Impacts of the 4.5 and 8.5 RCP global climate scenarios on nearly zero energy building performance: Sensitivity analysis about operative conditions of insulation materials and PV system degradation

被引:0
作者
De Masi, Rosa Francesca [1 ]
Gigante, Antonio [1 ]
Ruggiero, Silvia [1 ]
Russo, Alessandro [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sannio, Dept Engn, DING, I-82100 Benevento, Italy
关键词
THERMAL-CONDUCTIVITY; PHOTOVOLTAIC MODULES; WEATHER DATA; SIMULATION; PARAMETERS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1080/23744731.2024.2394359
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The paper gives a directive toward assessment of resilience of building designed to comply the nearly zero energy standard in the current conditions and also points out the gap in the existing approach for evaluating the effect that the climate changes could have on building material behavior and systems degradation. A method is introduced for evaluating how the variation of energy need and in-situ production can modify the energy balance under the representative concentration pathway of the intermediate (RCP 4.5) and the worst emissions scenario (RCP 8.5). The results for a case study indicate that under RCP 4.5 scenario, the polyethylene foam insulation has the higher increment of heating demand (+ 9.8%) instead the cooling demand decreases by -4.2% (RCP 8.5) and -4.6% (RCP 4.5). The innovative materials are less affected (<1%) by temperature variations. On the other hand, the PV system degradation causes the reduction of in-situ production from -6.9% (RCP 8.5) and -8.0% (RCP 4.5). However, the analysis of the hourly balance suggests that the building resilience would be not compromised. Indeed, by evaluating the ratio between the self-consumption and the total request, it increases compared to the current conditions of around 2%.
引用
收藏
页码:1236 / 1255
页数:20
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] Investigation into the impacts of design, installation, operation and maintenance issues on performance and degradation of installed solar photovoltaic (PV) systems
    Aboagye, Bernard
    Gyamfi, Samuel
    Ofosu, Eric Antwi
    Djordjevic, Sinisa
    [J]. ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 66 : 165 - 176
  • [2] Aiyin Jiang, 2018, International Journal of Construction Education and Research, V14, P22, DOI 10.1080/15578771.2017.1280104
  • [3] Thermal resilience in a renovated nearly zero-energy dwelling during intense heat waves
    Amaripadath, Deepak
    Joshi, Mitali Yeshwant
    Hamdy, Mohamed
    Petersen, Steffen
    Stone Jr, Brian
    Attia, Shady
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUILDING PERFORMANCE SIMULATION, 2023,
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2023, EPENERGYPLUS WEATHER
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2016, 103493 UNI
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2023, PD PRESIDENTIAL DECR
  • [7] Design of the first net-zero energy buildings in Estonia
    Arumaegi, Endrik
    Kalamees, Targo
    [J]. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 22 (07) : 1039 - 1049
  • [8] Ascione F., 2019, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, V609, DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/609/7/072038
  • [9] Resilience to the climate change of nearly zero energy-building designed according to the EPBD recast: Monitoring, calibrated energy models and perspective simulations of a Mediterranean nZEB living lab
    Ascione, Fabrizio
    De Masi, Rosa Francesca
    Gigante, Antonio
    Vanoli, Giuseppe Peter
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2022, 262
  • [10] Concept, Design and Energy Performance of a Net Zero-Energy Building in Mediterranean Climate
    Ascione, Fabrizio
    Bianco, Nicola
    de Rossi, Filippo
    De Masi, Rosa Francesca
    Vanoli, Giuseppe Peter
    [J]. FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COUNTERMEASURES TO URBAN HEAT ISLAND, (UHI 2016), 2016, 169 : 26 - 37