Efficacy of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy for Pain Management After Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery. A Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:0
|
作者
Ferragina, Francesco [1 ]
Caruso, Davide [1 ]
Barca, Ida [1 ]
Kallaverja, Elvis [1 ]
Arrotta, Antonella [2 ]
Cristofaro, Maria Giulia [1 ]
机构
[1] Magna Graecia Univer, Dept Expt & Clin Med, Unit Maxillofacial Surg, Viale Europa, I-88100 Catanzaro, Italy
[2] Magna Graecia Univ Catanzaro, Dept Med & Surg Sci, Catanzaro, Italy
关键词
VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; RATING-SCALE; DOUBLE-BLIND; VAS; NRS;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2024.02.011
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: Postoperative pain and swelling associated with the removal of the third molar (M3) adversely affect the patient's quality of life. Purpose: The study aims to measure pain reduction and analgesic use in patients treated with pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy following M3 removal and compares it to patients who did not receive PEMF. Study Design, Setting, Sample: The single-center study was designed as a randomized, prospective, controlled, double-blinded trial on a sample of patients with impacted mandibular M3 ascertained by x-ray orthopantomography and computed tomography. Predictor/Exposure/Independent Variables: The predictor variable is postoperative pain management. It was assigned randomly to each subject who received either PEMF or standard therapy. Main outcome Variables: The pain was quantified using a 100 mm visual analog scale and the number of analgesics taken. Each subject kept a daily clinical diary for 7 days, recording the amount of pain using the visual analog scale and the number of analgesic tablets taken. Covariates: The study covariates were age, sex, tobacco use, and Pell and Gregory's classification of M3s. Analyses: Student's t test was used, placing the statistical significance for P value < .05. The primary planned analysis was a 2-group, continuity-corrected, c 2 test of equality of proportions. Results: The study sample included 90 patients, 47 men and 43 women, with an average age of 32.43 +/- 8.80 years. PEMF was statistically associated with improved pain reduction (2.08 vs 5.04 with a P value = .0002) and consumption of fewer analgesics than the control group (2.6 vs 5.8 with a P value = .0062). Conclusions and Relevance: The study's results attest to the effectiveness of PEMF therapy in pain control after M3 surgery. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. This is an open access article under the CCBY license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:692 / 698
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative analgesic efficacy of intramuscular dexamethasone, ketorolac, tramadol, and butorphanol with regard to postoperative pain after mandibular third molar surgery
    Chakraborty, Pallavi Khan
    Shai, Adithya
    Tilak, Balaganga Dhar P.
    Kumar, Abhinav
    Kamdar, Arbab
    Niranjana, Archana
    Kisave, Parag Narayan
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2024, 16 : 1378 - 1380
  • [42] 4% Articaine and 2% Lignocaine for Surgical Removal of Third Molar by Mandibular Nerve Block: A Randomized Clinical Trial for Efficacy and Safety
    Saralaya, Shruthi
    Adirajaiah, Sahana B.
    Anehosur, Venkatesh
    JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL & ORAL SURGERY, 2019, 18 (03): : 405 - 411
  • [43] Efficiency of topical and systemic flurbiprofen on pain and edema after impacted third molar surgery and comparison of gastrointestinal adverse effects
    Cebi, Ahmet Taylan
    CUKUROVA MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 45 (01): : 141 - 147
  • [44] Safety and Efficacy of Vocacapsaicin for Management of Postsurgical Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Shafer, Steven L.
    Teichman, Sam L.
    Gottlieb, Ira J.
    Singla, Neil
    Minkowitz, Harold S.
    Leiman, David
    Vaughn, Benjamin
    Donovan, John F.
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 141 (02) : 250 - 261
  • [45] Evaluation of the Efficacy of Pulsed Electromagnetic Therapy in the Treatment of Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria
    Oke, K. I.
    Umebese, P. F. A.
    WEST INDIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 62 (03): : 205 - 209
  • [46] Extraoral low-level laser therapy can decrease pain but not edema and trismus after surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial
    Momeni, Ehsan
    Kazemi, Farahnaz
    Sanaei-rad, Parisa
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [47] Comparison between closure and absence of closure after removal of fully impacted mandibular third molar: A prospective randomized study
    Ricard, A. S.
    Nau, O.
    Veyret, A.
    Majoufre-Lefebvre, C.
    Laurentjoye, M.
    REVUE DE STOMATOLOGIE DE CHIRURGIE MAXILLO-FACIALE ET DE CHIRURGIE ORALE, 2015, 116 (01) : 12 - 17
  • [48] Efficacy of Naproxen Plus Gabapentin Versus Naproxen Alone in Relieving Post-Extraction Pain of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar
    Khatoon, Safia
    Shaikh, Muhammad Ilyas
    Mahmood, Arslan
    Harjani, Priya Rani
    Suresh, Sarang
    Kumari, Bharti
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2021, 15 (12): : 3264 - 3267
  • [49] Comparative Assessment of the Effect of Ibuprofen and Etodolac on Edema, Trismus, and Pain in Lower Third Molar Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Silva de Oliveira, Julio Cesar
    Grossi de Oliveira, Gustavo Augusto
    Farnezi Bassi, Ana Paula
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 74 (08) : 1524 - 1530
  • [50] Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Bromelain with Paracetamol on Postoperative Sequelae after Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar: A Split-mouth Randomised Clinical Study
    Mittal, Ananya
    Ramanojam, Shandilya
    Khandelwal, Saurabh
    Pawar, Sudhir
    Nair, Vivek
    Valiulla, Mohamed Umer
    Medankar, Apurva
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2023, 17 (09) : ZC10 - ZC15