Hyperspectral reflectance and machine learning for multi-site monitoring of cotton growth

被引:3
作者
Flynn, K. Colton [1 ]
Witt, Travis W. [2 ]
Baath, Gurjinder S. [3 ]
Chinmayi, H. K. [1 ]
Smith, Douglas R. [1 ]
Gowda, Prasanna H. [4 ]
Ashworth, Amanda J. [5 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Grassland Soil & Water Res Lab, 808 E Blackland Rd, Temple, TX 76502 USA
[2] USDA ARS, Oklahoma & Cent Plains Agr Res Ctr, 7207W Cheyenne St, El Reno, OK 73036 USA
[3] Texas A&M AgriLife Res, Blackland Res & Extens Ctr, 720 E Blackland Rd, Temple, TX 76502 USA
[4] USDA ARS, Southeast Area, 114 Expt Stn Rd, Stoneville, MS 38776 USA
[5] USDA ARS, Poultry Prod & Prod Safety Res, 1260W Maple St, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
来源
SMART AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY | 2024年 / 9卷
关键词
Remote sensing; Cotton; SVM; Random forest; CHIME; LEAF-AREA INDEX; CHLOROPHYLL METER; YIELD; NITROGEN; INFORMATION; ALGORITHMS; STRESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.atech.2024.100536
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Hyperspectral measurements can help with rapid decision-making and collecting data across multiple locations. However, there are multiple data processing methods (Savisky-Golay [SG], first derivative [FD], and normalization) and analyses (partial least squares regression [PLS], weighted k-nearest neighbor [KKNN], support vector machine [SVM], and random forest [RF]) that can be used to determine the best relationship between physical measurements and hyperspectral data. In the current study, FD was the best method for data processing and SVM was the best model for predicting average cotton (Gossypium spp. Malvaceae) height and nodes. However, the combination of FD and RF were best at predicting cotton leaf area index, canopy cover, and chlorophyll content across the growing season. Additionally, results from models developed by both SVM and RF were closely related to pseudo-CHIME satellite wavebands, where in-situ hyperspectral data were matched to the spectral resolutions of a future hyperspectral satellite. The information and results presented will aid producers and other members of the cotton industry to make rapid and meaningful decisions that could result in greater yield and sustainable intensification.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Big Data and Machine Learning With Hyperspectral Information in Agriculture
    Ang, Kenneth Li-Minn
    Seng, Jasmine Kah Phooi
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 36699 - 36718
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2020, Chime (Copernicus hyperspectral imaging mission for the environment)
  • [3] Large-area maize yield forecasting using leaf area index based yield model
    Baez-Gonzalez, AD
    Kiniry, JR
    Maas, SJ
    Tiscareno, M
    Macias, J
    Mendoza, JL
    Richardson, CW
    Salinas, J
    Manjarrez, JR
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2005, 97 (02) : 418 - 425
  • [4] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [5] In-season nitrogen status sensing in irrigated cotton: II. Leaf nitrogen and biomass
    Bronson, KF
    Chua, TT
    Booker, JD
    Keeling, JW
    Lascano, RJ
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2003, 67 (05) : 1439 - 1448
  • [6] Knowledge-based analysis of microarray gene expression data by using support vector machines
    Brown, MPS
    Grundy, WN
    Lin, D
    Cristianini, N
    Sugnet, CW
    Furey, TS
    Ares, M
    Haussler, D
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2000, 97 (01) : 262 - 267
  • [7] Cao FX, 2017, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:1710.02939, 10.48550/arXiv.1710.02939, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.1710.02939]
  • [8] Effect of Water Logging Stress on Cotton Leaf Area Index and Yield
    Cao Guang
    Wang Xiugui
    Liu Yu
    Luo Wenbing
    [J]. 2012 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODERN HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING, 2012, 28 : 202 - 209
  • [9] The yield potential of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)
    Constable, G. A.
    Bange, M. P.
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2015, 182 : 98 - 106
  • [10] Croonen J, 2020, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2005.05139