Fish community monitoring in floodplain lakes: eDNA metabarcoding and traditional sampling revealed inconsistent fish community composition

被引:1
作者
He, Yiwei [1 ]
Zhao, Xianfu [4 ]
Shi, Chenxi [1 ]
Peng, Keyang [1 ]
Wang, Zhe [1 ]
Jiang, Zhongguan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Univ, Sch Resources & Environm Engn, Hefei 230601, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Univ, Anhui Prov Key Lab Wetland Ecosyst Protect & Resto, Hefei 230601, Peoples R China
[3] Anhui Shengjin Lake Wetland Ecol Natl Long Term Sc, Dongzhi 247230, Peoples R China
[4] Minist Water Resources & Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Hydroecol, Key Lab Ecol Impacts Hydraul Projects & Restorat A, Minist Water Resources, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Fish community; eDNA metabarcoding; Accordion-shaped trap; Multi-mesh gillnets; Floodplain lakes; Multidimensional diversity; ENVIRONMENTAL DNA; HYDROLOGICAL CONNECTIVITY; RIVER; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; DIVERSITY; DEGRADATION; TEMPERATURE; INTEGRITY; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112467
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Fish, acting as the dominant vertebrates in aquatic ecosystems, exhibit strong mobility and complex activity patterns, which make it challenging for the quantitative assessment of fish communities. Previous fieldwork has applied multiple fish sampling devices as well as eDNA technology respectively, with limited studies comparing the reliability, representativity, and applicability of eDNA metabarcoding and traditional sampling methods in investigating fish assemblages across spatiotemporal scales. In this study, we selected Lake Huang (a provincial nature reserve) to compare the eDNA technology and traditional sampling methods (multi-mesh gillnets and accordion-shaped traps) in revealing differences in species composition, a diversity, and (3 diversity of fish assemblages in both high-water phase and low-water phase. Results showed that eDNA technology detected more fish species and required fewer samples to achieve sufficient sampling compared to traditional methods. Specifically, our results demonstrated significant methodological variations in species composition, with both traditional sampling and eDNA approaches revealing the method-dependent species checklist. In the high-water phase, the eDNA approach recorded significantly lower (3 diversity ((3SOR and (3SIM) than traditional sampling methods, which may result from the more homogeneous eDNA water samples triggered by flooding, resulting in lower between-sites variations in fish communities. However, in the low-water phase, eDNA technology reported significantly higher (3 diversity ((3SOR and (3SNE) than traditional sampling methods, potentially attributed to the loss of eDNA information as well as heterogeneous eDNA samples accompanied by water receding. In addition, taking advantage of the separated and narrowed habitat in the low-water phase, fish individuals were more easily captured, resulting in a relatively higher Shannon-Wiener index recorded by traditional sampling methods. Based on inconsistency in species composition characterized by two methods, our results exhibited that eDNA technology is more efficient in detecting species, while there was an urgent need to design more sensitive primers, provide more complete reference databases, and popularize more emerging sequencing platforms for the advancement of eDNA technology. Comparing with the fish assemblage diversity identified by traditional sampling methods, our result exhibited the transport of DNA fragments may potentially enlarge the homogenized or heterogeneous fish community characterization influenced by flood pulses.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison Between Environmental DNA Metabarcoding and Traditional Survey Method to Identify Community Composition and Assembly of Stream Fish
    Liu, Ziyu
    Hu, Cong
    You, Wenhui
    Li, Shuxin
    Wu, Yongsheng
    Liang, Yangyang
    Chu, Ling
    Yan, Yunzhi
    Zhang, Chen
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2024, 14 (11):
  • [32] Determining an effective sampling method for eDNA metabarcoding: a case study for fish biodiversity monitoring in a small, natural river
    Masayuki K. Sakata
    Takeshi Watanabe
    Nobutaka Maki
    Kousuke Ikeda
    Toshihiro Kosuge
    Hiroaki Okada
    Hiroki Yamanaka
    Tetsuya Sado
    Masaki Miya
    Toshifumi Minamoto
    Limnology, 2021, 22 : 221 - 235
  • [33] A National Scale "BioBlitz" Using Citizen Science and eDNA Metabarcoding for Monitoring Coastal Marine Fish
    Agersnap, Sune
    Sigsgaard, Eva Egelyng
    Jensen, Mads Reinholdt
    Avila, Marcelo De Paula
    Carl, Henrik
    Moller, Peter Rask
    Kros, Simon Leed
    Knudsen, Steen Wilhelm
    Wisz, Mary S.
    Thomsen, Philip Francis
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2022, 9
  • [34] The Effect of Spatio-Temporal Sampling and Biological Replication on the Detection of Kelp Forest Fish Communities Using eDNA Metabarcoding
    Courtaillac, Kira-Lee
    Landschoff, Jannes
    Hull, Kelvin
    von der Heyden, Sophie
    ENVIRONMENTAL DNA, 2024, 6 (05):
  • [35] Freshwater fish community assessment using eDNA metabarcoding vs. capture-based methods: Differences in efficiency and resolution coupled to habitat and ecology
    Curto, Manuel
    Batista, Sofia
    Santos, Carlos D.
    Ribeiro, Filipe
    Nogueira, Sofia
    Ribeiro, Diogo
    Prindle, Benjamin
    Licari, Daniel
    Riccioni, Giulia
    Dias, Diogo
    Pina-Martins, Francisco
    Jentoft, Sissel
    Verissimo, Ana
    Alves, Maria Judite
    Gante, Hugo F.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2025, 274
  • [36] Environmental DNA metabarcoding reveals spatial and seasonal patterns in the fish community in the Venice Lagoon
    Cananzi, Gabriele
    Gregori, Irene
    Martino, Francesco
    Li, Tianshi
    Boscari, Elisa
    Camatti, Elisa
    Congiu, Leonardo
    Marino, Ilaria Anna Maria
    Pansera, Marco
    Schroeder, Anna
    Zane, Lorenzo
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2022, 9
  • [37] Nearshore fish diversity changes with sampling method and human disturbance: Comparing eDNA metabarcoding and seine netting along the Upper St. Lawrence River
    Maracle, Stafford Rohtehra kwas
    Tournayre, Orianne
    Windle, Matthew J. S.
    Cormier, Emily
    Schwartz, Kate
    Wylie-Arbic, Mackenzie
    Rundle, Evan
    Perron, Mary Ann
    Francis, Abraham
    Lougheed, Stephen C.
    JOURNAL OF GREAT LAKES RESEARCH, 2024, 50 (03)
  • [38] Application of eDNA metabarcoding for monitoring the fish diversity of the Jiangjin to Fuling section of the upper reaches of the Yangtze River
    Cheng, Ruli
    Luo, Yang
    Li, Qinghua
    Zhang, Yufeng
    Liu, Zhihao
    Chen, Qiliang
    Li, Yingwen
    Shen, Yanjun
    HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2023, 850 (19) : 4067 - 4088
  • [39] Monitoring estuarine fish communities: environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding as a complement to beach seining
    Saunders, Mark D.
    Steeves, Royce
    Macintyre, Leah P.
    Knysh, Kyle M.
    Coffin, Michael R. S.
    Boudreau, Monica
    Pater, Christina C.
    van den Heuvel, Michael R.
    Courtenay, Simon C.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 2024, 81 (10) : 1344 - 1357
  • [40] Is the community of fish gill parasites structured in a Neotropical floodplain?
    Sybelle Bellay
    Ricardo Massato Takemoto
    Edson Fontes Oliveira
    Acta Parasitologica, 2012, 57 : 53 - 60