Library Partnership Rating: a case study about an open, community-built rubric to evaluate journal publishers

被引:0
作者
Sinn, Robin [1 ]
Caldwell, Rachel [2 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Univ Lib, Collect & Open Strategies, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Acad Engagement Dept, UMass Amherst Lib, Amherst, MA USA
来源
INSIGHTS-THE UKSG JOURNAL | 2024年 / 37卷
关键词
rubric; journals; publishers; libraryvalues; open;
D O I
10.1629/uksg.658
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
This case study describes the formation of Library Partnership Rating (LPR), a librarian-created rubricbased system to evaluate journal publisher practices. The LPR Rubric stems from the library profession's values and helps identify practices that demonstrate shared values between libraries and values-driven journal publishers - the 'partners' in Library Partnership. The authors invited collaboration with university presses, learned societies, open access advocates, values-driven international publishers and publishing organizations, and other librarians. The resulting rubric is relevant and applicable as a decision-making tool for both libraries and publishers. In this case study, the authors describe the iterative process of creating the rubric, how they incorporated the value of community into the development process (including attention to equitability and solicitation of publisher feedback) and next steps.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], ASERL Eleven' Licensing Principles
  • [2] [Anonymous], HOM PAG
  • [3] [Anonymous], Documentation, Participation Reports
  • [4] [Anonymous], FOREST Framework for Values-Driven Scholarly Communication
  • [5] [Anonymous], The Principles of Open Scholarly Infrastructure
  • [6] [Anonymous], DIGITAL PRESERVATION
  • [7] [Anonymous], Principles and values
  • [8] [Anonymous], LP Rubric
  • [9] [Anonymous], LP Rubric 1.1 Instructions for Scoring
  • [10] [Anonymous], It works!