in a tiered testing approach. The hazard quotients (HQs; foliar application rate/LR50) were derived for 151 active substances (32% insecticides, 28% fungicides, 38% herbicides, 2% plant growth regulators) for which toxicity data for established EU Tier 1 NTA indicator species (Typhlodromus pyri, Aphidius rhopalosiphi) and application rate data were available. These HQs were compared with published NTA HQ thresholds indicating the time to recovery of NTA populations and communities in field studies (>1 to >12 months). Using the same application rate data, honeybee acute risk quotient (RQ) and HQ were also determined and compared with NTA HQs and honeybee regulatory thresholds. These comparisons demonstrated that, where required, the current regulatory honeybee acute RQ of 0.4 or honeybee HQ of 50 can provide an efficient screening tier to target NTA testing at those products and uses with potential effects in the field where recovery may exceed 12 months. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2024;00:1-8. (c) 2024 SETAC
引用
收藏
页码:2326 / 2333
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Scientific Opinion addressing the state of the science on risk assessment of plant protection products for non-target arthropods
    Aagaard, Alf
    Brock, Theo
    Capri, Ettore
    Duquesne, Sabine
    Filipic, Metka
    Hernandez-Jerez, Antonio F.
    Hirsch-Ernst, Karen I.
    Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard
    Klein, Michael
    Kuhl, Thomas
    Laskowski, Ryszard
    Liess, Matthias
    Mantovani, Alberto
    Ockleford, Colin
    Ossendorp, Bernadette
    Pickford, Daniel
    Smith, Robert
    Sousa, Paulo
    Sundh, Ingvar
    Tiktak, Aaldrik
    Van Der Linden, Ton
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2015, 13 (02)
  • [2] Revised guidance on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (Apis mellifera, Bombus spp. and solitary bees)
    Adriaanse, Pauline
    Arce, Andres
    Focks, Andreas
    Ingels, Brecht
    Joelli, Daniela
    Lambin, Sebastien
    Rundloef, Maj
    Suessenbach, Dirk
    Del Aguila, Monica
    Ercolano, Valeria
    Ferilli, Franco
    Ippolito, Alessio
    Szentes, Csaba
    Neri, Franco Maria
    Padovani, Laura
    Rortais, Agnes
    Wassenberg, Jacoba
    Auteri, Domenica
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2023, 21 (05)
  • [3] Anonymous, 2010, Bulletin OEPP, V40, P323, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2338.2010.02419.x
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2014, Guidance for assessing pesticide risk to bees
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2009, Official Journal of the European Union
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2016, Memorandum for Capturing and Execution Reporting of Individual Flight Test Costs
  • [7] Calibration of laboratory derived indices for non-target arthropod risk assessment with field data for plant protection products
    Bakker, Frank
    Aldershof, Saskia
    Braaker, Sonja
    Dinter, Axel
    Elston, Charlotte
    Kroder, Stefan
    Mayer, Christoph-Julian
    Pilling, Ed
    Neumann, Paul
    [J]. ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2022, 235
  • [8] Barrett K.L., 1994, Guidance Document on Regulatory Testing Procedures for Pesticides with Non-Target Arthropods
  • [9] Blumel S., 2000, Guidelines to evaluate side-effects of plant protection products to non-target arthropods, P121
  • [10] Campbell PJ, 2000, ANZ SCHADL-J PEST SC, V73, P117