Reward-modulated attention deployment is driven by suppression, not attentional capture

被引:1
|
作者
Taylor, Emily D. [1 ]
Feldmann-Wuestefeld, Tobias [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Sch Psychol, Southampton, England
[2] Tech Univ Berlin, Inst Psychol & Ergon, Marchstr 23, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Reward; Visual attention; Visual search; Attentional capture; Suppression; Pd; N2pc; TOP-DOWN; OCULOMOTOR CAPTURE; VISUAL-SEARCH; NEURAL MECHANISMS; STATISTICAL REGULARITIES; IRRELEVANT STIMULI; INCENTIVE SALIENCE; TASK-IRRELEVANT; BOTTOM-UP; CONTINGENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120831
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
One driving factor for attention deployment towards a stimulus is its associated value due to previous experience and learning history. Previous visual search studies found that when looking for a target, distractors associated with higher reward produce more interference (e.g., longer response times). The present study investigated the neural mechanism of such value-driven attention deployment. Specifically, we were interested in which of the three attention sub-processes are responsible for the interference that was repeatedly observed behaviorally: enhancement of relevant information, attentional capture by irrelevant information, or suppression of irrelevant information. We replicated earlier findings showing longer response times and lower accuracy when a target competed with a high-reward compared to a low-reward distractor. We also found a spatial gradient of interference: behavioral performance dropped with increasing proximity to the target. This gradient was steeper for high- than low-reward distractors. Event-related potentials of the EEG signal showed the reason for the reward-induced attentional bias: High-reward distractors required more suppression than low-reward distractors as evident in larger Pd components. This effect was only found for distractors near targets, showing the additional filtering needs required for competing stimuli in close proximity. As a result, fewer attentional resources can be distributed to the target when it competes with a high-reward distractor, as evident in a smaller target-N2pc amplitude. The distractor-N2pc, indicative of attentional capture, was neither affected by distance nor reward, showing that attentional capture alone cannot explain interference by stimuli of high value. In sum our results show that the higher need for suppression of high-value stimuli contributes to reward-modulated attention deployment and increased suppression can prevent attentional capture of high-value stimuli.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Contingent attentional capture or delayed allocation of attention?
    Roger W. Remington
    Charles L. Folk
    John P. Mclean
    Perception & Psychophysics, 2001, 63 : 298 - 307
  • [32] Value-modulated attentional capture in reward and punishment contexts, attentional control, and their relationship with psychopathology
    Freichel, Rene
    Mrkonja, Lana
    de Jong, Peter J.
    Cousijn, Janna
    Franken, Ingmar
    Ruiter, Tom A.
    Le Pelley, Mike
    Albertella, Lucy
    Watson, Poppy
    Veer, Ilya M.
    Wiers, Reinout W.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, 2023, 14 (04):
  • [33] On the value-dependence of value-driven attentional capture
    Anderson, Brian A.
    Halpern, Madeline
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2017, 79 (04) : 1001 - 1011
  • [34] Suppression of overt attentional capture by salient-but-irrelevant color singletons
    Nicholas Gaspelin
    Carly J. Leonard
    Steven J. Luck
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2017, 79 : 45 - 62
  • [35] Reduced attentional capture by reward following an acute dose of alcohol
    Watson, Poppy
    Pearson, Daniel
    Le Pelley, Mike E.
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 237 (12) : 3625 - 3639
  • [36] Decomposing experience-driven attention: Opposite attentional effects of previously predictive cues
    Lin, Zhicheng
    Lu, Zhong-Lin
    He, Sheng
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2016, 78 (07) : 2185 - 2198
  • [37] Memory-based attentional biases survive spatial suppression driven by selection history
    van Moorselaar, Dirk
    Theeuwes, Jan
    Olivers, Christian N. L.
    VISUAL COGNITION, 2019, 27 (3-4) : 343 - 350
  • [38] Salient-but-irrelevant stimuli cause attentional capture in difficult, but attentional suppression in easy visual search
    Barras, Caroline
    Kerzel, Dirk
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 54 (12) : 1826 - 1838
  • [39] Value-driven attentional capture in neglect
    Bourgeois, Alexia
    Saj, Arnaud
    Vuilleumier, Patrik
    CORTEX, 2018, 109 : 260 - 271
  • [40] Persistence of Value-Driven Attentional Capture
    Anderson, Brian A.
    Yantis, Steven
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2013, 39 (01) : 6 - 9