Subxiphoid Single-Port Robotic Thymectomy Using the Single-Port Robotic System versus VATS: A Multi-Institutional, Retrospective, and Propensity Score-Matched Study

被引:1
|
作者
Lee, Jun Hee [1 ]
Hwang, Jinwook [2 ]
Park, Tae Hyun [1 ]
Gu, Byung Mo [1 ]
Jung, Younggi [3 ]
Yi, Eunjue [3 ]
Lee, Sungho [3 ]
Hwang, Soon Young [4 ]
Chung, Jae ho [3 ]
Kim, Hyun Koo [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Guro Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Seoul 02841, South Korea
[2] Korea Univ, Ansan Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Ansan 15355, South Korea
[3] Korea Univ, Anam Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Seoul 02841, South Korea
[4] Korea Univ, Coll Med, Dept Biostat, Seoul 02841, South Korea
关键词
robotics; robotic-assisted thoracic surgery; single-port; subxiphoid; thymectomy; video-assisted thoracic surgery; MINIMALLY INVASIVE THYMECTOMY; THORACOSCOPIC THYMECTOMY; SURGERY;
D O I
10.3390/cancers16162856
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Subxiphoid single-port robotic-assisted thoracic surgery thymectomy using the single-port robotic system is currently being developed for minimally invasive surgery. This retrospective multi-institutional study is the largest study of its kind on this technique and is the first to compare the perioperative outcomes of this technique to those of subxiphoid single-port video-assisted thoracic surgery thymectomy. This novel technique was associated with a lower conversion rate to multi-port surgery, shorter chest tube drainage duration, and shorter postoperative hospital stays, demonstrating its potential as a surgical treatment option for selected patients.Abstract Subxiphoid thymectomy is a novel alternative to the transthoracic approach and sternotomy, with potential benefits, such as reduced postoperative pain and faster recovery. We previously reported the initial experience with subxiphoid single-port robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (SRATS) thymectomy using the single-port robotic system (SPS). However, the efficacy of this technique remains unknown. Thus, this study examined the multi-institutional experience with SRATS thymectomy and compared the perioperative outcomes of this technique to those of subxiphoid single-port video-assisted thoracic surgery (SVATS) thymectomy. The data of patients who underwent subxiphoid SRATS and SVATS thymectomy, performed by three thoracic surgeons at three institutions between September 2018 and May 2024, were retrospectively collected. In total, 110 patients were included, with 85 and 25 undergoing SRATS and SVATS thymectomy, respectively. After propensity score matching, 25 patients were included in each group. The SRATS group was associated with a lower conversion rate to multi-port surgery (0% vs. 20%, p = 0.05), shorter chest tube drainage duration (1.32 +/- 0.75 vs. 2.00 +/- 1.29 days, p = 0.003), and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (2.52 +/- 1.00 vs. 5.08 +/- 5.20 days, p = 0.003). Subxiphoid SRATS thymectomy using the SPS is feasible and is a good alternative to conventional thymectomy. Further studies are necessary to confirm its benefits.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] SINGLE-PORT EXTRAPERITONEAL VS TRANSPERITONEAL ROBOTIC-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL MATCHED-PAIR COMPARISON OF OUTCOMES
    Abou Zeinab, Mahmoud
    Ferguson, Ethan
    Kaviani, Aaron
    Beksac, Alp T.
    Moschovas, Marcio
    Morgantini, Luca
    Hemal, Sij
    Talamini, Susan
    Joseph, Jean
    Kim, Moses
    Crivellaro, Simone
    Patel, Vipul
    Nix, Jeffrey
    Kaouk, Jihad
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E918 - E919
  • [42] Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Between Single-Port and Multi-Port Robotic Adrenalectomy
    Fang, Andrew M.
    Fazendin, Jessica M.
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    Porterfield, John R.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2023, 89 (05) : 1668 - 1672
  • [43] Comparison of Outcomes Between Single-Port Robotic Sacrocolpopexy and Multi-Port Approaches
    Ferrigni, E.
    Mead-Harvey, C.
    Quillen, J.
    Butler, K.
    Khan, A.
    Wolter, C.
    Cornella, J.
    Yi, J.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2025, 145 (5S): : 51S - 52S
  • [44] Transvesical versus extraperitoneal single-port robotic radical prostatectomy: a matched-pair analysis
    Mahmoud Abou Zeinab
    Alp Tuna Beksac
    Ethan Ferguson
    Aaron Kaviani
    Jihad Kaouk
    World Journal of Urology, 2022, 40 : 2001 - 2008
  • [45] Initial Experience With Single-Port Robotic Right Colectomies: Results of an Investigator-Initiated Investigational Device Exemption Study Using a Novel Single-Port Robotic Platform
    Sarin, Ankit
    Barnes, Katherine
    Shui, Amy
    Nakamura, Yukino
    Hoffman, Daniel
    Romero-Hernandez, Fernanda
    Chern, Hueylan
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2024, 67 (10) : e1600 - e1606
  • [46] Transvesical versus extraperitoneal single-port robotic radical prostatectomy: a matched-pair analysis
    Abou Zeinab, Mahmoud
    Beksac, Alp Tuna
    Ferguson, Ethan
    Kaviani, Aaron
    Kaouk, Jihad
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 40 (08) : 2001 - 2008
  • [48] ROBOTIC SURGERY SKILL TRANSFERENCE BETWEEN MULTI-PORT (MP) AND SINGLE-PORT (SP) ROBOTIC PLATFORMS
    Melnyk, Rachel
    Saba, Patrick
    Witthaus, Michael
    Holler, Tyler
    Xu, Beilei
    Wu, Wencheng
    Steinmetz, Alexis
    Yuen, Kit
    Doersch, Karen
    Ellis, Elizabeth
    Khalil, Mahmoud
    Gantz, Jacob
    Tabayoyong, William
    Bloom, Jonathan
    Rashid, Hani
    Kavoussi, Nicholas
    Ghazi, Ahmed
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E1016 - E1017
  • [49] INITIAL EXPERIENCE WITH SINGLE-PORT ROBOTIC RETROPERITONEAL PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY USING A PURPOSE-BUILT SINGLE-PORT SURGICAL SYSTEM: TECHNICAL DETAILS
    Sawczyn, Guilherme
    Kim, Soodong
    Aminsharifi, Alireza
    Wilson, Clark A.
    Garisto, Juan
    Kaouk, Jihad
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E183 - E183
  • [50] Transvaginal single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study
    Li, Junwei
    Sima, Yizhen
    Hu, Changdong
    Wang, Xiaojuan
    Lu, Zhiying
    Hua, Keqin
    Chen, Yisong
    BMC SURGERY, 2022, 22 (01)