Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy (QCAE)

被引:0
作者
Luebke, Laura [1 ]
Krogmann, Diana [1 ]
Spitzer, Carsten [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Rostock, Klin & Poliklin Psychosomat Med & Psychotherapie, Rostock, Germany
关键词
empathy; affective and cognitive empathy; assessment; self-report measure;
D O I
10.1055/a-2366-9995
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Empathy as a central element of social cognition plays a decisive role in various psychosocial areas and interpersonal dynamics, especially within the context of psychotherapy. Despite the controversy surrounding a standardized definition, empathy is generally regarded as a multidimensional concept that encompasses both cognitive and affective dimensions. This differentiation between cognitive and affective facets is addressed by a widely used and internationally well-established self-report measure of empathy, the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy (QCAE). This study focuses on evaluating the psychometric properties of the German version of the QCAE. In a convenience sample (N = 1300), the postulated confirmatory five-factor model showed an adequate fit to the underlying structure. The subscales of the QCAE exhibited satisfactory internal consistency and convergent validity with other instruments measuring empathy. Despite certain methodological limitations, our findings suggest that the German version of the QCAE is suitable as a reliable and valid instrument for measuring empathy. Further studies in population-representative samples and clinical populations are required before a clear recommendation regarding its utilization can be provided.
引用
收藏
页码:454 / 459
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Error monitoring and empathy: Explorations within a neurophysiological context [J].
Amiruddin, Azhani ;
Fueggle, Simone N. ;
Nguyen, An T. ;
Gignac, Gilles E. ;
Clunies-Ross, Karen L. ;
Fox, Allison M. .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 54 (06) :864-873
[2]  
Bennemann B., 2021, FRDERUNG PERSNLICHER, P32
[3]   Social cognitive dysfunction as a clinical marker: A systematic review of meta-analyses across 30 clinical conditions [J].
Cotter, Jack ;
Granger, Kiri ;
Backx, Rosa ;
Hobbs, Matthew ;
Looi, Chung Yen ;
Barnett, Jennifer H. .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2018, 84 :92-99
[4]   Empathy: A Review of the Concept [J].
Cuff, Benjamin M. P. ;
Brown, Sarah J. ;
Taylor, Laura ;
Howat, Douglas J. .
EMOTION REVIEW, 2016, 8 (02) :144-153
[5]  
DAVIS MH, 1983, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V44
[6]   Toward a consensus on the nature of empathy: A review of reviews [J].
Eklund, Jakob Hakansson ;
Meranius, Martina Summer .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2021, 104 (02) :300-307
[7]   Therapist Empathy and Client Outcome: An Updated Meta-Analysis [J].
Elliott, Robert ;
Bohart, Arthur C. ;
Watson, Jeanne C. ;
Murphy, David .
PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2018, 55 (04) :399-410
[8]  
Frstl H., 2012, HRSG THEORY MIND
[9]   Are empathic abilities learnable? Implications for social neuroscientific research from psychometric assessments [J].
Georgi, Erik ;
Petermann, Franz ;
Schipper, Marc .
SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 9 (01) :74-81
[10]   Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives [J].
Hu, Li-tze ;
Bentler, Peter M. .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 1999, 6 (01) :1-55