Optimal governance radius of environmental information disclosure policy: Evidence from China

被引:2
作者
Wan, Kai [1 ]
Yu, Xiaolin [2 ]
机构
[1] Hangzhou Dianzi Univ, Sch Econ, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ Technol, Sch Econ, Hangzhou 310015, Peoples R China
关键词
The environmental information disclosure; policy; Environmental pollution; Optimal radius; Clean industry alternatives; Urban heterogeneity; PERFORMANCE; PARTICIPATION; PRODUCTIVITY; PROTECTION; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.eap.2024.07.010
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Urban pollution governance requires the joint participation of government, society, and enterprises, with the environmental information disclosure policy serving as a novel tool to promote multi-stakeholder engagement. This study aims to delve into the impact of the environmental information disclosure policy on regional environmental quality by using data from Chinese cities. Through analysis, the study gets the following conclusions. Firstly, the environmental information disclosure policy not only effectively reduces urban environmental pollution but also exhibits an apparent spatial spillover effect. The impact of this policy on air pollution in neighboring cities shows an inverted U-shaped pattern of first rising and then falling, with the optimal radius of this external effect estimated at 250 km. Secondly, the results of the mechanism test indicate that government regulatory efforts and clean industry alternatives are essential channels for curbing urban environmental pollution. Lastly, the heterogeneity test shows that the inhibitory effect of the environmental information disclosure policy on environmental pollution is more pronounced in civilized cities, cities in the "two control zones", sulfur dioxide control zones, and cities with high Pollution Information Transparency Index scores.
引用
收藏
页码:618 / 630
页数:13
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Economic reforms and industrial policy in a panel of Chinese cities
    Alder, Simon
    Shao, Lin
    Zilibotti, Fabrizio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2016, 21 (04) : 305 - 349
  • [2] The spillover effects of state spending
    Baicker, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2005, 89 (2-3) : 529 - 544
  • [3] Air pollution policy in Europe: Quantifying the interaction with greenhouse gases and climate change policies
    Bollen, Johannes
    Brink, Corjan
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2014, 46 : 202 - 215
  • [4] China and the environment: Domestic and transnational dynamics of a future hegemon
    Carter, NT
    Mol, APJ
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2006, 15 (02) : 330 - 344
  • [5] County-level CO2 emissions and sequestration in China during 1997-2017
    Chen, Jiandong
    Gao, Ming
    Cheng, Shulei
    Hou, Wenxuan
    Song, Malin
    Liu, Xin
    Liu, Yu
    Shan, Yuli
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2020, 7 (01)
  • [6] Career concerns and multitasking local bureaucrats: Evidence of a target-based performance evaluation system in China
    Chen, Yvonne Jie
    Li, Pei
    Lu, Yi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2018, 133 : 84 - 101
  • [7] The consequences of spatially differentiated water pollution regulation in China
    Chen, Zhao
    Kahn, Matthew E.
    Liu, Yu
    Wang, Zhi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 88 : 468 - 485
  • [8] Information disclosure as environmental regulation: A theoretical analysis
    Cohen, Mark A.
    Santhakumar, V.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2007, 37 (03) : 599 - 620
  • [9] Does environmental protection lead to slower productivity growth in the chemical industry?
    Domazlicky, BR
    Weber, WL
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2004, 28 (03) : 301 - 324
  • [10] DOWLING J, 1975, PAC SOCIOL REV, V18, P122