Digital workers' ' stress: The role of digital creativity in the future jobs

被引:3
作者
Orlandi, Ludovico Bullini [1 ]
Pocek, Jasna [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Kraus, Sascha [5 ,6 ]
Zardini, Alessandro [7 ]
Rossignoli, Cecilia [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Management, Via Capo Lucca 34, I-40126 Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Florence, Dept Econ & Management, I-50124 Florence, Italy
[3] Blekinge Inst Technol, Valhallavagen 1, S-37141 Karlskrona, Sweden
[4] Lund Univ, CIRCLE, Solvegatan 16, S-22362 Lund, Sweden
[5] Free Univ Bozen Bolzano, Fac Econ & Management, Piazza Univ 1, I-39100 Bolzano, Italy
[6] Univ Johannesburg, Dept Business Management, Johannesburg, South Africa
[7] Univ Verona, Dept Business Adm, Via Cantarane 24, I-37129 Verona, Italy
来源
JOURNAL OF INNOVATION & KNOWLEDGE | 2024年 / 9卷 / 02期
关键词
Future of work; Remote work; Digital creativity; Remote work self-efficacy; Remote work stress; SELF-EFFICACY; REMOTE WORK; OCCUPATIONAL STRESS; RESOURCES; KNOWLEDGE; METAANALYSIS; TECHNOLOGY; TELEWORK; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jik.2024.100492
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The relationship between remote work and employee well-being represents a longstanding debate in the management literature, and it has been rekindled by the remote work adoption forced by COVID-19 lock- downs. Previous literature has shown that remote working can enhance flexibility and work-life balance under certain conditions. However, it can also be a source of increased stress, burnout, and greater work-to- family conflicts. The adverse effects are particularly relevant when remote work adoption is imposed by external conditions for both employees willing to adopt it and those who feel less comfortable with it. This study contributes to the debate by surveying 471 employees "forced" into remote work adoption because of COVID-19 lockdowns and by pinpointing three individual-level job resources that can affect stress in such a context. In particular, it shows that "future of work" job components are not a source of stress, as suggested by recent research, but a critical antecedent of remote working self-efficacy and a source of creativity in leveraging digital technologies in such a context. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Espa & ntilde;a, S.L.U. on behalf of Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [41] COVID-19 and the Acceleration of Digital Transformation and the Future of Work
    Kudyba, Stephan
    [J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, 2020, 37 (04) : 284 - 287
  • [42] Lee DS, 2011, INFORMATION-TOKYO, V14, P2931
  • [43] Developing conceptual frameworks for creativity, ICT and teacher education
    Loveless, Avril
    Burton, Jeremy
    Turvey, Keith
    [J]. THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2006, 1 (01) : 3 - 13
  • [44] Lucas H. C. Jr., 1994, Journal of Management Information Systems, V10, P9
  • [45] Who fits fits into the digital workplace? Mapping digital self-efficacy and agility onto psychological traits
    Maran, Thomas K.
    Liegl, Simon
    Davila, Andres
    Moder, Sebastian
    Kraus, Sascha
    Mahto, Raj, V
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2022, 175
  • [46] Innovation Analytics and Digital Innovation Experimentation: The Rise of Research-driven Online Review Platforms
    Mariani, Marcello M.
    Nambisan, Satish
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 172
  • [47] Three scenarios for the future of work
    Meda, Dominique
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL LABOUR REVIEW, 2019, : 627 - 652
  • [48] Biting the bullet: When self-efficacy mediates the stressful effects of COVID-19 beliefs
    Meyer, Natanya
    Niemand, Thomas
    Davila, Andres
    Kraus, Sascha
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (01):
  • [49] Meza J., 2017, elearning, e-education, and online training, P145, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-49625-218, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-49625-218]
  • [50] OCCUPATIONAL STRESS - ITS CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES FOR JOB-PERFORMANCE
    MOTOWIDLO, SJ
    PACKARD, JS
    MANNING, MR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 71 (04) : 618 - 629