Re/connecting with "home": a mixed methods study of service provider and patient perspectives to facilitate implementing rehabilitation in the home for reconditioning

被引:0
作者
Warner, Kerry N. [1 ,2 ]
Poulos, Roslyn G. [1 ,2 ]
Cole, Andrew M. [1 ,3 ]
Nguyen, Tuan-Anh [4 ]
Un, Fey-Ching [1 ]
Faux, Steven G. [3 ,5 ]
Kohler, Friedbert [1 ,3 ]
Alexander, Tara [6 ]
Capell, Jacquelin T. [6 ]
Hilvert, Dan R. [7 ]
O'Connor, Claire M. C. [1 ,8 ,9 ]
Poulos, Christopher J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] HammondCare, Sydney, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Sch Populat Hlth, Sydney, Australia
[3] Univ New South Wales, Sch Clin Med, Sydney, Australia
[4] South Western Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Sydney, Australia
[5] St Vincents Hosp, Sydney, Australia
[6] Univ Wollongong, Australasian Rehabil Outcomes Ctr, Wollongong, Australia
[7] Hilvert Advisory, Sydney, Australia
[8] Univ New South Wales, Sch Psychol, Sydney, Australia
[9] Neurosci Res Australia, Sydney, Australia
关键词
Rehabilitation; home; rehabilitation in the home; home-based rehabilitation; qualitative research; reconditioning; deconditioning; SUPPORTED DISCHARGE SERVICES; INPATIENT REHABILITATION; THERAPEUTIC LANDSCAPES; STROKE REHABILITATION; HIP FRACTURE; OLDER-PEOPLE; HEALTH-CARE; INDEPENDENCE; EXPERIENCES; PLACE;
D O I
10.1080/09638288.2024.2386157
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
PurposeTo explore the views of healthcare professionals and patients about the advantages and disadvantages of rehabilitation in the home (RITH) for reconditioning, and identify factors that should contribute to the successful implementation of a consensus-based RITH model for reconditioning.Materials and methodsInterviews with 24 healthcare professionals and 21 surveys (comprising Likert scale and free text responses) of inpatients undergoing rehabilitation for reconditioning provided study data. Interpretive thematic analysis was used to analyse interview data; descriptive statistics analysed Likert scale responses; patient written responses assisted with the interpretation of themes developed from the interview data.ResultsTwo major themes were elicited in this study: the home is a physical setting and the home is a lived space. Advantages and disadvantages of RITH for patients, carers and healthcare professionals were identified within these themes. Appropriate patient selection; effective communication with patients and carers, and within RITH teams; adequate patient and carer support; ensuring the safety of patients and staff; and education of patients, carers and healthcare professionals are essential for the satisfactory implementation of RITH.ConclusionThe concept of home shapes the delivery of RITH. Recognising the advantages and disadvantages of RITH highlights important considerations needed to successfully implement RITH for reconditioning. The home setting facilitates a person-centred approach to care, especially when staff consider patients to be equal partners in their care.Home offers an opportunity to negotiate contextually relevant rehabilitation goals with patients.Effective communication between patients, their local doctor, family, and rehabilitation staff is essential for the successful delivery of rehabilitation in the home.Safety concerns (for patients and staff) and the shift in the burden of care from hospital staff to family must be adequately addressed prior to the commencement of rehabilitation in the home.
引用
收藏
页码:1965 / 1975
页数:11
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   The three pillars of patient experience: identifying key drivers of patient experience to improve quality in healthcare [J].
Adams, Corey ;
Walpola, Ramesh ;
Iqbal, Maha Pervaz ;
Schembri, Anthony ;
Harrison, Reema .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-HEIDELBERG, 2024,
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, GUIDE UNIFORM DATA S
[3]   Understanding the dimensions of home that impact on home modification decision making [J].
Aplin, Tammy ;
de Jonge, Desleigh ;
Gustafsson, Louise .
AUSTRALIAN OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY JOURNAL, 2013, 60 (02) :101-109
[4]  
Australasian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre (AROC), 2020, AROC ANN REP STAT IN
[5]  
Australasian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre (AROC), 2019, AROC IMP SPEC REP RE
[6]   The Stanford Hall consensus statement for post-COVID-19 rehabilitation [J].
Barker-Davies, Robert M. ;
O'Sullivan, Oliver ;
Senaratne, Kahawalage Pumi Prathima ;
Baker, Polly ;
Cranley, Mark ;
Dharm-Datta, Shreshth ;
Ellis, Henrietta ;
Goodall, Duncan ;
Gough, Michael ;
Lewis, Sarah ;
Norman, Jonathan ;
Papadopoulou, Theodora ;
Roscoe, David ;
Sherwood, Daniel ;
Turner, Philippa ;
Walker, Tammy ;
Mistlin, Alan ;
Phillip, Rhodri ;
Nicol, Alastair M. ;
Bennett, Alexander N. ;
Bahadur, Sardar .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 54 (16) :949-959
[7]   One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? [J].
Braun, Virginia ;
Clarke, Victoria .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) :328-352
[8]   Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis [J].
Braun, Virginia ;
Clarke, Victoria .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN SPORT EXERCISE AND HEALTH, 2019, 11 (04) :589-597
[9]   A conceptual review of engagement in healthcare and rehabilitation [J].
Bright, Felicity A. S. ;
Kayes, Nicola M. ;
Worrall, Linda ;
McPherson, Kathryn M. .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2015, 37 (08) :643-654
[10]   Effect of Inpatient Rehabilitation vs a Monitored Home-Based Program on Mobility in Patients With Total Knee Arthroplasty The HIHO Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Buhagiar, Mark A. ;
Naylor, Justine M. ;
Harris, Ian A. ;
Xuan, Wei ;
Kohler, Friedbert ;
Wright, Rachael ;
Fortunato, Renee .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 317 (10) :1037-1046