Intention to participate in smartphone-based data collection: the case of smallholder farmers in Uganda

被引:0
作者
Aparo, Nathaline Onek [1 ,2 ]
Deltomme, Berre [2 ]
Odongo, Walter [1 ]
De Steur, Hans [2 ]
机构
[1] Gulu Univ, Dept Rural Dev & Agribusiness, Gulu, Uganda
[2] Univ Ghent, Dept Agr Econ, Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Intention; smallholder farmers; smartphone-based data collection; survey; extended technology acceptance model; Uganda; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; BEHAVIORAL INTENTION; MOBILE PHONE; RANDOMIZED-RESPONSE; MEASUREMENT ERROR; TAM; ADOPTION; INFORMATION; SERVICES; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1080/02681102.2024.2414402
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Smartphone technology is increasingly being used to conduct surveys, including in low-income countries where the timely collection of socio-economic data is of great importance. This study investigated the intention of Ugandan smallholder farmers to participate in smartphone-based data collection (SPDC). The data was collected through a cross-sectional survey of 306 smallholder farmers. The results show that the willingness of farmers to participate in SPDC is high. The intention to participate in SPDC is directly influenced by attitude, subjective norms and perceived enjoyment. Indirect influences are perceived usefulness, perceived trustworthiness and perceived cost through their effects on attitude. Similarly, perceived ease of use indirectly influences intention through its effects on perceived usefulness and perceived enjoyment. Statistically significant differences were found in terms of age, gender, mobile phone ownership and education. These results show the great potential of SPDC for data collection in Uganda for researchers, policy makers, agribusinesses and stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 161 条
  • [91] Lavrakas P., 2017, The Future Of U.S. General Population Telephone Survey Research-AAPOR
  • [92] Predicting intention to use alternative dispute resolution (ADR): an empirical test of theory of planned behaviour (TPB) model
    Lee, Chia Kuang
    Yiu, Tak Wing
    Cheung, Sai On
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21 (01) : 27 - 40
  • [93] Factors Influencing the Technology Adoption Behaviours of Litchi Farmers in China
    Li, Hui
    Huang, Diejun
    Ma, Qiuzhuo
    Qi, Wene
    Li, Hua
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (01)
  • [94] Factors Influencing Online Shopping Behavior: The Mediating Role of Purchase Intention
    Lim, Yi Jin
    Osman, Abdullah
    Salahuddin, Shahrul Nizam
    Romle, Abdul Rahim
    Abdullah, Safizal
    [J]. 7TH INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS & BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (IEBMC 2015), 2016, 35 : 401 - 410
  • [95] Determinants of accepting wireless mobile data services in China
    Lu, June
    Liu, Chang
    Yu, Chun-Sheng
    Wang, Kanliang
    [J]. INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2008, 45 (01) : 52 - 64
  • [96] Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking
    Luarn, P
    Lin, HH
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2005, 21 (06) : 873 - 891
  • [97] Modeling factors explaining the acceptance, actual use and satisfaction of nurses using an Electronic Patient Record in acute care settings: An extension of the UTAUT
    Maillet, Eric
    Mathieu, Luc
    Sicotte, Claude
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2015, 84 (01) : 36 - 47
  • [98] Malhotra Y., 1999, 32 HAW INT C SYST SC
  • [99] Willingness of Participation in an Application-Based Digital Data Collection among Different Social Groups and Smartphone User Clusters
    Mate, Akos
    Rakovics, Zsofia
    Rudas, Szilvia
    Wallis, Levente
    Sagvari, Bence
    Huszar, Akos
    Koltai, Julia
    [J]. SENSORS, 2023, 23 (09)
  • [100] The role of knowledge, attitudes and perceptions in the uptake of agricultural and agroforestry innovations among smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa
    Meijer, Seline S.
    Catacutan, Delia
    Ajayi, Oluyede C.
    Sileshi, Gudeta W.
    Nieuwenhuis, Maarten
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 13 (01) : 40 - 54