International trade and biodiversity: Is export a species killer?

被引:0
作者
Tian, Hui [1 ]
Cheng, Chaoyin [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Business, 932 South Lushan Rd, Changsha 410083, Peoples R China
关键词
International Trade; Biodiversity; Export; Species Diversity; China; LAND-USE CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; PARROT TRADE; CONSERVATION; EXTINCTION; FUTURE; GLOBALIZATION; CONSUMPTION; LANDSCAPES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108313
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Species diversity has continuously been experiencing deterioration in the world that is widely connected with global trade. Previous studies have identified the impact of specific traded commodities on species diversity, but little evidence of causality from overall exports has been found. Using two-stage least-squares method with an instrument variable (IV-2SLS) and province-level panel data during 1978-2020, this paper explores the biological costs of international trade by investigating the impact of exports from China on domestic species diversity. We also examine the mechanisms through which exports affect species diversity and how heterogeneous factors cause differences on loss of species diversity. Results suggest that a 1% increase in export scale decreases species diversity by 2.28%. We also find that resource exploitation, infrastructure construction and land use are three major channels. Additionally, the provinces with more alien invasive species (over 450) or with higher dependence on exporting leather and textiles (over 16%) may suffer over 4% of species diversity loss per 1% of export scale. Moreover, the loss of plants is 2.43%, which is 0.83% higher than that of animals. Our transdisciplinary work is expected to be helpful for policy makers who pursue dual goals of export development and biodiversity protection.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 134 条
  • [1] CITES, sustainable use of wild species and incentive-driven conservation in developing countries, with an emphasis on southern Africa
    Abensperg-Traun, Max
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2009, 142 (05) : 948 - 963
  • [2] Ecology - Globalization, migration, and Latin American ecosystems
    Aide, TM
    Grau, HR
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2004, 305 (5692) : 1915 - 1916
  • [3] Angrist JD, 2009, MOSTLY HARMLESS ECONOMETRICS: AN EMPIRICISTS COMPANION, P1
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2016, GLOBAL ENV OUTLOOK G
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2020, World wildlife crime report: Trafficking in protected species
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2020, Global Biodiversity Outlook 5. Report.
  • [7] Is free trade good for the environment?
    Antweiler, W
    Copeland, BR
    Taylor, MS
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (04) : 877 - 908
  • [8] New ecological redline policy (ERP) to secure ecosystem services in China
    Bai, Yang
    Jiang, Bo
    Wang, Min
    Li, Hui
    Alatalo, Juha M.
    Huang, Shenfa
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2016, 55 : 348 - 351
  • [9] Threats of global warming to the world's freshwater fishes
    Barbarossa, Valerio
    Bosmans, Joyce
    Wanders, Niko
    King, Henry
    Bierkens, Marc F. P.
    Huijbregts, Mark A. J.
    Schipper, Aafke M.
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 12 (01)
  • [10] THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS
    BARON, RM
    KENNY, DA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) : 1173 - 1182