A systematic review of Grammarly in L2 English writing contexts

被引:0
|
作者
Dizon, Gilbert [1 ]
Gayed, John M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Himeji Dokkyo Univ, Int Languages & Cultures, Himeji, Japan
[2] Waseda Univ, Global Educ Ctr, Tokyo, Japan
来源
COGENT EDUCATION | 2024年 / 11卷 / 01期
关键词
Automatic writing evaluation; automated corrective feedback; artificial intelligence; English as a foreign language; second language writing; computer-assisted language learning; Information and communication technology (ICT); applied linguistics; language teaching and learning; PERCEPTIONS; CHECKERS; AWE;
D O I
10.1080/2331186X.2024.2397882
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The use of automated writing evaluation (AWE) in second language (L2) writing contexts has increased dramatically, as evidenced by the large body of research published on the topic over the past decade. Considering this, several systematic reviews on AWE have been published. Nevertheless, none of these review studies has exclusively focused on the use of Grammarly in L2 writing contexts. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to investigate the trends, methodologies, and results in Grammarly research involving L2 learners. Web of Science and Scopus were searched by title, abstract, and keywords for relevant peer-reviewed literature published between 2009 and 2023. Twenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Regarding trends and methodologies, results showed that the bulk of L2 research on Grammarly has incorporated a quantitative element. Studies also tended to involve university students and lasted shorter than 15 weeks. Thematic analysis revealed two affordances and a constraint regarding Grammarly in L2 writing. Namely, the AWE system has an effective instructional design that supports L2 English writing. However, it also lacks teaching presence due to feedback-related issues. The article concludes with pedagogical implications and directions for future research.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The effects of L1 and L2 writers' varying politeness modification in English emails on L1 and L2 readers
    Hendriks, Berna
    van Meurs, Frank
    Kakisina, Bob
    JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, 2023, 204 : 33 - 49
  • [32] View-Specific Assessment of L2 Spoken English
    Banno, S.
    Balusu, B.
    Gales, M. J. F.
    Knill, K. M.
    Kyriakopoulos, K.
    INTERSPEECH 2022, 2022, : 4471 - 4475
  • [33] TEEMI: A Speaking Practice Tool for L2 English Learners
    Chen, Szu-Yu
    Lo, Tien-Hong
    Sung, Yao-Ting
    Tseng, Ching-Yu
    Chen, Berlin
    INTERSPEECH 2024, 2024, : 2048 - 2049
  • [34] Speak & Improve: L2 English Speaking Practice Tool
    Nicholls, Diane
    Knill, Kate
    Gales, Mark J. F.
    Ragni, Anton
    Ricketts, Paul
    INTERSPEECH 2023, 2023, : 3669 - 3670
  • [35] The use of paraphrase in summary writing: A comparison of L1 and L2 writers
    Keck, Casey
    JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2006, 15 (04) : 261 - 278
  • [36] Putting the Writing Process into Action in the L2 Classroom: Pre-writing Techniques that Work
    Byrd, David R.
    JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE TEACHING AND LEARNING, 2011, 1 (01): : 64 - 77
  • [37] Register variation in L1 and L2 student writing A multidimensional analysis
    Goulart, Larissa
    REGISTER STUDIES, 2021, 3 (01) : 115 - 143
  • [38] Using automated written corrective feedback in the writing classrooms: effects on L2 writing accuracy
    Barrot, Jessie S.
    COMPUTER ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2023, 36 (04) : 584 - 607
  • [39] Investigating pragmatic failure in L2 English email writing among Japanese university EFL learners A learner corpus approach
    Nicholas, Allan
    Blake, John
    Mozgovoy, Maxim
    Perkins, Jeremy
    REGISTER STUDIES, 2023, 5 (01) : 23 - 51
  • [40] Effects of Task Complexity on L2 Writing Behaviors and Linguistic Complexity
    Revesz, Andrea
    Kourtali, Nektaria-Efstathia
    Mazgutova, Diana
    LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2017, 67 (01) : 208 - 241