"We're Just Talking": Constructing a Recent Trend in Emerging Adult Romantic Relationship Development

被引:2
作者
Sibley, D. Scott [1 ]
Vennum, Amber [2 ]
Mallory, Allen B. [3 ]
Brown, Cameron C. [4 ]
LeFebvre, Leah E. [5 ]
机构
[1] Northern Illinois Univ, Sch Family & Consumer Sci, Wirtz Hall 123, De Kalb, IL 60115 USA
[2] Kansas State Univ, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH USA
[4] Texas Tech Univ, Lubbock, TX 79403 USA
[5] Univ Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL USA
来源
JOURNAL OF COUPLE & RELATIONSHIP THERAPY-INNOVATIONS IN CLINICAL AND EDUCATIONAL INTERVENTIONS | 2024年 / 23卷 / 04期
关键词
just talking; emerging adulthood; romantic relationships; decision-making; commitment; CASUAL SEXUAL RELATIONSHIPS; BENEFITS RELATIONSHIPS; FRIENDS; DEFINITIONS; MARRIAGE; HOOKING; CHALLENGES; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1080/15332691.2024.2406823
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Emerging adults' relationship development is an increasingly multi-faceted process characterized by ambiguity. Just talking has emerged as a phrase to characterize early relationship formation in popular culture, yet it remains understudied in the empirical literature. Constructivist grounded theory was used to explore this phenomenon in modern romantic relationship formation employing nine focus groups (N = 52) of emerging adult men and women from two large Midwestern universities. Eleven unique themes were generated to identify how emerging adult men and women conceptualize just talking (pre-dating, ambiguity about commitment, unofficial romantic label), reasons for just talking (pressure to keep options open, protection from rejection, testing the waters, avoiding defining the relationship), and how technology may facilitate the just talking process (increases the pool of potential partners, comfortable frequent contact, image crafting, less effort required). The findings have substantial implications for educators, clinicians, and other professionals who work with emerging adults.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 281
页数:33
相关论文
共 88 条
[31]  
Johnson S.M., 2004, PRACTICE EMOTIONALLY, V2nd, DOI DOI 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070154
[32]   Four Functions for Four Relationships: Consensus Definitions of University Students [J].
Jonason, Peter K. .
ARCHIVES OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, 2013, 42 (08) :1407-1414
[33]  
Julian C. A., 2022, MEDIAN AGE 1 MARRIAG, DOI [https://doi.org/10.25035/ncfmr/fp-22-15, DOI 10.25035/NCFMR/FP-22-15]
[34]   Communicative Dilemmas in Emerging Adults' Friends With Benefits Relationships: Challenges to Relational Talk [J].
Knight, Kendra .
EMERGING ADULTHOOD, 2014, 2 (04) :270-279
[35]  
Knobloch LK, 2011, COMMUN MONOGR, V78, P3, DOI [10.1080/03637751.2010.542471, 10.1080/03637751.2011.618137]
[36]   "Defining the relationship" in adolescent and young adult romantic relationships [J].
Knopp, Kayla ;
Rhoades, Galena K. ;
Stanley, Scott M. ;
Markman, Howard J. .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2020, 37 (07) :2078-2097
[37]  
Konstam Varda., 2019, The Romantic Lives of Emerging Adults: Moving from I to We
[38]  
KRUEGER RA, 1994, FOCUS GROUPS PRACTIC
[39]   The persistence of gendered dating [J].
Lamont, Ellen .
SOCIOLOGY COMPASS, 2021, 15 (11)
[40]   Swiping me off my feet: Explicating relationship initiation on Tinder [J].
LeFebvre, Leah E. .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2018, 35 (09) :1205-1229