Long-term effects of once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality 21-year follow-up of the UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening randomised controlled trial

被引:11
作者
Wooldrage, Kate [1 ]
Robbins, Emma C. [1 ]
Duffy, Stephen W. [2 ]
Cross, Amanda J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Dept Surg & Canc, Canc Screening & Prevent Res Grp, London W2 1NY, England
[2] Queen Mary Univ London, Wolfson Inst Populat Hlth, Ctr Canc Screening Prevent & Early Diag, London, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
FEMALE SEX; COLONOSCOPY; RISK; AGE;
D O I
10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00190-0
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Flexible sigmoidoscopy screening reduces colorectal cancer incidence and mortality; however, uncertainty exists about the duration of protection and differences by sex and age. We assessed effects of once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening after 21 years' follow-up. Methods The UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial is a multicentre randomised controlled trial that recruited men and women aged 55-64 years from general practices serving 14 hospitals. Among participants indicating that they would attend flexible sigmoidoscopy screening if invited, randomisation (2:1) to the control (no further contact) or intervention (invited to once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening) group was performed centrally in blocks of 12, stratified by centre, general practice, and household type. Masking of intervention was infeasible. Primary outcomes were colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. The Kaplan-Meier method estimated cumulative incidence. Primary analyses estimated intention-to-treat hazard ratios (HRs) and risk differences, overall and stratified by subsite, sex, and age. The trial is registered with ISRCTN, number 28352761. Findings Among participants recruited between Nov 14, 1994, and March 30, 1999, 170432 were eligible and 113 195 were randomly assigned to the control group and 57 237 were randomly assigned to the intervention group. 406 participants were excluded from analyses (268 in the control group and 138 in the intervention group), leaving 112 927 participants in the control group (55 336 [49%] men and 57 591 [51%] women) and 57 099 in the intervention group (27 966 [49%] men and 29 103 [51%] women). Of participants who were invited to be screened, 40624 (71%) attended screening. Median follow-up was 21<middle dot>3 years (IQR 18<middle dot>0-22<middle dot>2). In the invited-to-screening group, colorectal cancer incidence was reduced compared with the control group (1631 vs 4201 cases; cumulative incidence at 21 years was 3<middle dot>18% [95% CI 3<middle dot>03 to 3<middle dot>34] vs 4<middle dot>16% [4<middle dot>04 to 4<middle dot>29]; HR 0<middle dot>76 [95% CI 0<middle dot>72 to 0<middle dot>81]) with 47 fewer cases per 100 000 person-years (95% CI -56 to -37). Colorectal cancer mortality was also reduced in the invited-to-screening group compared with the control group (502 vs 1329 deaths; cumulative incidence at 21 years was 0<middle dot>97% [0<middle dot>88 to 1<middle dot>06] vs 1<middle dot>33% [1<middle dot>26 to 1<middle dot>40]; HR 0<middle dot>75 [0<middle dot>67 to 0<middle dot>83]) with 16 fewer deaths per 100 000 person-years (-21 to -11). Effects were particularly evident in the distal colorectum (726 incident cancer cases in the invited-to-screening group vs 2434 cases in the control group; HR 0<middle dot>59 [0<middle dot>54 to 0<middle dot>64]; 47 fewer cases per 100 000 person-years [-54 to -41]; 196 cancer deaths in the invited-to- screening group vs 708 deaths in the control group; HR 0<middle dot>55 [0<middle dot>47 to 0<middle dot>64]; 15 fewer deaths per 100 000 person-years [-19 to -12]) and not the proximal colon (871 incident cancer cases in the invited-to-screening group vs 1749 cases in the control group; HR 0<middle dot>98 [0<middle dot>91 to 1<middle dot>07]; one fewer case per 100 000 person-years [-8 to 5]; 277 cancer deaths in the invited-to-screening group vs 547 deaths in the control group; HR 1<middle dot>00 [0<middle dot>86 to 1<middle dot>15]; zero fewer deaths per 100 000 person-years [-4 to 4]). The HR for colorectal cancer incidence was lower in men (0<middle dot>70 [0<middle dot>65-0<middle dot>76]) than women (0<middle dot>86 [0<middle dot>79 to 0<middle dot>93]; p interaction =0<middle dot>0007) but there was no difference by age. Interpretation We show that once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening reduces colorectal cancer incidence and mortality for two decades and provide important data to inform colorectal cancer screening guidelines.
引用
收藏
页码:811 / 824
页数:14
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Bowel cancer incidence statistics
[2]   Long-term effects of once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening after 17 years of follow-up: the UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening randomised controlled trial [J].
Atkin, Wendy ;
Wooldrage, Kate ;
Parkin, D. Maxwell ;
Kralj-Hans, Ines ;
MacRae, Eilidh ;
Shah, Urvi ;
Duffy, Stephen ;
Cross, Amanda J. .
LANCET, 2017, 389 (10076) :1299-1311
[3]   Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial [J].
Atkin, Wendy S. ;
Edwards, Rob ;
Kralj-Hans, Ines ;
Wooldrage, Kate ;
Hart, Andrew R. ;
Northover, John M. A. ;
Parkin, D. Max ;
Wardle, Jane ;
Duffy, Stephen W. ;
Cuzick, Jack .
LANCET, 2010, 375 (9726) :1624-1633
[4]   Single flexible sigmoidoscopy screening to prevent colorectal cancer: baseline findings of a UK multicentre randomised trial [J].
Atkin, WS ;
Cook, CF ;
Cuzick, J ;
Edwards, R ;
Northover, JMA ;
Wardle, J .
LANCET, 2002, 359 (9314) :1291-1300
[5]   PREVENTION OF COLORECTAL-CANCER BY ONCE-ONLY SIGMOIDOSCOPY [J].
ATKIN, WS ;
CUZICK, J ;
NORTHOVER, JMA ;
WHYNES, DK .
LANCET, 1993, 341 (8847) :736-740
[6]   Design of a multicentre randomised trial to evaluate flexible sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening [J].
Atkin, WS ;
Edwards, R ;
Wardle, J ;
Northover, JMA ;
Sutton, S ;
Hart, AR ;
Williams, CB ;
Cuzick, J .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2001, 8 (03) :137-144
[7]   Difference Between Left-Sided and Right-Sided Colorectal Cancer: A Focused Review of Literature [J].
Baran, Burcin ;
Ozupek, Nazli Mert ;
Tetik, Nihal Yerli ;
Acar, Emine ;
Bekcioglu, Omer ;
Baskin, Yasemin .
GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH, 2018, 11 (04) :264-273
[8]   Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death [J].
Bretthauer, M. ;
Loberg, M. ;
Wieszczy, P. ;
Kalager, M. ;
Emilsson, L. ;
Garborg, K. ;
Rupinski, M. ;
Dekker, E. ;
Spaander, M. ;
Bugajski, M. ;
Holme, O. ;
Zauber, A. G. ;
Pilonis, N. D. ;
Mroz, A. ;
Kuipers, E. J. ;
Shi, J. ;
Hernan, M. A. ;
Adami, H-O ;
Regula, J. ;
Hoff, G. ;
Kaminski, M. F. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2022, 387 (17) :1547-1556
[9]   Effect of once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on the outcomes of subsequent faecal occult blood test screening [J].
Brown, Jeremy P. ;
Wooldrage, Kate ;
Kralj-Hans, Ines ;
Wright, Suzanne ;
Cross, Amanda J. ;
Atkin, Wendy S. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2019, 26 (01) :11-18
[10]  
Cross A, Multicentre randomised controlled trial of 'once only' flexible sigmoidoscopy in prevention of bowel cancer morbidity and mortality (Study Short Title: The UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial (UKFSST))