Evaluating the Effects of Parameter Uncertainty on River Water Quality Predictions

被引:0
|
作者
Fonseca, Andre [1 ]
Botelho, Cidalia [2 ]
Boaventura, Rui A. R. [2 ]
Vilar, Vitor J. P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tras os Montes & Alto Douro, Inst Innovat Capac Bldg & Sustainabil Agrifood Pro, Ctr Res & Technol Agroenvironm & Biol Sci CITAB, P-5001801 Vila Real, Portugal
[2] Univ Porto, Fac Engn, Dept Chem Engn, Associate Lab,LSRE,LCM,LSRE Lab Separat & React En, P-4200465 Porto, Portugal
来源
RESOURCES-BASEL | 2024年 / 13卷 / 08期
关键词
water resources; uncertainty analysis; sensitivity analysis; river water quality modeling; HSPF; MODEL; QUANTIFICATION; SENSITIVITY; CALIBRATION; MANAGEMENT; CATCHMENT; BASIN;
D O I
10.3390/resources13080106
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Due to the high uncertainty of model predictions, it is often challenging to draw definitive conclusions when evaluating river water quality in the context of management options. The major aim of this study is to present a statistical evaluation of the Hydrologic Simulation Program FORTRAN (HSPF), which is a water quality modeling system, and how this modeling system can be used as a valuable tool to enhance monitoring planning and reduce uncertainty in water quality predictions. The authors' findings regarding the sensitivity analysis of the HSPF model in relation to water quality predictions are presented. The application of the computer model was focused on the Ave River watershed in Portugal. Calibration of the hydrology was performed at two stations over five years, starting from January 1990 and ending in December 1994. Following the calibration, the hydrology model was then validated for another five-year period, from January 1995 to December 1999. A comprehensive evaluation framework is proposed, which includes a two-step statistical evaluation based on commonly used hydrology criteria for model calibration and validation. To thoroughly assess model uncertainty and parameter sensitivity, a Monte Carlo method uncertainty evaluation approach is integrated, along with multi-parametric sensitivity analyses. The Monte Carlo simulation considers the probability distributions of fourteen HSPF water quality parameters, which are used as input factors. The parameters that had the greatest impact on the simulated in-stream fecal coliform concentrations were those that represented the first-order decay rate and the surface runoff mechanism, which effectively removed 90 percent of the fecal coliform from the pervious land surface. These parameters had a more significant influence compared to the accumulation and maximum storage rates. When it comes to the oxygen governing process, the parameters that showed the highest sensitivity were benthal oxygen demand and nitrification/denitrification rate. The insights that can be derived from this study play a critical role in the development of robust water management strategies, and their significance lies in their potential to contribute to the advancement of predictive models in the field of water resources.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multiple-pattern parameter identification and uncertainty analysis approach for water quality modeling
    Zou, Rui
    Lung, Wu-Seng
    Wu, Jing
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2009, 220 (05) : 621 - 629
  • [22] Water Quality Trading Framework with Uncertainty for River Systems Due to Climate and Population Characteristics
    Su, Juhn-Yuan
    Goel, Ramesh
    Burian, Steven
    Hinners, Sarah J.
    Kochanski, Adam
    Strong, Courtenay
    Barber, Michael E.
    WATER, 2021, 13 (13)
  • [23] Evaluating the impact of land use uncertainty on the simulated streamflow and sediment yield of the Seyhan River basin using the SWAT model
    El-Sadek, Ashraf
    Irvem, Ahmet
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY, 2014, 38 (04) : 515 - 530
  • [24] Effects of Soil Hydraulic and Transport Parameter Uncertainty on Predictions of Solute Transport in Large Lysimeters
    Skaggs, T. H.
    Suarez, D. L.
    Goldberg, S.
    VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL, 2013, 12 (01):
  • [25] Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis for river quality modelling
    Radwan, M
    Willems, P
    Berlamont, J
    JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2004, 6 (02) : 83 - 99
  • [26] HSPF-based watershed-scale water quality modeling and uncertainty analysis
    Roostaee, Maryam
    Deng, Zhiqiang
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2019, 26 (09) : 8971 - 8991
  • [27] Uncertainty assessment for watershed water quality modeling: A Probabilistic Collocation Method based approach
    Zheng, Yi
    Wang, Weiming
    Han, Feng
    Ping, Jing
    ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2011, 34 (07) : 887 - 898
  • [28] Coupling model uncertainty for coupled rainfall/runoff and surface water quality models in river problems
    Parker, Geoffrey T.
    Droste, Ronald L.
    Rennie, Colin D.
    ECOHYDROLOGY, 2013, 6 (05) : 845 - 851
  • [29] Accounting for uncertainty in evaluating water quality impacts of urban development plan
    Zhou, Jiquan
    Liu, Yi
    Chen, Jining
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2010, 30 (04) : 219 - 228
  • [30] Integrated Modelling System with Uncertainty Analysis for Reservoir Water Quality Management in a Reclamation River Basin
    Ham, Jonghwa
    Hong, Yoon-Seok Timothy
    IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE, 2016, 65 : 246 - 257