Assessment of different head tilt angles in volumetric modulated arc therapy for hippocampus-avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy

被引:1
|
作者
Yuan, Cuiyun [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Sisi [1 ,2 ]
Li, Yang [1 ,2 ]
Quan, Enzhuo [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Dongjie [1 ,2 ]
Liang, Jun [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Chenbin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Canc Hosp, Natl Canc Ctr, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Shenzhen Hosp, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2024年 / 14卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
radiation therapy; whole brain radiotherapy; hippocampus avoidance; volumetric modulated arc therapy; head tilt; RADIATION-THERAPY; IMRT;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2024.1415471
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose In the field of radiation therapy for brain metastases, whole-brain hippocampus-avoidance treatment is commonly employed. this study aims to examine the impact of different head tilt angles on the dose distribution in the whole-brain target area and organs at risk. It also aims to determine the head tilt angle to achieve optimal radiation therapy outcomes.Methods CT images were collected from 8 brain metastases patients at 5 different groups of head tilt angle. The treatment plans were designed using the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique. The 5 groups of tilt angle were as follows: [0 degrees,10 degrees), [10 degrees,20 degrees), [20 degrees,30 degrees), [30 degrees,40 degrees), and [40 degrees,45 degrees]. The analysis involved assessing parameters such as the uniformity index, conformity index, average dose delivered to the target, dose coverage of the target, hot spots within the target area, maximum dose, and average dose received by organs at risk. Additionally, the study evaluated the correlation between hippocampal dose and other factors, and established linear regression models.Results Significant differences in dosimetric results were observed between the [40 degrees,45 degrees] and [0 degrees,10 degrees) head tilt angles. The [40 degrees,45 degrees] angle showed significant differences compared to the [0 degrees,10 degrees) angle in the average dose in the target area (31.49 +/- 0.29 Gy vs. 31.99 +/- 0.29 Gy, p=0.016), dose uniformity (1.20 +/- 0.03 vs. 1.24 +/- 0.03, p=0.016), hotspots in the target area (33.64 +/- 0.35 Gy vs. 34.42 +/- 0.49 Gy, p=0.016), maximum hippocampal dose (10.73 +/- 0.36 Gy vs. 11.66 +/- 0.59 Gy, p=0.008), maximum dose in the lens (2.82 +/- 1.10 Gy vs. 4.99 +/- 0.16 Gy, p=0.016), and average dose in the lens (1.93 +/- 0.29 Gy vs. 4.22 +/- 0.26 Gy, p=0.008). There is a moderate correlation between the maximum dose in the hippocampi and the PTV length (r=0.49, p=0.001). Likewise, the mean dose in the hippocampi is significantly correlated with the hippocampi length (r=0.34, p=0.04).Conclusion The VMAT plan with a head tilt angle of [40 degrees,45 degrees] met all dose constraints and demonstrated improved uniformity of the target area while reducing the dose to organs at risk. Furthermore, the linear regression models suggest that increasing the head tilt angle within the current range of [0 degrees,45 degrees] is likely to lead to a decrease in the average hippocampal dose.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for whole brain radiotherapy: not only for hippocampal sparing, but also for reduction of dose to organs at risk
    Sood, Sumit
    Pokhrel, Damodar
    McClinton, Christopher
    Lominska, Christopher
    Badkul, Rajeev
    Jiang, Hongyu
    Wang, Fen
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2017, 42 (04) : 375 - 383
  • [22] Whole brain radiotherapy with hippocampal avoidance and simultaneous integrated boost for brain metastases: a dosimetric volumetric-modulated arc therapy study
    Niccolò Giaj Levra
    Gianluisa Sicignano
    Alba Fiorentino
    Sergio Fersino
    Francesco Ricchetti
    Rosario Mazzola
    Stefania Naccarato
    Ruggero Ruggieri
    Filippo Alongi
    La radiologia medica, 2016, 121 : 60 - 69
  • [23] Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases: A Dosimetric and Treatment Efficiency Comparison Between Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy
    Ma, Yidong
    Li, Minghuan
    Yin, Yong
    Kong, Li
    Sun, Xindong
    Lin, Xiutong
    Yu, Jinming
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2010, 9 (05) : 499 - 507
  • [24] Hippocampus-sparing radiotherapy using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to the primary brain tumor: the result of dosimetric study and neurocognitive function assessment
    Kim, Kyung Su
    Wee, Chan Woo
    Seok, Jin-Yong
    Hong, Joo Wan
    Chung, Jin-Beom
    Eom, Keun-Yong
    Kim, Jae-Sung
    Kim, Chae-Yong
    Park, Young Ho
    Kim, Yu Jung
    Kim, In Ah
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 13
  • [25] Sparing the hippocampus and the hypothalamic- pituitary region during whole brain radiotherapy: a volumetric modulated arc therapy planning study
    Mehta, P.
    Janssen, S.
    Fahlbusch, F. B.
    Schmid, S. M.
    Gebauer, J.
    Cremers, F.
    Ziemann, C.
    Tartz, M.
    Rades, D.
    BMC CANCER, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [26] Treatment of brain oligometastases with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy utilising volumetric modulated arc therapy
    Croker, Jeremy
    Chua, Benjamin
    Bernard, Anne
    Allon, Maryse
    Foote, Matthew
    CLINICAL & EXPERIMENTAL METASTASIS, 2016, 33 (02) : 125 - 132
  • [27] Hybrid volumetric modulated arc therapy for whole breast irradiation: a dosimetric comparison of different arc designs
    Ramasubramanian, Velayudham
    Balaji, Karunakaran
    Subramanian, Sitaraman Balaji
    Sathiya, Krishnamoorthi
    Thirunavukarasu, Moorthi
    Radha, Chandrasekaran Anu
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2019, 124 (06): : 546 - 554
  • [28] Dosimetric impact of dental metallic crown on intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy for head and neck cancer
    Kamomae, Takeshi
    Itoh, Yoshiyuki
    Okudaira, Kuniyasu
    Nakaya, Takayoshi
    Tomida, Masashi
    Miyake, Yoshikazu
    Oguchi, Hiroshi
    Shiinoki, Takehiro
    Kawamura, Mariko
    Yamamoto, Noriyuki
    Naganawa, Shinji
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (01): : 234 - 245
  • [29] Cochlear Sparing for Brain Tumor Radiotherapy: A Retrospective Study Comparing Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy
    Soydemir Gocer, Gulsen Pinar
    Ozer, Elif Eda
    TURK ONKOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2020, 35 (03): : 266 - 273
  • [30] Single Arc Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Complex Brain Gliomas: Is There an Advantage as Compared to Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy or by Adding a Partial Arc?
    Davidson, M. T. M.
    Masucci, G. L.
    Follwell, M.
    Blake, S. J.
    Xu, W.
    Moseley, D. J.
    Sanghera, P.
    Wong, C. S.
    Perry, J.
    Tsao, M.
    Sahgal, A.
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2012, 11 (03) : 211 - 220