A Unified Knowledge Graph to Permit Interoperability of Heterogenous Digital Evidence

被引:0
作者
Alshumrani, Ali [1 ,2 ]
Clarke, Nathan [1 ]
Ghita, Bogdan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Plymouth, Ctr Cyber Secur Commun & Network Res CSCAN, Plymouth, Devon, England
[2] Umm Al Qura Univ, Dept Informat Syst, Mecca, Saudi Arabia
来源
UBIQUITOUS SECURITY, UBISEC 2023 | 2024年 / 2034卷
关键词
Digital Forensics; Investigation; Cybercrime; Evidence Harmonisation; Interoperability; Ontology; Knowledge Graph; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1007/978-981-97-1274-8_27
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
The modern digital world is highly heterogeneous, encompassing a wide variety of communications, devices, and services. This interconnectedness generates, synchronises, stores, and presents digital information in multidimensional, complex formats, often fragmented across multiple sources. When linked to misuse, this digital information becomes vital digital evidence. Integrating and harmonising these diverse formats into a unified system is crucial for comprehensively understanding evidence and its relationships. However, existing approaches to date have faced challenges limiting investigators' ability to query heterogeneous evidence across large datasets. This paper presents a novel approach in the form of a modern unified data graph. The proposed approach aims to seamlessly integrate, harmonise, and unify evidence data, enabling cross-platform interoperability, efficient data queries, and improved digital investigation performance. To demonstrate its efficacy, a case study is conducted, highlighting the benefits of the proposed approach and showcasing its effectiveness in enabling the interoperability required for advanced analytics in digital investigations.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 435
页数:16
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Alshumrani A, 2023, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBER WARFARE AND SECURITY ICCWS, P466
  • [2] Formal knowledge model for online social network forensics
    Arshad, Humaira
    Jantan, Aman
    Hoon, Gan Keng
    Abiodun, Isaac Oludare
    [J]. COMPUTERS & SECURITY, 2020, 89
  • [3] DESO: Addressing volume and variety in large-scale criminal cases
    Brady, Owen
    Overill, Richard
    Keppens, Jeroen
    [J]. DIGITAL INVESTIGATION, 2015, 15 : 72 - 82
  • [4] Casey E., 2018, LGTS, V39, P43, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-74872-6_4
  • [5] The chequered past and risky future of digital forensics
    Casey, Eoghan
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2019, 51 (06) : 649 - 664
  • [6] Leveraging CybOX™ to standardize representation and exchange of digital forensic information
    Casey, Eoghan
    Back, Greg
    Barnum, Sean
    [J]. DIGITAL INVESTIGATION, 2015, 12 : S102 - S110
  • [7] Research Trends, Challenges, and Emerging Topics in Digital Forensics: A Review of Reviews
    Casino, Fran
    Dasaklis, Thomas K.
    Spathoulas, Georgios P.
    Anagnostopoulos, Marios
    Ghosal, Amrita
    Borocz, Istvan
    Solanas, Agusti
    Conti, Mauro
    Patsakis, Constantinos
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 25464 - 25493
  • [8] An ontology-based approach for the reconstruction and analysis of digital incidents timelines
    Chabot, Yoan
    Bertaux, Aurelie
    Nicolle, Christophe
    Kechadi, Tahar
    [J]. DIGITAL INVESTIGATION, 2015, 15 : 83 - 100
  • [9] Chikul Pavel, 2021, Model and Data Engineering. 10th International Conference, MEDI 2021. Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS 12732), P67, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-78428-7_6
  • [10] Lillis D, 2016, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:1604.03850