Diatoms as bioindicators for health assessments of ephemeral freshwater ecosystems: A comprehensive review

被引:2
|
作者
Taurozzi, Davide [1 ]
Cesarini, Giulia [2 ]
Scalici, Massimiliano [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma Tre, Dept Sci, Viale G Marconi 446, I-00146 Rome, Italy
[2] CNR, Water Res Inst CNR IRSA, Corso Tonolli 50, I-28922 Verbania, Italy
[3] Univ Palermo, Natl Biodivers Future Ctr NBFC, Piazza Marina 61, I-90133 Palermo, Italy
关键词
Temporary; Intermittent; Pond; Lake; Wetland; River; Conservation; TEMPORARY PONDS; ECOLOGICAL GUILDS; RIVER; RECOMMENDATIONS; ASSEMBLAGES; INDICATORS; DYNAMICS; ALTITUDE; QUALITY; STREAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112309
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Ephemeral waters (EW) are sensitive and vulnerable ecosystems that, although the numerous ecosystem services provided, are poorly investigated and properly managed. Diatoms represent an important biological model largely used in aquatic permanent habitats but underused in ephemeral waters. The aim of this review is to address the knowledge gap, examining the current state of knowledge regarding the health of EW, with a focus on diatoms as bioindicators, specially (i) presenting research trends on EW ecosystem types investigated (ii) analysing the methodological approach, (iii) providing the influence of abiotic factors on the diatom assemblages in EW. A bibliographic search yielded a total of 512 papers. After removing duplicate records, 118 were eliminated. The screening of abstracts resulted in the selection of 48 articles on diatoms and EW since 1982. To avoid discrepancy between terminology we decided to classify the EW found in 3 different categories: Intermittent Running Waters (IRW: rivers, streams, creek, springs), Temporary Large Wetlands (TLW: wetlands, lakes, lagoons) and Temporary Small Waters (TSW: ponds, pools, ventaroles, ditches, thermal waters, troughs, pans). Studies are reported in all continents including Antarctic. IRW are the most investigated ecosystem (n = 683), followed by TSW (239) and TLW (96). Furthermore, studies were mainly conducted on sites located below 1000 m a.s.l. of altitude (n = 27). Studies mainly focus on epilithic diatoms (52 %). Electrical conductivity (80 %), pH (77 %) and water temperature (75 %) are the principal physical-chemical parameters considered. Moreover, electrical conductivity, pH, temperature, nitrate and nitrite resulted the best diatom community drivers. Future research is encouraged (1) to achieve a standardised protocol for monitoring EW using diatoms, (2) to focus on conservation projects for high-altitude temporary waters, and (3) to investigate the main driving forces influencing diatom diversity on EW.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Aquatic Insects and Benthic Diatoms: A History of Biotic Relationships in Freshwater Ecosystems
    Fenoglio, Stefano
    Tierno de Figueroa, Jose Manuel
    Doretto, Alberto
    Falasco, Elisa
    Bona, Francesca
    WATER, 2020, 12 (10) : 1 - 14
  • [2] A systematic review of approaches to assess fish health responses to anthropogenic threats in freshwater ecosystems
    Mallett, Maxwell C.
    Thiem, Jason D.
    Butler, Gavin L.
    Kennard, Mark J.
    CONSERVATION PHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 12 (01):
  • [3] Terrigenous micromycetes in freshwater ecosystems (review)
    Voronin, L. V.
    INLAND WATER BIOLOGY, 2014, 7 (04) : 352 - 356
  • [4] A Global review of cumulative effects assessments of disturbances on forest ecosystems
    Antwi, Effah Kwabena
    Boakye-Danquah, John
    Owusu-Banahene, Wiafe
    Webster, Kara
    Dabros, Anna
    Wiebe, Philip
    Mayor, Stephen J.
    Westwood, Alana
    Mansuy, Nicolas
    Setiawati, Martiwi Diah
    Yohuno , Priscilla Toloo
    Bill, Kristen
    Kwaku, Adu
    Kosuta, Sonja
    Sarfo, Anthony Kwabena
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 317
  • [5] Bioindicators in marine waters: Benthic diatoms as a tool to assess water quality from eutrophic to oligotrophic coastal ecosystems
    Desrosiers, Catherine
    Leflaive, Josephine
    Eulin, Anne
    Ten-Hage, Loick
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2013, 32 : 25 - 34
  • [6] The use of fish parasites as bioindicators of heavy metals in aquatic ecosystems: A review
    Sures B.
    Aquatic Ecology, 2001, 35 (2) : 245 - 255
  • [7] Can environmental impact assessments alone conserve freshwater fish biota? Review of the Chilean experience
    Lacy, Shaw Nozaki
    Meza, Francisco J.
    Marquet, Pablo A.
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2017, 63 : 87 - 94
  • [8] Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Dimension in Freshwater Ecosystems
    Deeksha
    Shukla, Anoop Kumar
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (17):
  • [9] Comprehensive survey and health risk assessment of antibiotic residues in freshwater fish in southeast China
    Hua, Yongyou
    Yao, Qinghua
    Lin, Jian
    Li, Xi
    Yang, Yan
    JOURNAL OF FOOD COMPOSITION AND ANALYSIS, 2022, 114
  • [10] Raman spectroscopy applied to diatoms (microalgae, Bacillariophyta): Prospective use in the environmental diagnosis of freshwater ecosystems
    Pinto, Raquel
    Vilarinho, Rui
    Carvalho, Antonio Paulo
    Moreira, J. Agostinho
    Guimaraes, Laura
    Oliva-Teles, Luis
    WATER RESEARCH, 2021, 198 (198)