Movement bias in asymmetric landscapes and its impact on population distribution and critical habitat size

被引:2
|
作者
Dornelas, Vivian [1 ,2 ]
de Castro, Pablo [1 ]
Calabrese, Justin M. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Fagan, William F. [5 ]
Martinez-Garcia, Ricardo [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Paulista UNESP, ICTP South Amer Inst Fundamental Res, Inst Fis Teor, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] NICPB, Akad Tee 23, EE-12618 Tallinn, Estonia
[3] Helmholtz Zentrum Dresden Rosendorf HZDR, Ctr Adv Syst Understanding CASUS, Gorlitz, Germany
[4] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Ecol Modelling, Leipzig, Germany
[5] Univ Maryland, Dept Biol, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES | 2024年 / 480卷 / 2297期
关键词
population spatial distribution; critical patch size; heterogeneous landscapes; space-dependent movement; ecological trap; DENSITY-DEPENDENT DISPERSAL; CRITICAL PATCH SIZE; ECOLOGICAL TRAPS; SPECIES LOSS; HOME RANGES; PERSISTENCE; DYNAMICS; DIFFUSION; MODELS; EDGES;
D O I
10.1098/rspa.2024.0185
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Ecologists have long investigated how demographic and movement parameters determine the spatial distribution and critical habitat size of a population. However, most models oversimplify movement behaviour, neglecting how landscape heterogeneity influences individual movement. We relax this assumption and introduce a reaction-advection-diffusion equation that describes population dynamics when individuals exhibit space-dependent movement bias toward preferred regions. Our model incorporates two types of these preferred regions: a high-quality habitat patch, termed 'habitat', which is included to model avoidance of degraded habitats like deforested regions; and a preferred location, such as a chemoattractant source or a watering hole, that we allow to be asymmetrically located with respect to habitat edges. In this scenario, the critical habitat size depends on both the relative position of the preferred location and the movement bias intensities. When preferred locations are near habitat edges, the critical habitat size can decrease when diffusion increases, a phenomenon called the drift paradox. Also, ecological traps arise when the habitat overcrowds due to excessive attractiveness or the preferred location is near a low-quality region. Our results highlight the importance of species-specific movement behaviour and habitat preference as drivers of population dynamics in fragmented landscapes and, therefore, in the design of protected areas.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Impact of population size on early adaptation in rugged fitness landscapes
    Servajean, Richard
    Bitbol, Anne-Florence
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 378 (1877)
  • [2] Impact of population behavioural responses on the critical community size of infectious diseases
    Fair, Kathyrn R.
    Karatayev, Vadim A.
    Anand, Madhur
    Bauch, Chris T.
    THEORETICAL ECOLOGY, 2024, 17 (03) : 269 - 280
  • [3] Differential habitat selection in boreal songbirds influences estimates of population size and distribution
    Crosby, Andrew D.
    Bayne, Erin M.
    Cumming, Steven G.
    Schmiegelow, Fiona K. A.
    Denes, Francisco, V
    Tremblay, Junior A.
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2019, 25 (12) : 1941 - 1953
  • [4] Distribution, Population Size, and Habitat Characteristics of the Endangered European Ground Squirrel (Spermophilus citellus, Rodentia, Mammalia) in Its Southernmost Range
    Rammou, Dimitra-Lida
    Kavroudakis, Dimitris
    Youlatos, Dionisios
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (15)
  • [5] Impact of population size and movement on the persistence of a two-strain infectious disease
    Salako, Rachidi B.
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL BIOLOGY, 2023, 86 (01)
  • [6] The overlap of suitable tea plant habitat with Asian elephant (Elephus maximus) distribution in southwestern China and its potential impact on species conservation and local economy
    Dai, Yunchuan
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (04) : 5960 - 5970