Comparison of Sentinel Lymph Node Sampling with Positron Emission Tomography in the Evaluation of Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients

被引:0
作者
Ozsoy, Mehmet Sait [1 ]
Demir, Mustafa [2 ]
Baysal, Hakan [1 ]
Tatoglu, Mehmet Tarik [3 ]
Buyuker, Fatih [1 ]
Sermet, Medeni [1 ]
Eren, Tunc [1 ]
Ekinci, Ozgur [1 ]
Alimoglu, Orhan [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Medeniyet Univ, Goztepe Prof Dr Suleyman Yalcin City Hosp, Med Fac, Gen Surg Dept, Dr Erkin St 1, TR-34722 Kadikoy, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Hlth Sci Univ Kocaeli, Derince Training & Res Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Kocaeli, Turkiye
[3] Istanbul Medeniyet Univ, Goztepe Prof Dr Suleyman Yalcin City Hosp, Med Fac, Nucl Med Dept, Istanbul, Turkiye
来源
BANGLADESH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE | 2024年 / 23卷 / 04期
关键词
breast cancer; axillary lymph node dissection; positron emission tomography; sentinel lymph node biopsy; FDG-PET; F-18; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE; BIOPSY; PERFORMANCE; DISSECTION; RELEVANCE; STANDARD; SURGERY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Axillary lymph node status is the most important prognostic factor in breast cancer patients.: This study was carried out to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET/CT as a non-invasive technique and intraoperative frozen biopsy of sentinel lymphadenectomy (SLNB) in detecting axillary lymph node metastasis. Materials and Methods This study was carried out retrospectively on 44 patients diagnosed with breast cancer, who underwent preoperative FDGPET/CT imaging and intraoperative SLNB, at the General Surgery Clinic of Istanbul Medeniyet University G & ouml;ztepe Training and Research Hospital. The axilla was clinically negative in all patients. Preopative FDG-PET/CT imaging and intraoperative SLNB were performed. FDG-PET/CT results were compared with the histopathological results of SLNB and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Results According to the pathology results of axillary dissection, metastatic nodes were detected in 22 of 44 cases, and FDG-PET/CT imaging gave false-negative results in 10. The number of false negative cases of SLNB was 3; Axillary involvement was detected as a result of pathology in one of them, while the others were evaluated as skip metastases. The sensitivity of SLNB and FDG-PET/CT imaging was measured as 86.3% and 54.5%. The specificity values were 95.4% and 100%. FDG-PET/CT imaging has low sensitivity; specificity and positive predictive value were at acceptable levels. Conclusion The sensitivity of FDG-PET/CT imaging is low in detecting axillary involvement, and SLNB is needed in those with negative axillary involvement in FDG-PET/CT imaging. In our study, SLNB examination was superior to FDG-PET/CT imaging in detecting axillary nodal status.
引用
收藏
页码:1083 / 1094
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Feasibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients clinically suspected of axillary lymph node metastasis on preoperative imaging
    Kwak, Hee Yong
    Chae, Byung Joo
    Bae, Ja Seong
    Kim, Eun Jin
    Chang, Eun Young
    Kim, Sang Hoon
    Jung, Sang Seol
    Song, Byung Joo
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 11
  • [32] Predictors for extensive nodal involvement in breast cancer patients with axillary lymph node metastases
    Verheuvel, N. C.
    Ooms, H. W. A.
    Tjan-Heijnen, V. C. G.
    Roumen, R. M. H.
    Voogd, A. C.
    BREAST, 2016, 27 : 175 - 181
  • [33] A Prospective Evaluation of Positron Emission Tomography Scanning, Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy, and Standard Axillary Dissection for Axillary Staging in Patients with Early Stage Breast Cancer
    Peter J. Lovrics
    Vicky Chen
    Geoff Coates
    Sylvie D. Cornacchi
    Charlie H. Goldsmith
    Calvin Law
    Mark N. Levine
    Ken Sanders
    Ved R. Tandan
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2004, 11 : 846 - 853
  • [34] In breast cancer patients sentinel lymph node metastasis characteristics predict further axillary involvement
    Illyes, Ildiko
    Tokes, Anna-Maria
    Kovacs, Attila
    Szasz, A. Marcell
    Molnar, Bela A.
    Molnar, Istvan A.
    Kaszas, Ilona
    Baranyak, Zsuzsanna
    Laszlo, Zsolt
    Kenessey, Istvan
    Kulka, Janina
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2014, 465 (01) : 15 - 24
  • [35] A prospective evaluation of positron emission tomography scanning, sentinel lymph node biopsy, and standard axillary dissection for axillary staging in patients with early stage breast cancer
    Lovrics, PJ
    Chen, V
    Coates, G
    Cornacchi, SD
    Goldsmith, CH
    Law, C
    Levine, MN
    Sanders, K
    Tandan, VR
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 11 (09) : 846 - 853
  • [36] Three–Axillary Lymph Node Sampling for the Prediction of Nonsentinel Node Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients With Sentinel Node Metastases
    Kazuyoshi Motomura
    Chiyomi Egawa
    Yoshifumi Komoike
    Sachiko Nagumo
    Hiroki Koyama
    Hideo Inaji
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2006, 13 : 985 - 989
  • [37] Cost comparison of two surgical strategies in the treatment of breast cancer:: Sentinel lymph node biopsy versus axillary lymph node dissection
    Perrier, L
    Nessah, K
    Morelle, M
    Mignotte, H
    Carrère, MO
    Brémond, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2004, 20 (04) : 449 - 454
  • [38] Axillary dissection in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer: Is the staging information worthwhile for patients?
    Chang, David W.
    Bressel, Mathias
    Hansen, Carmen
    Blinman, Prunella
    Schofield, Penelope
    Chua, Boon H.
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 17 (02) : E27 - E34
  • [39] Predicting Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer Patients with Sentinel Lymph Node Involvement: Evaluation of Two Scoring Systems
    Sanjuan, Alex
    Escaramis, Georgia
    Vidal-Sicart, Sergi
    Illa, Miriam
    Zanon, Gabriel
    Pahisa, Jaume
    Rubi, Sebastia
    Velasco, Martin
    Santamaria, Gorane
    Farrus, Blanca
    Munoz, Montse
    Garcia, Yolanda
    Luis Fernandez, Pedro
    Pons, Francesca
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2010, 16 (02) : 134 - 140
  • [40] Sentinel node biopsy to avoid axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer
    Motomura K.
    Komoike Y.
    Nagumo S.
    Kasugai T.
    Hasegawa Y.
    Inaji H.
    Noguchi S.
    Koyama H.
    Breast Cancer, 2002, 9 (4) : 337 - 343