Research on the Mechanism of Collaborative Innovation in Green Technology among Supply Chain Enterprises Based on Cost Sharing and Market Competition

被引:2
作者
Zou, Yijing [1 ,2 ]
He, Dayi [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Rui [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Nat Resources, Key Lab Carrying Capac Assessment Resource & Envir, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
supply chain; green technology; collaborative innovation; cost sharing; market competition; PRODUCT INNOVATION; DIFFERENTIAL GAME; PERFORMANCE; SUSTAINABILITY; MANAGEMENT; CAPABILITY;
D O I
10.3390/su16156295
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Supply chain green technology collaborative innovation is an important means for enterprises to improve the greenness of their products. This paper takes supply chain green technology innovation collaboration as the research object and constructs a stochastic differential game model, which not only provides reference for enterprises to choose the optimal type of technology innovation by combining with their own characteristics, but also provides a reference for their innovation decision-making in different market competition environments. The study shows the following: (1) in green product innovation, the formation of the cost-sharing contract is less affected by the intensity of competition in the green market when the market preference for greenness is relatively low. Therefore, government subsidies become an important tool to effectively guide the market mechanism to achieve the desired goal. As market competition intensifies, manufacturers' incentives to suppliers will shift from reducing costs to increasing demand. (2) In green process innovation, when the intensity of green competition is low and suppliers' process innovation efficiency is high, manufacturers should bear more costs; when the market preference for greenness is low, the market competition is intense, and the suppliers' process innovation efficiency is low, the suppliers should bear more costs to help the manufacturers gain more market shares. (3) When retailers' preference for greenness is relatively low, the government subsidy becomes an important tool to effectively guide the market mechanism to achieve the desired goal. (4) When the retailer's green promotion performance is higher than the manufacturer's, the manufacturer should bear more green promotion costs; conversely, the retailer should bear more green promotion costs. (5) Over time, the marginal increase in price over the marginal increase in greenness helps stabilise price volatility, considering consumer preferences. Conversely, it helps to increase the average value of prices.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Abbas J., 2024, Innov Green Dev, V3, DOI [10.1016/j.igd.2023.100111, DOI 10.1016/J.IGD.2023.100111]
  • [2] Achillas C., 2018, Green Supply Chain Management, DOI [10.4324/9781315628691, DOI 10.4324/9781315628691]
  • [3] Price competition between two leader-follower supply chains with risk-averse retailers under demand uncertainty
    Amin-Naseri, M. R.
    Khojasteh, M. Azari
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 79 (1-4) : 377 - 393
  • [4] Corporate sustainability development in China: review and analysis
    Bai, Chunguang
    Sarkis, Joseph
    Dou, Yijie
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2015, 115 (01) : 5 - 40
  • [5] External knowledge sources, green innovation and performance
    Ben Arfi, Wissal
    Hikkerova, Lubica
    Sahut, Jean-Michel
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2018, 129 : 210 - 220
  • [6] Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: Developments and directions
    Brandenburg, Marcus
    Govindan, Kannan
    Sarkis, Joseph
    Seuring, Stefan
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2014, 233 (02) : 299 - 312
  • [7] Optimization and Coordination of Fresh Product Supply Chains with Freshness-Keeping Effort
    Cai, Xiaoqiang
    Chen, Jian
    Xiao, Yongbo
    Xu, Xiaolin
    [J]. PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2010, 19 (03) : 261 - 278
  • [8] The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on green product innovation and performance
    Chan, Hing Kai
    Yee, Rachel W. Y.
    Dai, Jing
    Lim, Ming K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2016, 181 : 384 - 391
  • [9] [陈恒 Chen Heng], 2024, [中国管理科学, Chinese Journal of Management Science], V32, P135
  • [10] The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan
    Chen, Yu-Shan
    Lai, Shyh-Bao
    Wen, Chao-Tung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2006, 67 (04) : 331 - 339