Cross-cultural comparative analysis of student motivation and autonomy in learning: perspectives from Hong Kong and the United Kingdom

被引:4
作者
Lo, Noble Po-Kan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Coll Profess & Continuing Educ, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Lancaster, Fac Arts & Social Sci, Dept Educ Res, Lancaster, England
关键词
independent learning; learner motivation; university education; United Kingdom; Hong Kong; SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIAL-DEVELOPMENT; STRATEGIES; PERFORMANCE; ORIENTATION; INTERVIEWS; EFFICACY; BELIEFS;
D O I
10.3389/feduc.2024.1393968
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Introduction This research project examines student perspectives on independent learning in the United Kingdom and Hong Kong. Independent learning describes learning undertaken by students outside of standard institutional learning environments. Prior research has suggested that motivations to undertake independent learning and the strategies involved may differ across cultural contexts, institutions, and individual learners.Methods This research employs primary qualitative research consisting of interviews with 16 students in Business Studies (eight British and eight Chinese). The study takes a social constructionist approach to better establish the ways in which culture may serve as a mediator for motivation to learn independently and the strategies pursued to this end.Results The study's findings note key differences in the motivations to complete independent learning across either cohort, as well as distinct conceptualizations of what strategies and practices facilitate effective independent learning.Discussion This research highlights significant cultural differences in the motivations, strategies, and skills related to independent learning between students in the United Kingdom and Hong Kong. It also notes the potential for socioeconomic factors, institutional structures, and assessment methods, alongside culture, to contribute to these differences.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 108 条
  • [61] Analytic Strategies and Sample Size
    Morse, Janice M.
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2015, 25 (10) : 1317 - 1318
  • [62] Governance of academic research data under the GDPR-lessons from the UK
    Mourby, Miranda
    Gowans, Heather
    Aidinlis, Stergios
    Smith, Hannah
    Kaye, Jane
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL DATA PRIVACY LAW, 2019, 9 (03) : 192 - 206
  • [63] Prediction of academic achievement based on learning strategies and outcome expectations among medical students
    Nabizadeh, Sakineh
    Hajian, Sepideh
    Sheikhan, Zohre
    Rafiei, Fatemeh
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [64] NFER, 2019, Privacy
  • [65] Nicholls J.G., 1990, Assessing Higher Order Thinking in Mathematics, P137
  • [66] Noble Helen, 2015, Evid Based Nurs, V18, P34, DOI 10.1136/eb-2015-102054
  • [67] Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria
    Nowell, Lorelli S.
    Norris, Jill M.
    White, Deborah E.
    Moules, Nancy J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2017, 16 (01):
  • [68] O'Reilly K., 2009, Key concepts in ethnography, DOI 10.4135/9781446268308
  • [69] Ogan A, 2009, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V5621, P593, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-02774-1_64
  • [70] Interviews in qualitative research
    Peters, K.
    Halcomb, E.
    [J]. NURSE RESEARCHER, 2015, 22 (04) : 6 - 7