Improving instrumental variable estimators with poststratification

被引:0
作者
Pashley, Nicole E. [1 ]
Keele, Luke [2 ,3 ]
Miratrix, Luke W. [4 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Stat, 501 Hill Ctr,110 Frelinghuysen Rd, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Univ Penn, Dept Biostat, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Grad Sch Educ, Cambridge, MA USA
关键词
blocking; compliance; instrumental variables; poststratification; randomization inference; voter mobilization; PRINCIPAL STRATIFICATION; VOTER TURNOUT; CAUSAL; MOBILIZATION; INFERENCE; CALLS; MAIL;
D O I
10.1093/jrsssa/qnae073
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Experiments studying get-out-the-vote (GOTV) efforts estimate causal effects of various mobilization efforts on voter turnout. However, there is often substantial noncompliance in these studies. A usual approach is to use an instrumental variable (IV) analysis to estimate impacts for compliers, here being those actually contacted by the investigators. Unfortunately, popular IV estimators can be unstable in studies with a small fraction of compliers. We explore poststratifying the data (e.g. taking a weighted average of IV estimates within each stratum) using variables that predict complier status (and, potentially, the outcome) to mitigate this. We present the benefits of poststratification in terms of bias, variance, and improved standard error estimates, and provide a finite-sample asymptotic variance formula. We also compare the performance of different IV approaches and discuss the advantages of our design-based poststratification approach over incorporating compliance-predictive covariates into the two-stage least squares (2SLS) estimator. In the end, we show that covariates predictive of compliance can increase precision, but only if one is willing to make a bias-variance trade-off by down-weighting or dropping strata with few compliers. By contrast, standard approaches such as 2SLS fail to use such information. We finally examine the benefits of our approach in two GOTV applications.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Angrist JD, 1996, J AM STAT ASSOC, V91, P444, DOI 10.2307/2291629
[2]   Get Out the Vote-by-Mail? A Randomized Field Experiment Testing the Effect of Mobilization in Traditional and Vote-by-Mail Precincts [J].
Arceneaux, Kevin ;
Kousser, Thad ;
Mullin, Megan .
POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2012, 65 (04) :882-894
[3]   Who Is Mobilized to Vote? A Re-Analysis of 11 Field Experiments [J].
Arceneaux, Kevin ;
Nickerson, David W. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 53 (01) :1-16
[4]   Near/far matching: A study design approach to instrumental variables [J].
Mike Baiocchi ;
Dylan S. Small ;
Lin Yang ;
Daniel Polsky ;
Peter W. Groeneveld .
Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2012, 12 (4) :237-253
[5]  
BEACH ML, 1989, CONTROL CLIN TRIALS, V10, pS161
[6]   Noncompliance and Instrumental Variables for 2K Factorial Experiments [J].
Blackwell, Matthew ;
Pashley, Nicole E. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2023, 118 (542) :1102-1114
[7]   ACCOUNTING FOR NO-SHOWS IN EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION DESIGNS [J].
BLOOM, HS .
EVALUATION REVIEW, 1984, 8 (02) :225-246
[8]   PROBLEMS WITH INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES ESTIMATION WHEN THE CORRELATION BETWEEN THE INSTRUMENTS AND THE ENDOGENOUS EXPLANATORY VARIABLE IS WEAK [J].
BOUND, J ;
JAEGER, DA ;
BAKER, RM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 90 (430) :443-450
[9]  
Bowers J., 2008, Harvard Dataverse, DOI [10.7910/DVN/Q6CID7, DOI 10.7910/DVN/Q6CID7]
[10]   Does digital advertising affect vote choice? Evidence from a randomized field experiment [J].
Coppock, Alexander ;
Green, Donald P. ;
Porter, Ethan .
RESEARCH & POLITICS, 2022, 9 (01)