Deep Learning-Based Artificial Intelligence Can Differentiate Treatment-Resistant and Responsive Depression Cases with High Accuracy

被引:2
作者
Metin, Sinem Zeynep [1 ]
Uyulan, Caglar [2 ]
Farhad, Shams [3 ]
Erguzel, Tuerker Tekin [4 ]
Turk, Omer [5 ]
Metin, Baris [6 ]
Cerezci, Onder [7 ]
Tarhan, Nevzat [1 ]
机构
[1] Uskudar Univ, Dept Psychiat, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Katip Celebi Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Izmir, Turkiye
[3] Uskudar Univ, Dept Neurosci, Istanbul, Turkiye
[4] Uskudar Univ, Fac Engn & Nat Sci, Dept Software Engn, Istanbul, Turkiye
[5] Mardin Artuklu Univ, Dept Comp Technol, Mardin, Turkiye
[6] Uskudar Univ, Med Fac, Neurol Dept, Istanbul, Turkiye
[7] Uskudar Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physioterapy & Rehabil, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
depression; treatment-resistant depression; deep learning; convolutional neural network; EEG; electroencephalography; CONNECTIVITY; MANAGEMENT; ASYMMETRY; MARKER;
D O I
10.1177/15500594241273181
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Although there are many treatment options available for depression, a large portion of patients with depression are diagnosed with treatment-resistant depression (TRD), which is characterized by an inadequate response to antidepressant treatment. Identifying the TRD population is crucial in terms of saving time and resources in depression treatment. Recently several studies employed various methods on EEG datasets for automatic depression detection or treatment outcome prediction. However, no previous study has used the deep learning (DL) approach and EEG signals for detecting treatment resistance. Method: 77 patients with TRD, 43 patients with non-TRD, and 40 healthy controls were compared using GoogleNet convolutional neural network and DL on EEG data. Additionally, Class Activation Maps (CAMs) acquired from the TRD and non-TRD groups were used to obtain distinctive regions for classification. Results: GoogleNet classified the healthy controls and non-TRD group with 88.43%, the healthy controls and TRD subjects with 89.73%, and the TRD and non-TRD group with 90.05% accuracy. The external validation accuracy for the TRD-non-TRD classification was 73.33%. Finally, the CAM analysis revealed that the TRD group contained dominant features in class detection of deep learning architecture in almost all electrodes. Limitations: Our study is limited by the moderate sample size of clinical groups and the retrospective nature of the study. Conclusion: These findings suggest that EEG-based deep learning can be used to classify treatment resistance in depression and may in the future prove to be a useful tool in psychiatry practice to identify patients who need more vigorous intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 130
页数:12
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [51] Major Depressive Disorder Classification Based on Different Convolutional Neural Network Models: Deep Learning Approach
    Uyulan, Caglar
    Erguzel, Turker Tekin
    Unubol, Huseyin
    Cebi, Merve
    Sayar, Gokben Hizli
    Nezhadasad, Mehdi
    Tarhan, Nevzat
    [J]. CLINICAL EEG AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 52 (01) : 38 - 51
  • [52] Frontal alpha asymmetry as a diagnostic marker in depression: Fact or fiction? A meta-analysis
    van der Vinne, Nikita
    Vollebregt, Madelon A.
    van Putten, Michel J. A. M.
    Arns, Martijn
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL, 2017, 16 : 79 - 87
  • [53] HybridEEGNet: A Convolutional Neural Network for EEG Feature Learning and Depression Discrimination
    Wan, Zhijiang
    Huang, Jiajin
    Zhang, Hao
    Zhou, Haiyan
    Yang, Jie
    Zhong, Ning
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 (08): : 30332 - 30342
  • [54] Wei J., 2009, RUANJIAN XUEBAO, V19, P2833, DOI [10.3724/sp.j.1001.2008.02833, DOI 10.3724/SP.J.1001.2008.02833]
  • [55] An electroencephalographic signature predicts antidepressant response in major depression
    Wu, Wei
    Zhang, Yu
    Jiang, Jing
    Lucas, Molly, V
    Fonzo, Gregory A.
    Rolle, Camarin E.
    Cooper, Crystal
    Chin-Fatt, Cherise
    Krepel, Noralie
    Cornelssen, Carena A.
    Wright, Rachael
    Toll, Russell T.
    Trivedi, Hersh M.
    Monuszko, Karen
    Caudle, Trevor L.
    Sarhadi, Kamron
    Jha, Manish K.
    Trombello, Joseph M.
    Deckersbach, Thilo
    Adams, Phil
    McGrath, Patrick J.
    Weissman, Myrna M.
    Fava, Maurizio
    Pizzagalli, Diego A.
    Arns, Martijn
    Trivedi, Madhukar H.
    Etkin, Amit
    [J]. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2020, 38 (04) : 439 - +
  • [56] Xie YL, 2020, IEEE ENG MED BIO, P1503, DOI 10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9176471
  • [57] Depressive Disorder Recognition Based on Frontal EEG Signals and Deep Learning
    Xu, Yanting
    Zhong, Hongyang
    Ying, Shangyan
    Liu, Wei
    Chen, Guibin
    Luo, Xiaodong
    Li, Gang
    [J]. SENSORS, 2023, 23 (20)
  • [58] Zhang XW, 2020, IEEE ENG MED BIO, P128, DOI 10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9175956
  • [59] M-Isomap: Orthogonal Constrained Marginal Isomap for Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction
    Zhang, Zhao
    Chow, Tommy W. S.
    Zhao, Mingbo
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS, 2013, 43 (01) : 180 - 191
  • [60] Use of Machine Learning for Predicting Escitalopram Treatment Outcome From Electroencephalography Recordings in Adult Patients With Depression
    Zhdanov, Andrey
    Atluri, Sravya
    Wong, Willy
    Vaghei, Yasaman
    Daskalakis, Zafiris J.
    Blumberger, Daniel M.
    Frey, Benicio N.
    Giacobbe, Peter
    Lam, Raymond W.
    Milev, Roumen
    Mueller, Daniel J.
    Turecki, Gustavo
    Parikh, Sagar V.
    Rotzinger, Susan
    Soares, Claudio N.
    Brenner, Colleen A.
    Vila-Rodriguez, Fidel
    McAndrews, Mary Pat
    Kleffner, Killian
    Alonso-Prieto, Esther
    Arnott, Stephen R.
    Foster, Jane A.
    Strother, Stephen C.
    Uher, Rudolf
    Kennedy, Sidney H.
    Farzan, Faranak
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (01) : E1918377