Assessment of different head tilt angles in volumetric modulated arc therapy for hippocampus-avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy

被引:1
|
作者
Yuan, Cuiyun [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Sisi [1 ,2 ]
Li, Yang [1 ,2 ]
Quan, Enzhuo [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Dongjie [1 ,2 ]
Liang, Jun [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Chenbin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Canc Hosp, Natl Canc Ctr, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Shenzhen Hosp, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2024年 / 14卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
radiation therapy; whole brain radiotherapy; hippocampus avoidance; volumetric modulated arc therapy; head tilt; RADIATION-THERAPY; IMRT;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2024.1415471
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose In the field of radiation therapy for brain metastases, whole-brain hippocampus-avoidance treatment is commonly employed. this study aims to examine the impact of different head tilt angles on the dose distribution in the whole-brain target area and organs at risk. It also aims to determine the head tilt angle to achieve optimal radiation therapy outcomes.Methods CT images were collected from 8 brain metastases patients at 5 different groups of head tilt angle. The treatment plans were designed using the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique. The 5 groups of tilt angle were as follows: [0 degrees,10 degrees), [10 degrees,20 degrees), [20 degrees,30 degrees), [30 degrees,40 degrees), and [40 degrees,45 degrees]. The analysis involved assessing parameters such as the uniformity index, conformity index, average dose delivered to the target, dose coverage of the target, hot spots within the target area, maximum dose, and average dose received by organs at risk. Additionally, the study evaluated the correlation between hippocampal dose and other factors, and established linear regression models.Results Significant differences in dosimetric results were observed between the [40 degrees,45 degrees] and [0 degrees,10 degrees) head tilt angles. The [40 degrees,45 degrees] angle showed significant differences compared to the [0 degrees,10 degrees) angle in the average dose in the target area (31.49 +/- 0.29 Gy vs. 31.99 +/- 0.29 Gy, p=0.016), dose uniformity (1.20 +/- 0.03 vs. 1.24 +/- 0.03, p=0.016), hotspots in the target area (33.64 +/- 0.35 Gy vs. 34.42 +/- 0.49 Gy, p=0.016), maximum hippocampal dose (10.73 +/- 0.36 Gy vs. 11.66 +/- 0.59 Gy, p=0.008), maximum dose in the lens (2.82 +/- 1.10 Gy vs. 4.99 +/- 0.16 Gy, p=0.016), and average dose in the lens (1.93 +/- 0.29 Gy vs. 4.22 +/- 0.26 Gy, p=0.008). There is a moderate correlation between the maximum dose in the hippocampi and the PTV length (r=0.49, p=0.001). Likewise, the mean dose in the hippocampi is significantly correlated with the hippocampi length (r=0.34, p=0.04).Conclusion The VMAT plan with a head tilt angle of [40 degrees,45 degrees] met all dose constraints and demonstrated improved uniformity of the target area while reducing the dose to organs at risk. Furthermore, the linear regression models suggest that increasing the head tilt angle within the current range of [0 degrees,45 degrees] is likely to lead to a decrease in the average hippocampal dose.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy in Head and Neck Radiotherapy: A Planning Comparison using Simultaneous Integrated Boost for Nasopharynx and Oropharynx Carcinoma
    Johnston, M.
    Clifford, S.
    Bromley, R.
    Back, M.
    Oliver, L.
    Eade, T.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 23 (08) : 503 - 511
  • [32] Hippocampal avoidance with volumetric modulated arc therapy in melanoma brain metastases - the first Australian experience
    Awad, Raef
    Fogarty, Gerald
    Hong, Angela
    Kelly, Patricia
    Ng, Diana
    Santos, Daniel
    Haydu, Lauren
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2013, 8
  • [33] Intensity-modulated radiotherapy or volumetric-modulated arc therapy in patients with head and neck cancer: Focus on salivary glands dosimetry
    Vallard, Alexis
    Guy, Jean-Baptiste
    Ndong, Sylvie Mengue
    Vial, Nicolas
    Rivoirard, Romain
    Auberdiac, Pierre
    Mery, Benoite
    Langrand-Escure, Julien
    Espenel, Sophie
    Moncharmont, Coralie
    Ben Mrad, Majed
    Diao, Peng
    Goyet, Dominique
    Magne, Nicolas
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2016, 38 (07): : 1028 - 1034
  • [34] Modulated Arc Therapy for hippocampal-avoidance whole brain radiation therapy: planning comparison with intensity modulated Radiation Therapy
    Martin-Tovar, E. A.
    Badillo-Alvarado, A. H.
    Cocom-Poot, L. E.
    Gaxiola-Sosa, J. L.
    RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS, 2024, 63 (03) : 443 - 454
  • [35] Assessment of multi-criteria optimization (MCO) for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiation therapy (HA-WBRT)
    Zieminski, Stephen
    Khandekar, Melin
    Wang, Yi
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (02): : 184 - 190
  • [36] Is there a dosimetric advantage of volumetric modulated arc therapy over intensity modulated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer?
    Nikolett Buciuman
    Loredana G. Marcu
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2022, 279 : 5311 - 5321
  • [37] Hippocampus-sparing radiotherapy using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to the primary brain tumor: the result of dosimetric study and neurocognitive function assessment
    Kyung Su Kim
    Chan Woo Wee
    Jin-Yong Seok
    Joo Wan Hong
    Jin-Beom Chung
    Keun-Yong Eom
    Jae-Sung Kim
    Chae-Yong Kim
    Young Ho Park
    Yu Jung Kim
    In Ah Kim
    Radiation Oncology, 13
  • [38] Whole brain radiotherapy with volumetric-modulated arc therapy for pediatric intracranial embryonic carcinoma prevents permanent alopecia
    Iwai, Atsushi
    Umeda, Katsutsugu
    Uto, Megumi
    Nihira, Hiroshi
    Kawaguchi, Koji
    Mikami, Masamitsu
    Nodomi, Seishiro
    Saida, Satoshi
    Hiramatsu, Hidefumi
    Ogura, Kengo
    Tanji, Masahiro
    Arakawa, Yoshiki
    Sakamoto, Tatsunori
    Adachi, Souichi
    Mizowaki, Takashi
    Heike, Toshio
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2017, 64 (08)
  • [39] Dosimetric Comparison of Four Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy Beam Arrangements Utilized for Hippocampal-Sparing Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy
    Prado, Alejandro
    Isabel Milanes, Ana
    Cabello, Eduardo
    Diaz, Raul
    Ferrando, Alejandro
    Pozo, Gustavo
    Leonor, Mario
    Manzano, Marta
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 44 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [40] Dosimetric comparison of coplanar and non-coplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy in head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy
    Gayen, Sanjib
    Kombathula, Harsha
    Manna, Sumanta
    Varshney, Sonal
    Pareek, Puneet
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 38 (02): : 138 - 147